Richard A Rosenberger

Array ( [id] => 9270702 [patent_doc_number] => 20140025620 [patent_country] => US [patent_kind] => A1 [patent_issue_date] => 2014-01-23 [patent_title] => 'INFERRING USER MOOD BASED ON USER AND GROUP CHARACTERISTIC DATA' [patent_app_type] => utility [patent_app_number] => 13/556023 [patent_app_country] => US [patent_app_date] => 2012-07-23 [patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00 [patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 7 [patent_figures_cnt] => 7 [patent_no_of_words] => 13756 [patent_no_of_claims] => 27 [patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 5 [patent_words_short_claim] => 0 [patent_maintenance] => 1 [patent_no_of_assignments] => 0 [patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication [pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13556023 [rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>)

Array ( [id] => 9940311 [patent_doc_number] => 08990139 [patent_country] => US [patent_kind] => B1 [patent_issue_date] => 2015-03-24 [patent_title] => 'Framework for flexible cognitive perception and action selection' [patent_app_type] => utility [patent_app_number] => 13/556014 [patent_app_country] => US [patent_app_date] => 2012-07-23 [patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00 [patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 12 [patent_figures_cnt] => 14 [patent_no_of_words] => 6853 [patent_no_of_claims] => 13 [patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3 [patent_words_short_claim] => 220 [patent_maintenance] => 1 [patent_no_of_assignments] => 0 [patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent [pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13556014 [rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>)

Array ( [id] => 9506656 [patent_doc_number] => 08744986 [patent_country] => US [patent_kind] => B2 [patent_issue_date] => 2014-06-03 [patent_title] => 'Effort estimation using text analysis' [patent_app_type] => utility [patent_app_number] => 13/548694 [patent_app_country] => US [patent_app_date] => 2012-07-13 [patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00 [patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 4 [patent_figures_cnt] => 4 [patent_no_of_words] => 5335 [patent_no_of_claims] => 14 [patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 2 [patent_words_short_claim] => 152 [patent_maintenance] => 1 [patent_no_of_assignments] => 0 [patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent [pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13548694 [rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>)

Array ( [id] => 11220936 [patent_doc_number] => 09449275 [patent_country] => US [patent_kind] => B2 [patent_issue_date] => 2016-09-20 [patent_title] => 'Actuation of a technical system based on solutions of relaxed abduction' [patent_app_type] => utility [patent_app_number] => 14/232315 [patent_app_country] => US [patent_app_date] => 2012-07-02 [patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00 [patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 2 [patent_figures_cnt] => 3 [patent_no_of_words] => 7218 [patent_no_of_claims] => 20 [patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3 [patent_words_short_claim] => 162 [patent_maintenance] => 1 [patent_no_of_assignments] => 0 [patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent [pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 14232315 [rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>)

Array ( [id] => 10157675 [patent_doc_number] => 09189455 [patent_country] => US [patent_kind] => B2 [patent_issue_date] => 2015-11-17 [patent_title] => 'Adaptive weighted stochastic gradient descent' [patent_app_type] => utility [patent_app_number] => 13/482344 [patent_app_country] => US [patent_app_date] => 2012-05-29 [patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00 [patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 6 [patent_figures_cnt] => 6 [patent_no_of_words] => 6163 [patent_no_of_claims] => 20 [patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 5 [patent_words_short_claim] => 192 [patent_maintenance] => 1 [patent_no_of_assignments] => 0 [patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent [pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13482344 [rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>)

Array ( [id] => 9176027 [patent_doc_number] => 20130318012 [patent_country] => US [patent_kind] => A1 [patent_issue_date] => 2013-11-28 [patent_title] => 'Processing of Information' [patent_app_type] => utility [patent_app_number] => 13/481215 [patent_app_country] => US [patent_app_date] => 2012-05-25 [patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00 [patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 2 [patent_figures_cnt] => 2 [patent_no_of_words] => 6433 [patent_no_of_claims] => 13 [patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3 [patent_words_short_claim] => 0 [patent_maintenance] => 1 [patent_no_of_assignments] => 0 [patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication [pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13481215 [rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>)

Array ( [id] => 9176041 [patent_doc_number] => 20130318026 [patent_country] => US [patent_kind] => A1 [patent_issue_date] => 2013-11-28 [patent_title] => 'ADAPTIVE COMPUTATIONAL GRID FOR INVERSE PROBLEMS' [patent_app_type] => utility [patent_app_number] => 13/481583 [patent_app_country] => US [patent_app_date] => 2012-05-25 [patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00 [patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 9 [patent_figures_cnt] => 9 [patent_no_of_words] => 12443 [patent_no_of_claims] => 27 [patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 4 [patent_words_short_claim] => 0 [patent_maintenance] => 1 [patent_no_of_assignments] => 0 [patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication [pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13481583 [rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>)

