Peloton Interactive, Inc. v. Mad Dogg Athletics, Inc. > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2022-00016
Filing Date Oct 13, 2021
Institution Decision Date Apr 8, 2022
Decision Date Apr 5, 2023
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status Final Written Decision
Appeal2023-2018
Administrative JudgesHubert C. Lorin, Jason W. Melvin, Brent M. Dougal
Judge Writing the Final DecisionHubert C. Lorin
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
Claims Instituted: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
Claims Invalidated: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
4Peloton Interactive, Inc.
Attorney Name: Robert Steinberg
Latham & Watkins
Peloton Interactive, Inc.
Attorney Name: Gabriel S. Gross
Latham & Watkins
Peloton Interactive, Inc.
Attorney Name: Ethan Lawrence Plail
Latham & Watkins
Peloton Interactive, Inc.
Attorney Name: Kimberly Q. Li
Latham & Watkins
Patent Owner Attorneys
4Mad Dogg Athletics, Inc.
Attorney Name: Theodore Stephen Maceiko
Maceiko IP
Mad Dogg Athletics, Inc.
Attorney Name: Sarah M. Walkington
Maceiko IP
Maceiko IP
Attorney Name: Gloria Perez
Maceiko IP
Mad Dogg Athletics, Inc.
Attorney Name: David C. Paulus
Maceiko IP
Related Patents
| Doc No | Title | Issue date |
|---|---|---|
| 09694240 | Programmed exercise bicycle with computer aided guidance | Jul 4, 2017 |
