Unified Patents, LLC v. AutoBrilliance, LLC > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2020-00354
Filing Date Dec 31, 2019
Institution Decision Date Jul 8, 2020
Decision Date Jul 6, 2021
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status Final Written Decision
Administrative JudgesMatthew S. Meyers, Ken B. Barrett, Timothy J. Goodson
Judge Writing the Final DecisionMatthew S. Meyers
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7
Claims Instituted: 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7
Claims Invalidated: 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
9Unified Patents
Attorney Name: Raghav Bajaj
Haynes and Boone, LLP
Unified Patents
Attorney Name: David L. McCombs
Haynes and Boone, LLP
Unified Patents
Attorney Name: Dina Blikshteyn
Haynes and Boone, LLP
Unified Patents
Attorney Name: Roshan S. Mansinghani
Unified Patents
Unified Patents
Attorney Name: Alyssa J. Holtslander
Unified Patents
Unified Patents
Attorney Name: Jung S Hahm
Unified Patents
Unified Patents
Attorney Name: Ashley F. Cheung
Unified Patents
Unified Patents
Attorney Name: Christopher K. Wilson
Unified Patents
Unified Patents
Attorney Name: Kevin W. Jakel
Intuit Inc.
Patent Owner Attorneys
5AutoBrilliance, LLC
Attorney Name: Jeffrey G. Toler
Toler Law Group
AutoBrilliance, LLC
Attorney Name: Benjamin R. Johnson
McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP
AutoBrilliance, LLC
Attorney Name: Robert R. Brunelli
Sheridan Ross
AutoBrilliance, LLC
Attorney Name: Brian S. Boerman
Sheridan Ross
AutoBrilliance, LLC
Attorney Name: Steven Goldberg
AutoBrilliance, LLC
Related Patents
Doc No | Title | Issue date |
---|---|---|
06792351 | Method and apparatus for multi-vehicle communication | Sep 14, 2004 |