Search
Patexia Interest Groups

Intellectual Property > Nova Content

Arctic Cat v. Bombardier deals with obviousness, patent marking, reasonable royalties, willfulness and enhanced damages. The panel affirms all of the district... Read More »
In a recent development with the ongoing complex litigation involving Janssen Biotech’s arthritis biologic medicine Remicade (infliximab) and Celltrion’s... Read More »
We do not usually report on district court cases, but the Columbia Sportswear v. Seirus design patent case handled by our firm is particularly interesting, given the... Read More »
Keeping secrets in business: Organisations hold business-critical intangible assets that perfectly fit even the strictest definition for a valuable trade secret. ... Read More »
.In the Micron Tech case, the Circuit rules that TC Heartland changed the law on patent venue such that Micron’s argument of improper venue is now much easier... Read More »
On October 16, 2017, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s ruling that the claims in Secured Mail Solutions LLC, v. Universal Wilde, Inc... Read More »
In Sanofi v. Watson Labs., the Circuit affirms a determination of induced infringement of one patent and direct infringement of another, thus assuring Sanofi another... Read More »
Inter-Partes Review (IPR) is known as an effective, relatively low cost (compared to district court litigation) and quick method used by defendants as a defense... Read More »
Music festivals, film festivals, food festivals….festivals are popular venues for entertainment and each festival strives to offer the consumer a unique... Read More »
On October 19, 2017 Hush Hush Sound Inc, Michael David, and Tyler Blake (collectively “Plaintiffs”) also known as the Electronic dance music duo... Read More »
In Bayer v. Watson, the panel throws out Bayer’s patent to its Staxyn erectile dysfunction drug as being obvious, noting that the district court focused too... Read More »
Judgments and Awards On October 3, 2017, a federal court in Miami, FL awarded TM Brands $1,500,000 pursuant to a stipulated agreement reached during trial. ... Read More »
A pair of ongoing USPTO initiatives, Patents for Humanity and Patents 4 Patients, offer incentives that certain biotechnology patent applications may be eligible... Read More »
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: When the America Invents Act was passed in 2011, most of us saw the inter partes review process as a streamlined, relatively inexpensive procedure... Read More »
Inter-Partes Review (IPR) has become an integral part of patent defense strategy. However, our analysis of IPR institution rate shows that it has steadily been... Read More »
In Merck v. Hospira, the only precedential case decided this week, a majority of the panel affirms a determination of obviousness, noting that despite the objective... Read More »
Trade Secrets: Trade secrets protection is a timely topic. Over the past few years the relevant laws and business landscape have changed dramatically. The ... Read More »
Previous posts (e.g., here and here) have discussed trademarks that are “merely descriptive” of the goods or services.  Although the registration... Read More »
Written by Peter E. Heuser, Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C. In Smart Systems v. Chicago Transit Authority, the Circuit affirms the dismissal of a case based ... Read More »
Written by Caleb A. Bates, Ph.D., Peter Law and Eric Furman, Ph.D. Sovereign immunity refers to the doctrine that the government cannot be sued without its... Read More »
Menu