Laura Rebekah Lutz

Array ( [id] => 9423657 [patent_doc_number] => 20140108308 [patent_country] => US [patent_kind] => A1 [patent_issue_date] => 2014-04-17 [patent_title] => 'SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COMBINING DATA FOR IDENTIFYING COMPATIBILITY' [patent_app_type] => utility [patent_app_number] => 13/939951 [patent_app_country] => US [patent_app_date] => 2013-07-11 [patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00 [patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 13 [patent_figures_cnt] => 13 [patent_no_of_words] => 8529 [patent_no_of_claims] => 15 [patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3 [patent_words_short_claim] => 0 [patent_maintenance] => 1 [patent_no_of_assignments] => 0 [patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication [pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13939951 [rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>)

Array ( [id] => 10922231 [patent_doc_number] => 20140325251 [patent_country] => US [patent_kind] => A1 [patent_issue_date] => 2014-10-30 [patent_title] => 'SYNTHETIC TIME SERIES DATA GENERATION' [patent_app_type] => utility [patent_app_number] => 13/874221 [patent_app_country] => US [patent_app_date] => 2013-04-30 [patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00 [patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 8 [patent_figures_cnt] => 8 [patent_no_of_words] => 3623 [patent_no_of_claims] => 15 [patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3 [patent_words_short_claim] => 0 [patent_maintenance] => 1 [patent_no_of_assignments] => 0 [patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication [pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13874221 [rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>)

Array ( [id] => 10596720 [patent_doc_number] => 09317814 [patent_country] => US [patent_kind] => B2 [patent_issue_date] => 2016-04-19 [patent_title] => 'Automatically generating an ontology and axioms from a business-process model' [patent_app_type] => utility [patent_app_number] => 13/848083 [patent_app_country] => US [patent_app_date] => 2013-03-21 [patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00 [patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 3 [patent_figures_cnt] => 3 [patent_no_of_words] => 9182 [patent_no_of_claims] => 11 [patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 7 [patent_words_short_claim] => 328 [patent_maintenance] => 1 [patent_no_of_assignments] => 0 [patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent [pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13848083 [rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>)

Array ( [id] => 10195191 [patent_doc_number] => 09224103 [patent_country] => US [patent_kind] => B1 [patent_issue_date] => 2015-12-29 [patent_title] => 'Automatic annotation for training and evaluation of semantic analysis engines' [patent_app_type] => utility [patent_app_number] => 13/801197 [patent_app_country] => US [patent_app_date] => 2013-03-13 [patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00 [patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 7 [patent_figures_cnt] => 7 [patent_no_of_words] => 8366 [patent_no_of_claims] => 21 [patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3 [patent_words_short_claim] => 181 [patent_maintenance] => 1 [patent_no_of_assignments] => 0 [patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent [pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13801197 [rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>)

Array ( [id] => 10137932 [patent_doc_number] => 09171253 [patent_country] => US [patent_kind] => B1 [patent_issue_date] => 2015-10-27 [patent_title] => 'Identifying predictive models resistant to concept drift' [patent_app_type] => utility [patent_app_number] => 13/755443 [patent_app_country] => US [patent_app_date] => 2013-01-31 [patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00 [patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 4 [patent_figures_cnt] => 4 [patent_no_of_words] => 6303 [patent_no_of_claims] => 18 [patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3 [patent_words_short_claim] => 171 [patent_maintenance] => 1 [patent_no_of_assignments] => 0 [patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent [pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13755443 [rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>)

Array ( [id] => 10603322 [patent_doc_number] => 09323890 [patent_country] => US [patent_kind] => B2 [patent_issue_date] => 2016-04-26 [patent_title] => 'Optimal solution search method and optimal solution search device' [patent_app_type] => utility [patent_app_number] => 14/349325 [patent_app_country] => US [patent_app_date] => 2012-10-05 [patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00 [patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 12 [patent_figures_cnt] => 19 [patent_no_of_words] => 15378 [patent_no_of_claims] => 17 [patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 2 [patent_words_short_claim] => 460 [patent_maintenance] => 1 [patent_no_of_assignments] => 0 [patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent [pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 14349325 [rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>)

Array ( [id] => 8941518 [patent_doc_number] => 20130191315 [patent_country] => US [patent_kind] => A1 [patent_issue_date] => 2013-07-25 [patent_title] => 'METHOD OF DYNAMIC MODELING OF THE WORKFLOW, WITH THE USE OF INFORMATION SYSTEM' [patent_app_type] => utility [patent_app_number] => 13/824442 [patent_app_country] => US [patent_app_date] => 2011-08-31 [patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00 [patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 3 [patent_figures_cnt] => 3 [patent_no_of_words] => 3106 [patent_no_of_claims] => 9 [patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 1 [patent_words_short_claim] => 0 [patent_maintenance] => 1 [patent_no_of_assignments] => 0 [patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication [pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13824442 [rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>)