
Peter D. Coughlan
Examiner (ID: 14356)
| Most Active Art Unit | 2129 |
| Art Unit(s) | 2122, 2129, 2121 |
| Total Applications | 624 |
| Issued Applications | 387 |
| Pending Applications | 14 |
| Abandoned Applications | 227 |
Applications
| Application number | Title of the application | Filing Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
Array
(
[id] => 8769073
[patent_doc_number] => 20130097110
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2013-04-18
[patent_title] => 'SYSTEM FOR RECOMMENDING ADVICE BASED ON USER PSYCHOLOGY INDEX'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/807982
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2011-09-20
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 12
[patent_figures_cnt] => 12
[patent_no_of_words] => 6441
[patent_no_of_claims] => 11
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 2
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13807982
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/807982 | SYSTEM FOR RECOMMENDING ADVICE BASED ON USER PSYCHOLOGY INDEX | Sep 19, 2011 | Abandoned |
Array
(
[id] => 7714718
[patent_doc_number] => 20120005753
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2012-01-05
[patent_title] => 'INTRUSIVE SOFTWARE MANAGEMENT'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/230544
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2011-09-12
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 10
[patent_figures_cnt] => 10
[patent_no_of_words] => 11207
[patent_no_of_claims] => 33
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] => publications/A1/0005/20120005753.pdf
[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13230544
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/230544 | Intrusive software management | Sep 11, 2011 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 7710914
[patent_doc_number] => 20120003622
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2012-01-05
[patent_title] => 'METHOD FOR INTERACTIVE LEARNING AND TRAINING'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/230747
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2011-09-12
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 4
[patent_figures_cnt] => 4
[patent_no_of_words] => 5537
[patent_no_of_claims] => 16
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 4
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13230747
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/230747 | METHOD FOR INTERACTIVE LEARNING AND TRAINING | Sep 11, 2011 | Abandoned |
Array
(
[id] => 10144234
[patent_doc_number] => 09177042
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => B2
[patent_issue_date] => 2015-11-03
[patent_title] => 'Determining quality of tier assignments'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/210797
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2011-08-16
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 9
[patent_figures_cnt] => 9
[patent_no_of_words] => 5944
[patent_no_of_claims] => 19
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 229
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13210797
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/210797 | Determining quality of tier assignments | Aug 15, 2011 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 7588312
[patent_doc_number] => 20110282823
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2011-11-17
[patent_title] => 'SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ANNOTATING AND RANKING REVIEWS WITH INFERRED ANALYTICS'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/191556
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2011-07-27
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 7
[patent_figures_cnt] => 7
[patent_no_of_words] => 8421
[patent_no_of_claims] => 20
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 4
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] => publications/A1/0282/20110282823.pdf
[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13191556
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/191556 | System and method for annotating and ranking reviews with inferred analytics | Jul 26, 2011 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 8831270
[patent_doc_number] => 20130132315
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2013-05-23
[patent_title] => 'CLASSIFICATION USING CORRENTROPY'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/811317
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2011-07-22
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 15
[patent_figures_cnt] => 15
[patent_no_of_words] => 5221
[patent_no_of_claims] => 19
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 4
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13811317
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/811317 | Classification using correntropy | Jul 21, 2011 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 10901102
[patent_doc_number] => 08924339
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => B1
[patent_issue_date] => 2014-12-30
[patent_title] => 'Semi-supervised and unsupervised generation of hash functions'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/183939
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2011-07-15
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 7
[patent_figures_cnt] => 7
[patent_no_of_words] => 10783
[patent_no_of_claims] => 36
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 353
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13183939
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/183939 | Semi-supervised and unsupervised generation of hash functions | Jul 14, 2011 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 8119539
[patent_doc_number] => 08160991
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => B2
[patent_issue_date] => 2012-04-17
[patent_title] => 'Automated estimation of a country where a client computer is configured to operate'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/179478
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2011-07-08
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 11
[patent_figures_cnt] => 11
[patent_no_of_words] => 5863
[patent_no_of_claims] => 20
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 5
[patent_words_short_claim] => 106
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent
[pdf_file] => patents/08/160/08160991.pdf
[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13179478
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/179478 | Automated estimation of a country where a client computer is configured to operate | Jul 7, 2011 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 8734790
[patent_doc_number] => 20130080359
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2013-03-28
[patent_title] => 'ASSISTING VEHICLE GUIDANCE OVER TERRAIN'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/702765
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2011-07-05
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 6
[patent_figures_cnt] => 6
[patent_no_of_words] => 5064
[patent_no_of_claims] => 14
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 2
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13702765
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/702765 | Assisting vehicle guidance over terrain | Jul 4, 2011 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 8855153
[patent_doc_number] => 20130144828
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2013-06-06
[patent_title] => 'MODIFICATION OF DESCRIPTION LOGIC EXPRESSIONS'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/805620
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2011-06-21
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 6
[patent_figures_cnt] => 6
[patent_no_of_words] => 3905
[patent_no_of_claims] => 21
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 5
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13805620
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/805620 | Modification of description logic expressions | Jun 20, 2011 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 7503402
[patent_doc_number] => 20110264613
