Intellectual Property > Nova Content
In Regeneron Pharmaceuticals v. Merus N.V., Appeal No. 2016-1346 (Fed. Cir., July 27, 2017), a split three-judge panel of Prost, Wallach and Newman (Newman... Read More »
Written by Scott Forbes and Andrew Schwaab
In Shipping and Transit, LLC v. Hall Enterprises, Inc., a district court recently held that a patent infringement case... Read More »
Written by Loni Morrow, Vicki Nee and Susan Natland
Trademark law is an important form of protection for the fashion and beauty industry. It protects both... Read More »
Written by Peter E. Heuser, Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C.
The Circuit issued only one precedential patent case this week, reversing a determination of... Read More »
In the 2003 panel decision in Schering Corp. v. Geneva Pharm., Inc., the panel rejected “the contention that inherent anticipation requires recognition [of the... Read More »
Written by Nicole R. Townes and Catherine Holland
Edited by Jeff Van Hoosear
As discussed in our previous blog post Puma Treads New Territory Hitting... Read More »
Judge Gilstrap Singled Out in Congressional Hearing as Defying SCOTUS
Yesterday, the House IP Subcommittee on the Courts, Intellectual Property and the Internet... Read More »
Previous posts (e.g., here, here and here) discussed the patent enforcement activity of Celgard, a North Carolina company that manufactures specialty membranes and... Read More »
Written by Peter E. Heuser, Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C.
In AdjustaCam v. Newegg, the Circuit reverses the denial of attorney fees where Judge Gilstrap... Read More »
In Genband US LLC v. Metaswitch Networks Corp., [2017-1148] (July 1-, 2017), the Federal Circuit vacated the denial of a permanent injunction and remanded for... Read More »
In the first half of 2017, we saw a continued decline in patent litigation. District court litigation was down 14 percent to 2,039, compared to 2,482 in the first... Read More »
Written by Chang Lim and Michael L. Fuller
Introduction
On May 23, 2017, the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (“District... Read More »
Written by Jeff Van Hoosear and Jonathan Menkes
Edited by Catherine Holland
In a recent precedential decision, In re University of Miami, Serial No. 86616382... Read More »
Ariosa was a decision that essentially held that the novel discovery of a naturally-occurring phenomenon could not per se meet the Mayo/Alice requirement for an... Read More »
Written by Vicki Y. Nee and Ian W. Gillies
Edited by Loni Morrow and Catherine Holland
On June 1, 2017, noted music and fashion photographer Danny Clinch... Read More »
Written by Peter E. Heuser, Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C.
In EmeraChem v Volkswagen the Circuit reverses a determination of obviousness because the... Read More »
Written by Peter E. Heuser, Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C.
In NexLearn the Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a patent infringement case for lack of... Read More »
Over the last couple of weeks, we have reported the top five firms in Inter-Partes Review (IPR) from the perspectives of volume and performance during the period from ... Read More »
Are You Properly Corroborating Your In Re Katz Declarations?
Every so often a decision comes out of the USPTO's Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) or the... Read More »
Last week, we reported on the top five market leaders who represented petitioners and patent owners in Inter-Partes Review (IPR) from 2012 through the end of 2016... Read More »