IP Litigation > Nova Content
CASE OF THE WEEK
In re: Nitro Fluids L.L.C., Appeal No. 2020-142 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 28, 2020)
In the Court’s only precedential patent opinion this week... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK
TecSec, Inc. v. Adobe, Inc., Appeal Nos. 2019-2192, -2258 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 23, 2020)
In our Case of the Week, the Federal Circuit issued a... Read More »
Comments
Oct 30, 2020
Update: Thanks to one of our readers who discovered an error in our ITC numbers for Q3. We have already updated the article with the correct data.
The third... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK
Immunex Corp. v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Appeal Nos. 2019-1749, -1777 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 13, 2020)
In our Case of the Week, the Federal Circuit ... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK
AntennaSys, Inc. v. AQYR Techs., Inc., Appeal No. 2019-2244 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 7, 2020)
In the only precedential opinion issued by the Federal... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK
GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Appeal No. 2018-1976, -2023 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 2, 2020)
Our Case of the Week focuses on... Read More »
Joinder Estoppel Narrower Than Original Petition Estoppel
Court’s have struggled with the meaning of the “reasonably could have raised” aspect... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK
Apple Inc. v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Appeal No. 2018-1456, -1457 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 25, 2020)
In our Case of the Week, the Federal Circuit... Read More »
NETWORK-1 TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY
Before Prost, Newman, and Bryson. Appeal from the United States... Read More »
PTAB Seeks Public Input
Based on stakeholder feedback, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has added an online form (here) to the USPTO website that allows... Read More »
table td {font-size: 12px !important;}table td a {font-size: 12px !important;}table th{font-size: 12px !important;}
Earlier this month we released our 2020 IPR... Read More »
Transitional CBM Challenge Program Sunsets Today
The America Invents Act (AIA) placed an expiration date on Covered Business Method (CBM) challenges. That... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK
Facebook, Inc. v. Windy City Innovations, LLC, Appeal Nos. 2018-1400 et al. (Fed. Cir. Sept. 4, 2020)
The only precedential decision... Read More »
SECURITY PEOPLE, INC. v. IANCU
Before Lourie, Wallach, and Hughes. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California... Read More »
The PTAB has been grappling with how to manage IPR petitions for patents that are also being challenged in federal district court, particularly when the district... Read More »
If the PTAB Fee Model is Biased, Patent Owners Have Much Bigger Problems
Recently, a due process challenge has been raised to the PTAB fee model in New Vision... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK
Illumina, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc., Appeal No. 2019-1419 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 3, 2020)
Our Case of the Week this week is a rehash of a... Read More »
ALACRITECH, INC. V. INTEL CORP., CAVIUM, LLC, DELL, INC.
Before Stoll, Chen, and Moore. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: The... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK
American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. v. Neapco Holdings LLC, Appeal No. 2018-1763 (Fed. Cir. July 31, 2020)
In this week’s Case of... Read More »
CAFC Refuses Remand on 112 6th Deficiencies
When challenging claims at the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB), Rule 42.104(b)(3) requires a Petitioner to... Read More »