
Michael J. Metzger
Examiner (ID: 19567, Phone: (571)272-3105 , Office: P/2182 )
| Most Active Art Unit | 2182 |
| Art Unit(s) | 2182, 2183 |
| Total Applications | 577 |
| Issued Applications | 477 |
| Pending Applications | 65 |
| Abandoned Applications | 48 |
Applications
| Application number | Title of the application | Filing Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
Array
(
[id] => 11775078
[patent_doc_number] => 09384004
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => B2
[patent_issue_date] => 2016-07-05
[patent_title] => 'Randomized testing within transactional execution'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/524796
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2012-06-15
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 20
[patent_figures_cnt] => 25
[patent_no_of_words] => 30416
[patent_no_of_claims] => 14
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 2
[patent_words_short_claim] => 253
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13524796
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/524796 | Randomized testing within transactional execution | Jun 14, 2012 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 11213702
[patent_doc_number] => 09442737
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => B2
[patent_issue_date] => 2016-09-13
[patent_title] => 'Restricting processing within a processor to facilitate transaction completion'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/524833
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2012-06-15
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 26
[patent_figures_cnt] => 31
[patent_no_of_words] => 32896
[patent_no_of_claims] => 20
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 154
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13524833
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/524833 | Restricting processing within a processor to facilitate transaction completion | Jun 14, 2012 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 11563600
[patent_doc_number] => 09626189
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => B2
[patent_issue_date] => 2017-04-18
[patent_title] => 'Reducing operand store compare penalties'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/524356
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2012-06-15
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 9
[patent_figures_cnt] => 11
[patent_no_of_words] => 8263
[patent_no_of_claims] => 19
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 275
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13524356
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/524356 | Reducing operand store compare penalties | Jun 14, 2012 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 10556150
[patent_doc_number] => 09280351
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => B2
[patent_issue_date] => 2016-03-08
[patent_title] => 'Second-level branch target buffer bulk transfer filtering'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/524306
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2012-06-15
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 8
[patent_figures_cnt] => 8
[patent_no_of_words] => 8617
[patent_no_of_claims] => 14
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 531
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13524306
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/524306 | Second-level branch target buffer bulk transfer filtering | Jun 14, 2012 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 9200327
[patent_doc_number] => 20130339642
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2013-12-19
[patent_title] => 'SAVING/RESTORING SELECTED REGISTERS IN TRANSACTIONAL PROCESSING'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/524882
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2012-06-15
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 23
[patent_figures_cnt] => 23
[patent_no_of_words] => 28999
[patent_no_of_claims] => 17
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 5
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13524882
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/524882 | Saving/restoring selected registers in transactional processing | Jun 14, 2012 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 8588599
[patent_doc_number] => 20130007420
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2013-01-03
[patent_title] => 'CHECKING THE INTEGRITY OF A PROGRAM EXECUTED BY AN ELECTRONIC CIRCUIT'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/524456
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2012-06-15
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 3
[patent_figures_cnt] => 3
[patent_no_of_words] => 2663
[patent_no_of_claims] => 10
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 1
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13524456
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/524456 | Checking the integrity of a program executed by an electronic circuit | Jun 14, 2012 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 9200380
[patent_doc_number] => 20130339695
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2013-12-19
[patent_title] => 'ASYNCHRONOUS LOOKAHEAD SECOND LEVEL BRANCH TARGET BUFFER'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/524311
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2012-06-15
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 11
[patent_figures_cnt] => 11
[patent_no_of_words] => 9958
[patent_no_of_claims] => 20
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13524311
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/524311 | Asynchronous lookahead hierarchical branch prediction | Jun 14, 2012 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 11598650
[patent_doc_number] => 09645819
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => B2
[patent_issue_date] => 2017-05-09
[patent_title] => 'Method and apparatus for reducing area and complexity of instruction wakeup logic in a multi-strand out-of-order processor'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/524240
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2012-06-15
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 8
[patent_figures_cnt] => 9
[patent_no_of_words] => 6793
[patent_no_of_claims] => 30
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 263
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13524240
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/524240 | Method and apparatus for reducing area and complexity of instruction wakeup logic in a multi-strand out-of-order processor | Jun 14, 2012 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 9200351
[patent_doc_number] => 20130339666
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2013-12-19
[patent_title] => 'SPECIAL CASE REGISTER UPDATE WITHOUT EXECUTION'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/524471
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2012-06-15
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 6
[patent_figures_cnt] => 6
[patent_no_of_words] => 5635
[patent_no_of_claims] => 6
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 2
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13524471
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/524471 | SPECIAL CASE REGISTER UPDATE WITHOUT EXECUTION | Jun 14, 2012 | Abandoned |
Array
(
[id] => 10575828
[patent_doc_number] => 09298469
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => B2
[patent_issue_date] => 2016-03-29
[patent_title] => 'Management of multiple nested transactions'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/524330
