·Is It Possible Apply + Newton III Motion Law as Dynamic System in a Motor Engine
Is it Possible to Apply Physically Newton's Third Law of Motion as a Dynamic Cycle System in a Motor Device in a + Positive Way?
3rd Thermodynamic Law Applicate in a Power-Plant Device. The Reaction at From of the Action. New Torque Power. It’s a simple Plus Formula of the Interaction of the Two Powers: 1/Action, + 2/Reaction = Retrodynamic. / For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. 2 Forces in 1 System.
RETRODYNAMIC Effect - Dextrogiro => vs <= Levogiro Phenomena Effect. / Rotor/RPM VS InFlow/Way. 2dn Thermodynamic Law Applicated in a Power-Plant Device. The Reaction at From of the Action. New Torque Power. Its a simple Pluse Formula of the Interaction of the Two Powers: 1/Accion, + 2/Reaction = Retrodynamic.
"Changing rotation inside a mass makes it possible to change its inertial properties. It is the equation for a jet motion without rejection of any mass.” Albert Einstein.
The logic of creation of an inertial propulsion system is thus: Any motion is rotation ---- Rotation of a matter generates a space-time Torsion ---Torsion of space - time is described by Ricci torsion --- Ricci torsion is an inertial field-----the rest mass of any object is determined by its inertial field---- operating by fields and forces of inertia inside of mass we can create inertial propulsion system which moves according to the equation [m (t) dv/dt =-vdm/dt].
Newton's Third Law of Motion: III. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
It is the sum of both (two) Forces - one to other / Are two Forces in one system.
The formula of the Retrodinamic effect is a simple mathematical summation. What is Dextrogiro plus Levogiro, gives the result of the sum, of what is the total, which is the retrodynamic effect. But keeps doing Exponential.
Retrodynamic Effect, are two Forces Actives in one system. It's like when the Star Trek Enterprise Spaceship Accelerates into the depth of space but spinning 2Two Opposites Forces (Like the Ying-Yang Concept) on a Central Axis in a Rotary Manner Way.
I always explain it well, but another thing is that you don't understand it. As if it were an everyday question.
And they don't take it as a disruption, which changes schemes.
Because they really wouldn't even know about it. Being a subject that nobody has ever really dealt with.
And also to you can see it as an encripted information. And I know the best translator, for sure. And they don't take it as a disruption, which changes schemes. Because they really wouldn't even know about it. Being a subject that nobody has ever really dealt with. But the concept it's a simple sum, then keep going to increase the phenomenal interaction. Let me make a simple caparison: One Turn is One step, OK, Well in this particular case. When you do One Turn is One Step, And Then is another turn are gone to be Two Steps. And in the next turn are gone to be Four steps, And the next Turn are gone to be 8 Steps. Etc... Really to to be able to explain it, needs to invent a new Mathematical Signal. Brand New. I Tell You. Its Like That.
I'm going to explain them perfectly well. We are going to make a comparison that each turn of the Rotor (applied in my case/Gearturbine) is a Step. It's fine. And So now when the rotor rotates with the power of the mechanical drive (Action). And furthermore, it has the internal flow contrary to its rotation (Reaction), but in favor of the individual blade attached to the gear with planetary rotation that activates the Rotor. In such a case they are two forces in a single system.
Maybe it doesn't have the best translation, but that's something else, that's not the point. But that would in no way be something that could belittle his qualities and technical virtues. And at the end of the day, all the explanations you can have are in the operation of the system. And this could not be easier to appreciate, Summed up in a simple sum. And in this case of 2Two Forces: 1Action + 2Reaction Applied in a single cycle, and thus also a single system.
Note: ·I use the "VS" Because the dynamic interaction is front to front, that's why. ·And is Added force one to the other, that's why I use the Sume/Plus mathematical symbol. ·A, B, and C are the same situation with a different word, from a different, technical view.
Other Note: If somebody doesn't understand Cut be because of some reason. Not because my responsibility.
I deal with the Requirements of a new mathematical symbol, in order to explain the Retrodynamic Phenomenon that occurs in an invention that I am developing. It is called the "Retrodynamic Effect" and it is created by having a situation of an axis turning in the opposite direction in a rotating system and in this way a great force is created. And there is currently no mathematical symbol that can explain it.