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2011-10-27
[patent_title] => 'METHODS, APPARATUS AND SYSTEMS USING PROBABILISTIC TECHNIQUES IN TRENDING AND PROFILING'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/163949
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2011-06-20
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 10
[patent_figures_cnt] => 10
[patent_no_of_words] => 5554
[patent_no_of_claims] => 20
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 4
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] => publications/A1/0264/20110264613.pdf
[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13163949
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/163949 | METHODS, APPARATUS AND SYSTEMS USING PROBABILISTIC TECHNIQUES IN TRENDING AND PROFILING | Jun 19, 2011 | Abandoned |
Array
(
[id] => 10085633
[patent_doc_number] => 09122981
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => B1
[patent_issue_date] => 2015-09-01
[patent_title] => 'Detecting unexpected behavior'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/160989
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2011-06-15
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 3
[patent_figures_cnt] => 3
[patent_no_of_words] => 5911
[patent_no_of_claims] => 23
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 200
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13160989
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/160989 | Detecting unexpected behavior | Jun 14, 2011 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 9891307
[patent_doc_number] => 08977580
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => B2
[patent_issue_date] => 2015-03-10
[patent_title] => 'Defect classification apparatus'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/703536
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2011-06-08
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 5
[patent_figures_cnt] => 6
[patent_no_of_words] => 12170
[patent_no_of_claims] => 4
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 1
[patent_words_short_claim] => 882
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13703536
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/703536 | Defect classification apparatus | Jun 7, 2011 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 7492391
[patent_doc_number] => 20110238607
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2011-09-29
[patent_title] => 'GRAPH EMBEDDING TECHNIQUES'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/156172
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2011-06-08
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 11
[patent_figures_cnt] => 11
[patent_no_of_words] => 15277
[patent_no_of_claims] => 16
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] => publications/A1/0238/20110238607.pdf
[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13156172
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/156172 | Graph embedding techniques | Jun 7, 2011 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 8504148
[patent_doc_number] => 20120303556
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2012-11-29
[patent_title] => 'COMPARISON OF MODELING AND INFERENCE METHODS AT MULTIPLE SPATIAL RESOLUTIONS'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/117169
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2011-05-27
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 8
[patent_figures_cnt] => 8
[patent_no_of_words] => 6270
[patent_no_of_claims] => 20
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13117169
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/117169 | COMPARISON OF MODELING AND INFERENCE METHODS AT MULTIPLE SPATIAL RESOLUTIONS | May 26, 2011 | Abandoned |
Array
(
[id] => 6116332
[patent_doc_number] => 20110191175
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2011-08-04
[patent_title] => 'Determining a Meaning of a Knowledge Item Using Document Based Information'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/084377
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2011-04-11
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 5
[patent_figures_cnt] => 5
[patent_no_of_words] => 5753
[patent_no_of_claims] => 21
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] => publications/A1/0191/20110191175.pdf
[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13084377
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/084377 | Determining a meaning of a knowledge item using document based information | Apr 10, 2011 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 8246905
[patent_doc_number] => 08204845
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => B2
[patent_issue_date] => 2012-06-19
[patent_title] => 'Movement of an agent that utilizes a compiled set of canonical rules'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/048338
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2011-03-15
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 25
[patent_figures_cnt] => 25
[patent_no_of_words] => 10441
[patent_no_of_claims] => 36
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 6
[patent_words_short_claim] => 98
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent
[pdf_file] => patents/08/204/08204845.pdf
[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13048338
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/048338 | Movement of an agent that utilizes a compiled set of canonical rules | Mar 14, 2011 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 8383007
[patent_doc_number] => 20120226640
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2012-09-06
[patent_title] => 'Behavior and information model to yield more accurate probability of successful outcome'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/039202
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2011-03-02
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 4
[patent_figures_cnt] => 4
[patent_no_of_words] => 2854
[patent_no_of_claims] => 15
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13039202
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/039202 | Behavior and information model to yield more accurate probability of successful outcome | Mar 1, 2011 | Issued |
Array
(
[id] => 8517658
[patent_doc_number] => 20120317066
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2012-12-13
[patent_title] => 'INTEREST LEVEL MEASUREMENT SYSTEM, INTEREST LEVEL MEASUREMENT DEVICE, INTEREST LEVEL MEASUREMENT METHOD, AND INTEREST LEVEL MEASUREMENT PROGRAM'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/579500
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2011-02-17
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 35
[patent_figures_cnt] => 35
[patent_no_of_words] => 32435
[patent_no_of_claims] => 11
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 5
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13579500
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/579500 | INTEREST LEVEL MEASUREMENT SYSTEM, INTEREST LEVEL MEASUREMENT DEVICE, INTEREST LEVEL MEASUREMENT METHOD, AND INTEREST LEVEL MEASUREMENT PROGRAM | Feb 16, 2011 | Abandoned |
Array
(
[id] => 6116515
[patent_doc_number] => 20110191272
[patent_country] => US
[patent_kind] => A1
[patent_issue_date] => 2011-08-04
[patent_title] => 'METHODS AND SYSTEMS OF EFFECTIVELY MANAGING UV EXPOSURE'
[patent_app_type] => utility
[patent_app_number] => 13/019013
[patent_app_country] => US
[patent_app_date] => 2011-02-01
[patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00
[patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 5
[patent_figures_cnt] => 5
[patent_no_of_words] => 6925
[patent_no_of_claims] => 15
[patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3
[patent_words_short_claim] => 0
[patent_maintenance] => 1
[patent_no_of_assignments] => 0
[patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication
[pdf_file] => publications/A1/0191/20110191272.pdf
[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13019013
[rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>) 13/019013 | Methods and systems of effectively managing UV exposure | Jan 31, 2011 | Issued |