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2012-06-15
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 24
[patent_figures_cnt] => 29
[patent_no_of_words] => 29975
[patent_no_of_claims] => 20
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 307
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13524330
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/524330 | Management of multiple nested transactions | Jun 14, 2012 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 11200029
[patent_doc_number] => 09430241
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => B2
[patent_issue_date] => 2016-08-30
[patent_title] => 'Semi-exclusive second-level branch target buffer'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/524314
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2012-06-15
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 6
[patent_figures_cnt] => 6
[patent_no_of_words] => 7413
[patent_no_of_claims] => 7
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 1
[patent_words_short_claim] => 279
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13524314
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/524314 | Semi-exclusive second-level branch target buffer | Jun 14, 2012 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 10589486
[patent_doc_number] => 09311101
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => B2
[patent_issue_date] => 2016-04-12
[patent_title] => 'Intra-instructional transaction abort handling'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/524370
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2012-06-15
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 21
[patent_figures_cnt] => 26
[patent_no_of_words] => 25763
[patent_no_of_claims] => 7
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 1
[patent_words_short_claim] => 302
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13524370
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/524370 | Intra-instructional transaction abort handling | Jun 14, 2012 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 9150499
[patent_doc_number] => 20130305022
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2013-11-14
[patent_title] => 'Speeding Up Younger Store Instruction Execution after a Sync Instruction'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/470386
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2012-05-14
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 9
[patent_figures_cnt] => 9
[patent_no_of_words] => 10591
[patent_no_of_claims] => 21
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13470386
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/470386 | Speeding up younger store instruction execution after a sync instruction | May 13, 2012 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 9150489
[patent_doc_number] => 20130305012
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2013-11-14
[patent_title] => 'IMPLEMENTATION OF COUNTERS USING TRACE HARDWARE'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/468670
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2012-05-10
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 6
[patent_figures_cnt] => 6
[patent_no_of_words] => 4496
[patent_no_of_claims] => 15
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13468670
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/468670 | IMPLEMENTATION OF COUNTERS USING TRACE HARDWARE | May 9, 2012 | Abandoned |
Array
(
[id] => 9150494
[patent_doc_number] => 20130305017
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2013-11-14
[patent_title] => 'COMPILED CONTROL CODE PARALLELIZATION BY HARDWARE TREATMENT OF DATA DEPENDENCY'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/466389
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2012-05-08
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 6
[patent_figures_cnt] => 6
[patent_no_of_words] => 5795
[patent_no_of_claims] => 20
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13466389
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/466389 | COMPILED CONTROL CODE PARALLELIZATION BY HARDWARE TREATMENT OF DATA DEPENDENCY | May 7, 2012 | Abandoned |
Array
(
[id] => 11509127
[patent_doc_number] => 09600288
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => B1
[patent_issue_date] => 2017-03-21
[patent_title] => 'Result bypass cache'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/465372
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2012-05-07
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 8
[patent_figures_cnt] => 8
[patent_no_of_words] => 10884
[patent_no_of_claims] => 25
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 4
[patent_words_short_claim] => 193
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13465372
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/465372 | Result bypass cache | May 6, 2012 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 9137414
[patent_doc_number] => 20130298129
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2013-11-07
[patent_title] => 'CONTROLLING A SEQUENCE OF PARALLEL EXECUTIONS'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/465179
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2012-05-07
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 6
[patent_figures_cnt] => 6
[patent_no_of_words] => 5681
[patent_no_of_claims] => 20
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13465179
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/465179 | CONTROLLING A SEQUENCE OF PARALLEL EXECUTIONS | May 6, 2012 | Abandoned |
Array
(
[id] => 9137197
[patent_doc_number] => 20130297912
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2013-11-07
[patent_title] => 'APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DYNAMIC ALLOCATION OF EXECUTION QUEUES'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/462993
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2012-05-03
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 6
[patent_figures_cnt] => 6
[patent_no_of_words] => 6749
[patent_no_of_claims] => 20
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13462993
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/462993 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DYNAMIC ALLOCATION OF EXECUTION QUEUES | May 2, 2012 | Abandoned |
Array
(
[id] => 9137195
[patent_doc_number] => 20130297910
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2013-11-07
[patent_title] => 'MITIGATION OF THREAD HOGS ON A THREADED PROCESSOR USING A GENERAL LOAD/STORE TIMEOUT COUNTER'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/463319
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2012-05-03
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 6
[patent_figures_cnt] => 6
[patent_no_of_words] => 7180
[patent_no_of_claims] => 20
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13463319
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/463319 | MITIGATION OF THREAD HOGS ON A THREADED PROCESSOR USING A GENERAL LOAD/STORE TIMEOUT COUNTER | May 2, 2012 | Abandoned |
Array
(
[id] => 9137196
[patent_doc_number] => 20130297911
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2013-11-07
[patent_title] => 'CHECKPOINTED BUFFER FOR RE-ENTRY FROM RUNAHEAD'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/463627
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2012-05-03
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 6
[patent_figures_cnt] => 6
[patent_no_of_words] => 5878
[patent_no_of_claims] => 20
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13463627
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/463627 | Checkpointed buffer for re-entry from runahead | May 2, 2012 | Issued |