
Mark A. Fleischer
Examiner (ID: 3740)
| Most Active Art Unit | 3629 |
| Art Unit(s) | 3624, 3623, 3629 |
| Total Applications | 394 |
| Issued Applications | 209 |
| Pending Applications | 4 |
| Abandoned Applications | 184 |
Applications
| Application number | Title of the application | Filing Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
Array
(
[id] => 6130113
[patent_doc_number] => 20110087517
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2011-04-14
[patent_title] => 'Targeted Equipment Monitoring System and Method for Optimizing Equipment Reliability'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 12/901842
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2010-10-11
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 12
[patent_figures_cnt] => 12
[patent_no_of_words] => 12508
[patent_no_of_claims] => 35
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 2
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] => publications/A1/0087/20110087517.pdf
[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 12901842
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 12/901842 | Targeted equipment monitoring system and method for optimizing equipment reliability | Oct 10, 2010 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 6130441
[patent_doc_number] => 20110087614
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2011-04-14
[patent_title] => 'SYSTEM FOR REPRESENTING AN ORGANIZATION'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 12/901960
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2010-10-11
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 2
[patent_figures_cnt] => 2
[patent_no_of_words] => 3642
[patent_no_of_claims] => 17
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 2
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] => publications/A1/0087/20110087614.pdf
[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 12901960
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 12/901960 | SYSTEM FOR REPRESENTING AN ORGANIZATION | Oct 10, 2010 | Abandoned |
Array
(
[id] => 6066843
[patent_doc_number] => 20110202473
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2011-08-18
[patent_title] => 'Progressive Refinement Model for Business Processes'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 12/897592
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2010-10-04
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 17
[patent_figures_cnt] => 17
[patent_no_of_words] => 8162
[patent_no_of_claims] => 1
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 1
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] => publications/A1/0202/20110202473.pdf
[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 12897592
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 12/897592 | Progressive refinement model for business processes | Oct 3, 2010 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 8097003
[patent_doc_number] => 20120084109
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2012-04-05
[patent_title] => 'Decisioning Guidelines And Framework'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 12/897241
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2010-10-04
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 10
[patent_figures_cnt] => 10
[patent_no_of_words] => 4160
[patent_no_of_claims] => 25
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 4
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] => publications/A1/0084/20120084109.pdf
[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 12897241
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 12/897241 | Decisioning Guidelines And Framework | Oct 3, 2010 | Abandoned |
Array
(
[id] => 8097015
[patent_doc_number] => 20120084116
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2012-04-05
[patent_title] => 'METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING WHETHER TO ALLOW CREATION OF A CONTENT CHANNEL'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 12/897142
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2010-10-04
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 4
[patent_figures_cnt] => 4
[patent_no_of_words] => 7913
[patent_no_of_claims] => 20
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] => publications/A1/0084/20120084116.pdf
[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 12897142
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 12/897142 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING WHETHER TO ALLOW CREATION OF A CONTENT CHANNEL | Oct 3, 2010 | Abandoned |
Array
(
[id] => 6040444
[patent_doc_number] => 20110093493
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2011-04-21
[patent_title] => 'BUILDING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SITE CATEGORIES'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 12/896842
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2010-10-01
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 62
[patent_figures_cnt] => 62
[patent_no_of_words] => 14047
[patent_no_of_claims] => 20
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 5
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] => publications/A1/0093/20110093493.pdf
[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 12896842
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 12/896842 | BUILDING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SITE CATEGORIES | Sep 30, 2010 | Abandoned |
Array
(
[id] => 8551774
[patent_doc_number] => 08326668
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => B2
[patent_issue_date] => 2012-12-04
[patent_title] => 'Managing encounters with persons'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 12/872042
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2010-08-31
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 4
[patent_figures_cnt] => 4
[patent_no_of_words] => 4488
[patent_no_of_claims] => 25
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 154
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 12872042
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 12/872042 | Managing encounters with persons | Aug 30, 2010 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 6393442
[patent_doc_number] => 20100318389
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2010-12-16
[patent_title] => 'BUSINESS FLOW PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 12/849163
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2010-08-03
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 47
[patent_figures_cnt] => 47
[patent_no_of_words] => 16356
[patent_no_of_claims] => 7
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] => publications/A1/0318/20100318389.pdf
[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 12849163
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 12/849163 | BUSINESS FLOW PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS | Aug 2, 2010 | Abandoned |
Array
(
[id] => 14269937
[patent_doc_number] => 10284548
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => B2
[patent_issue_date] => 2019-05-07
[patent_title] => System and method for strong remote identity proofing
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/386546
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2010-08-02
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 2
[patent_figures_cnt] => 2
[patent_no_of_words] => 2586
[patent_no_of_claims] => 20
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 335
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13386546
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/386546 | System and method for strong remote identity proofing | Aug 1, 2010 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 8775012
[patent_doc_number] => 08428986
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => B2
[patent_issue_date] => 2013-04-23
[patent_title] => 'Return on investment analysis tool for storage systems'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 12/847164
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2010-07-30
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 26
[patent_figures_cnt] => 27
[patent_no_of_words] => 13504
[patent_no_of_claims] => 18
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 4
[patent_words_short_claim] => 203
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 12847164