Array ( [id] => 11258837 [patent_doc_number] => 09483737 [patent_country] => US [patent_kind] => B2 [patent_issue_date] => 2016-11-01 [patent_title] => 'Identifying an event associated with consumption of a utility' [patent_app_type] => utility [patent_app_number] => 14/118219 [patent_app_country] => US [patent_app_date] => 2012-05-18 [patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00 [patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 18 [patent_figures_cnt] => 28 [patent_no_of_words] => 16288 [patent_no_of_claims] => 35 [patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 4 [patent_words_short_claim] => 142 [patent_maintenance] => 1 [patent_no_of_assignments] => 0 [patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent [pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 14118219 [rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>)

Array ( [id] => 10556425 [patent_doc_number] => 09280626 [patent_country] => US [patent_kind] => B2 [patent_issue_date] => 2016-03-08 [patent_title] => 'Efficiently determining Boolean satisfiability with lazy constraints' [patent_app_type] => utility [patent_app_number] => 13/458252 [patent_app_country] => US [patent_app_date] => 2012-04-27 [patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00 [patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 6 [patent_figures_cnt] => 8 [patent_no_of_words] => 7777 [patent_no_of_claims] => 6 [patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 1 [patent_words_short_claim] => 312 [patent_maintenance] => 1 [patent_no_of_assignments] => 0 [patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent [pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13458252 [rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>)

Array ( [id] => 9563267 [patent_doc_number] => 20140180980 [patent_country] => US [patent_kind] => A1 [patent_issue_date] => 2014-06-26 [patent_title] => 'INFORMATION IDENTIFICATION METHOD, PROGRAM PRODUCT, AND SYSTEM' [patent_app_type] => utility [patent_app_number] => 14/234747 [patent_app_country] => US [patent_app_date] => 2012-04-26 [patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00 [patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 11 [patent_figures_cnt] => 11 [patent_no_of_words] => 4879 [patent_no_of_claims] => 18 [patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3 [patent_words_short_claim] => 0 [patent_maintenance] => 1 [patent_no_of_assignments] => 0 [patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication [pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 14234747 [rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>)

Array ( [id] => 8568297 [patent_doc_number] => 20120330868 [patent_country] => US [patent_kind] => A1 [patent_issue_date] => 2012-12-27 [patent_title] => 'MATCHING APPARATUS AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM' [patent_app_type] => utility [patent_app_number] => 13/444187 [patent_app_country] => US [patent_app_date] => 2012-04-11 [patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00 [patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 35 [patent_figures_cnt] => 35 [patent_no_of_words] => 24442 [patent_no_of_claims] => 5 [patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3 [patent_words_short_claim] => 0 [patent_maintenance] => 1 [patent_no_of_assignments] => 0 [patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication [pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13444187 [rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>)

Array ( [id] => 8314612 [patent_doc_number] => 20120191634 [patent_country] => US [patent_kind] => A1 [patent_issue_date] => 2012-07-26 [patent_title] => 'STORAGE POLICY EVALUATION IN A COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT' [patent_app_type] => utility [patent_app_number] => 13/436948 [patent_app_country] => US [patent_app_date] => 2012-04-01 [patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00 [patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 8 [patent_figures_cnt] => 8 [patent_no_of_words] => 3761 [patent_no_of_claims] => 20 [patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3 [patent_words_short_claim] => 0 [patent_maintenance] => 1 [patent_no_of_assignments] => 0 [patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication [pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13436948 [rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>)

Array ( [id] => 8279602 [patent_doc_number] => 20120173469 [patent_country] => US [patent_kind] => A1 [patent_issue_date] => 2012-07-05 [patent_title] => 'EFFORT ESTIMATION USING TEXT ANALYSIS' [patent_app_type] => utility [patent_app_number] => 13/417416 [patent_app_country] => US [patent_app_date] => 2012-03-12 [patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00 [patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 5 [patent_figures_cnt] => 5 [patent_no_of_words] => 5336 [patent_no_of_claims] => 9 [patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 2 [patent_words_short_claim] => 0 [patent_maintenance] => 1 [patent_no_of_assignments] => 0 [patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication [pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13417416 [rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>)

Array ( [id] => 9035892 [patent_doc_number] => 20130238530 [patent_country] => US [patent_kind] => A1 [patent_issue_date] => 2013-09-12 [patent_title] => 'SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING WIND POWER SCENARIOS FOR WIND-POWER-INTEGRATED STOCHASTIC UNIT COMMITMENT PROBLEMS' [patent_app_type] => utility [patent_app_number] => 13/414122 [patent_app_country] => US [patent_app_date] => 2012-03-07 [patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00 [patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 5 [patent_figures_cnt] => 5 [patent_no_of_words] => 9563 [patent_no_of_claims] => 26 [patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 4 [patent_words_short_claim] => 0 [patent_maintenance] => 1 [patent_no_of_assignments] => 0 [patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication [pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13414122 [rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>)

