Previous Posts
- December 2015 Featured Expert: Dr. Eva Künnemann
- November 2015 Featured Expert: Roland Stumpf
- [New Update] Supporting our business members and getting the word out!
- [New Update] Feedback Here, Feedback There, Feedback Everywhere!
- August 2015 Featured Expert: Nima Jabbari
- July 2015 Featured Expert: Mohit Yadav
- June 2015 Featured Expert: Simon Sunatori
- IP Matters Webinar Series: Defensive Publication - Advanced Strategies
- IP Matters Webinar Series: Patent Strategies for Startups
- May 2015 Featured Expert: Chris Seeto
- IP Matters Webinar Series: Patent Enforcement in China Webinar
- IP Matters Webinar Series: Patent Monetization
- IP Matters Webinar Series: Patents and Patent Types
- IP Matters Webinar Series: Defensive Publication
- IP Matters Webinar Series: Patents and Prior Art 101
- Contest Tips From the Patexia Team
- April 2015 Featured Expert: Seth W Perry
- The new Market Research Contest type
- Checking your Payment Status
- An Easier Explanation
- Bonus Points for NPL and Foreign Language
- A new Dashboard to track your progress
- The new Patent Mining Contest type
- How to Submit Multiple References in a Contest?
- Q4 2014 - The New Evidence of Use Contest Rules
- Q1 2014 - Rules and Feedback Review
- Just some technical difficulties, but we're back!
- Dealing with Plagarism
- Field Trip to the USPTO
- Record Prizes Available
- Private Study: Guaranteed Rewards
- Patexia on TV
- Straight from the White House - Crowdsourcing can Strengthen our Patent System
- Calling All Consultants
- Communicating Across Patexia
- I've Won a Contest, Now Where's My Money?
- Happy New Year
- Evidence of Use Studies
- Refer a Friend for Some Holiday Cash
- Dashboards Are Here
- What We're Thankful For
- Crafting a 103 Argument: A How To Guide
- Contest Rules Page and Leaderboard
- How to Lose $4,000 in a Patexia Contest?
- New Scores and More Feedback
- Patent Monetization Strategies
- Judging and Feedback 2.0
- The Business Member Experience
- Improved Production Value
- Technical Difficulties
- The Progenitor
- After a brief interlude...
- Randominity
- Defensive Publication
- The first quarter of 2013
- A Week Like Any Other
- Our First Webinar
- New, New, Newsletter and Webinar Trials and Tribulations
- Search skillz, Price Structures, Contest Winners, and the first wallpaper of the week?
- IP Matters Web Series
- Favorite Buzz Repost - El Plato Supreme
- Patexia's 2nd Monthly Newsletter
- Consulting Projects
- Two new contests
- Announcing Jetpack and Charge Pump Contest Winner!
- New Type of Contest: Commercial Use Search
- Jetpack Contest Results are in and the next contest at Patexia
- Happy Holidays | Jetpack Contest Closed
- Results are in for the Charge Pump Contest & announcing a new contest in jetpacks
- Big News: Patexia's First Prior Art Contest Successfully Concluded AND New Site Design Launched
- Patexia helps host TechZulu's Tech Crawl
- Patexia's First Prior Art Search Contest is Now Live.
- Messaging system back online
- Introducing: James McArdle
- New research database: PubMed
- Top contest participants will get invite to industry dinner
- Messaging Temporarily Disabled
- One contest ends and another begins!
- Voting open for Innovations in Health Care Spending Contest
- Patexia affected by Amazon outage
- Just a few days left in our first contest
- Patent search back up!
- Patent Search Temporarily Down
- Patexia's First Contest: Innovations in Health Care Spending
- 3/26/2012 - Check Out Patexia's Interest Pages
- 3/9/2012 -What's New on Patexia
Recently one of our users had a chance to take home $4,000 cash as the top prize from one of our contests. Unfortunately, He ended up missing out of the prize pool entirely. How?
The first reference that was submitted was solid and it was able to answer almost all of the contest questions. Detailed explanations were provided and the research team was quite impressed by the quality of the answers. The weighted relevancy score for this reference was 87. Now, where was the problem?
Four more references were submitted as part of the total contest entry. Unlike the first reference, these documents were not nearly as good and this brought down the average weighted relevancy score to a mediocre 58. Patexia uses the average weighted relevancy score in the final contest rankings so this user was left on the outside looking in.
Again, we want to emphasize the fact that we are looking for QUALITY rather than QUANTITY. Of course you are welcome to submit more than one reference to a contest, however just be sure that everything you include as part of your entry is something that you consider prize-worthy. If only the first reference had been submitted in this scenario, the user would have walked away $4,000 richer.