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 12/847164 | Return on investment analysis tool for storage systems | Jul 29, 2010 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 8574343
[patent_doc_number] => 08341002
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => B2
[patent_issue_date] => 2012-12-25
[patent_title] => 'Diagnostic system and method for home appliance'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 12/846040
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2010-07-29
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 8
[patent_figures_cnt] => 10
[patent_no_of_words] => 16924
[patent_no_of_claims] => 23
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 2
[patent_words_short_claim] => 170
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 12846040
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 12/846040 | Diagnostic system and method for home appliance | Jul 28, 2010 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 7735272
[patent_doc_number] => 20120016833
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2012-01-19
[patent_title] => 'SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DYNAMIC PROCESS MODEL RECONFIGURATION BASED ON PROCESS EXECUTION CONTEXT'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 12/836262
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2010-07-14
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 16
[patent_figures_cnt] => 16
[patent_no_of_words] => 13375
[patent_no_of_claims] => 23
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] => publications/A1/0016/20120016833.pdf
[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 12836262
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 12/836262 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DYNAMIC PROCESS MODEL RECONFIGURATION BASED ON PROCESS EXECUTION CONTEXT | Jul 13, 2010 | Abandoned |
Array
(
[id] => 6139643
[patent_doc_number] => 20110010213
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2011-01-13
[patent_title] => 'METHOD FOR CAPTURING AND REPORTING RELEVANT CROP GENOTYPE-SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE INFORMATION TO SCIENTISTS FOR CONTINUED CROP GENETIC IMPROVEMENT'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 12/833840
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2010-07-09
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 8
[patent_figures_cnt] => 8
[patent_no_of_words] => 5173
[patent_no_of_claims] => 28
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] => publications/A1/0010/20110010213.pdf
[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 12833840
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 12/833840 | METHOD FOR CAPTURING AND REPORTING RELEVANT CROP GENOTYPE-SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE INFORMATION TO SCIENTISTS FOR CONTINUED CROP GENETIC IMPROVEMENT | Jul 8, 2010 | Abandoned |
Array
(
[id] => 8259704
[patent_doc_number] => 08209215
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => B1
[patent_issue_date] => 2012-06-26
[patent_title] => 'Assessing value added by associating an entity with a project'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 12/822840
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2010-06-24
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 5
[patent_figures_cnt] => 6
[patent_no_of_words] => 8776
[patent_no_of_claims] => 25
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 5
[patent_words_short_claim] => 186
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 12822840
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 12/822840 | Assessing value added by associating an entity with a project | Jun 23, 2010 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 7658144
[patent_doc_number] => 20110307413
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2011-12-15
[patent_title] => 'PREDICTING THE IMPACT OF A PERSONNEL ACTION ON A WORKER'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 12/815799
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2010-06-15
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 16
[patent_figures_cnt] => 16
[patent_no_of_words] => 6409
[patent_no_of_claims] => 18
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] => publications/A1/0307/20110307413.pdf
[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 12815799
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 12/815799 | PREDICTING THE IMPACT OF A PERSONNEL ACTION ON A WORKER | Jun 14, 2010 | Abandoned |
Array
(
[id] => 7658034
[patent_doc_number] => 20110307303
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2011-12-15
[patent_title] => 'DETERMINING EMPLOYEE CHARACTERISTICS USING PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 12/814756
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2010-06-14
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 16
[patent_figures_cnt] => 16
[patent_no_of_words] => 6418
[patent_no_of_claims] => 13
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] => publications/A1/0307/20110307303.pdf
[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 12814756
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 12/814756 | DETERMINING EMPLOYEE CHARACTERISTICS USING PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS | Jun 13, 2010 | Abandoned |
Array
(
[id] => 6640063
[patent_doc_number] => 20100312615
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2010-12-09
[patent_title] => 'Multi-Vendor Registration and Rewards System'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 12/796264
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2010-06-08
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 6
[patent_figures_cnt] => 6
[patent_no_of_words] => 6977
[patent_no_of_claims] => 13
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] => publications/A1/0312/20100312615.pdf
[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 12796264
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 12/796264 | Multi-Vendor Registration and Rewards System | Jun 7, 2010 | Abandoned |
Array
(
[id] => 7588197
[patent_doc_number] => 20110282708
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2011-11-17
[patent_title] => 'INTEGRATING EXTERNAL DATA IN HUMAN WORKFLOW TASKS'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 12/780340
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2010-05-14
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 8
[patent_figures_cnt] => 8
[patent_no_of_words] => 4669
[patent_no_of_claims] => 15
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] => publications/A1/0282/20110282708.pdf
[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 12780340
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 12/780340 | INTEGRATING EXTERNAL DATA IN HUMAN WORKFLOW TASKS | May 13, 2010 | Abandoned |
Array
(
[id] => 13652131
[patent_doc_number] => 09852382
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => B2
[patent_issue_date] => 2017-12-26
[patent_title] => Dynamic human workflow task assignment using business rules
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 12/780356
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2010-05-14
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 6
[patent_figures_cnt] => 6
[patent_no_of_words] => 4641
[patent_no_of_claims] => 15
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 484
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 12780356
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 12/780356 | Dynamic human workflow task assignment using business rules | May 13, 2010 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 11831122
[patent_doc_number] => 09727868
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => B2
[patent_issue_date] => 2017-08-08
[patent_title] => 'Determining targeted incentives based on consumer transaction history'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 12/773765
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2010-05-04
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 11
[patent_figures_cnt] => 12
[patent_no_of_words] => 15823
[patent_no_of_claims] => 31
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 4
[patent_words_short_claim] => 239
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 12773765
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 12/773765 | Determining targeted incentives based on consumer transaction history | May 3, 2010 | Issued |