Array ( [id] => 9986064 [patent_doc_number] => 09031798 [patent_country] => US [patent_kind] => B2 [patent_issue_date] => 2015-05-12 [patent_title] => 'Systems and methods for solving large scale stochastic unit commitment problems' [patent_app_type] => utility [patent_app_number] => 13/414044 [patent_app_country] => US [patent_app_date] => 2012-03-07 [patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00 [patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 4 [patent_figures_cnt] => 4 [patent_no_of_words] => 14819 [patent_no_of_claims] => 13 [patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 2 [patent_words_short_claim] => 180 [patent_maintenance] => 1 [patent_no_of_assignments] => 0 [patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent [pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13414044 [rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>)

Array ( [id] => 8855148 [patent_doc_number] => 20130144823 [patent_country] => US [patent_kind] => A1 [patent_issue_date] => 2013-06-06 [patent_title] => 'APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR EXTENDING A DEFAULT MODEL OF A TERMINAL' [patent_app_type] => utility [patent_app_number] => 13/406916 [patent_app_country] => US [patent_app_date] => 2012-02-28 [patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00 [patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 7 [patent_figures_cnt] => 7 [patent_no_of_words] => 5316 [patent_no_of_claims] => 20 [patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 4 [patent_words_short_claim] => 0 [patent_maintenance] => 1 [patent_no_of_assignments] => 0 [patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication [pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13406916 [rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>)

Array ( [id] => 9005715 [patent_doc_number] => 20130226840 [patent_country] => US [patent_kind] => A1 [patent_issue_date] => 2013-08-29 [patent_title] => 'Deriving a Nested Chain of Densest Subgraphs from a Graph' [patent_app_type] => utility [patent_app_number] => 13/406843 [patent_app_country] => US [patent_app_date] => 2012-02-28 [patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00 [patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 9 [patent_figures_cnt] => 9 [patent_no_of_words] => 2810 [patent_no_of_claims] => 15 [patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 2 [patent_words_short_claim] => 0 [patent_maintenance] => 1 [patent_no_of_assignments] => 0 [patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication [pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13406843 [rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>)

Array ( [id] => 9005714 [patent_doc_number] => 20130226839 [patent_country] => US [patent_kind] => A1 [patent_issue_date] => 2013-08-29 [patent_title] => 'ROBUST BAYESIAN MATRIX FACTORIZATION AND RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS USING SAME' [patent_app_type] => utility [patent_app_number] => 13/405796 [patent_app_country] => US [patent_app_date] => 2012-02-27 [patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00 [patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 5 [patent_figures_cnt] => 5 [patent_no_of_words] => 8172 [patent_no_of_claims] => 20 [patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3 [patent_words_short_claim] => 0 [patent_maintenance] => 1 [patent_no_of_assignments] => 0 [patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication [pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13405796 [rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>)

Array ( [id] => 9679997 [patent_doc_number] => 08818923 [patent_country] => US [patent_kind] => B1 [patent_issue_date] => 2014-08-26 [patent_title] => 'Neural network device with engineered delays for pattern storage and matching' [patent_app_type] => utility [patent_app_number] => 13/358095 [patent_app_country] => US [patent_app_date] => 2012-01-25 [patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00 [patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 11 [patent_figures_cnt] => 11 [patent_no_of_words] => 6846 [patent_no_of_claims] => 8 [patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 2 [patent_words_short_claim] => 184 [patent_maintenance] => 1 [patent_no_of_assignments] => 0 [patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => patent [pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13358095 [rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>)

Array ( [id] => 8941520 [patent_doc_number] => 20130191317 [patent_country] => US [patent_kind] => A1 [patent_issue_date] => 2013-07-25 [patent_title] => 'NoGood Generation Based on Search Tree Depth' [patent_app_type] => utility [patent_app_number] => 13/358335 [patent_app_country] => US [patent_app_date] => 2012-01-25 [patent_effective_date] => 0000-00-00 [patent_drawing_sheets_cnt] => 7 [patent_figures_cnt] => 7 [patent_no_of_words] => 7408 [patent_no_of_claims] => 22 [patent_no_of_ind_claims] => 3 [patent_words_short_claim] => 0 [patent_maintenance] => 1 [patent_no_of_assignments] => 0 [patent_current_assignee] =>[type] => publication [pdf_file] =>[firstpage_image] =>[orig_patent_app_number] => 13358335 [rel_patent_id] =>[rel_patent_doc_number] =>)