IP Litigation > Nova Content
CASE OF THE WEEK
In Re: Marco Guldenaar Holding B.V., Appeal No. 2017-2465 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 28, 2018)
The Federal Circuit affirmed the final written decision... Read More »
Happy New Year! We have decided to write more often in 2019 as many of our readers have asked us to bring back our popular Patexia Insight series. Our goal is to... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK
VirnetX Inc. v. Apple, Inc., Appeal Nos. 2017-2490, -2494 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 10, 2018)
The Federal Circuit affirmed two final written decisions... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. v. Plano Encryption Technologies LLC, Appeal No. 2016-2700 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 7, 2018)
On Friday, the Federal... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK
Maxchief Investments Ltd. v. Wok & Pan, Ind., Inc., Appeal No. 2018-1121 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 29, 2018)
In its only precedential patent... Read More »
Even Preliminary Proceeding Arguments Notice the Public
It is well-established that statements made by a Patent Owner during an inter partes review (IPR) can... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK
Enplas Display Device Corp. v. Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Appeal No. 2106-2599 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 19, 2018)
In an appeal from a jury verdict ... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK
ArcelorMittal Atlantique Et Lorraine v. AK Steel Corporation, Appeal No. 2017-1637 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 14, 2018)
In an opinion originally filed... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK
Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., Appeal Nos. 2017-2084, -2085, -2095, -2096, -2097, -2098, -2099, -2117, 2118 (Fed. Cir. Nov... Read More »
On November 7, 2018, the Fed. Cir. issued a summary affirmance of the PTAB’s interference decision of September 6, 2016, in Kumar v. Sung (Patent Interference... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK
GoPro, Inc. v. Contour IP Holding, LLC, Appeal Nos. 2017-1894, -1936 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 1, 2018)
In its only precedential decision in the past... Read More »
On October 11, 2018, the USPTO published a Final Rule in the Federal Register, adopting a new standard for interpreting claims in trial proceedings before the patent... Read More »
Leveraging PTAB 101 Determinations in Parallel Litigation
Covered Business Method (CBM) challenges have fallen out of favor with petitioners. This is due to a... Read More »
The quote is from “Treasure of the Sierra Madre” when a bandido leader is trying to convince Bogart that his gang are Federales, and Bogie asks to see... Read More »
Invalidity Contentions Serve as Estoppel Benchmark
A Patent Owner may only avail itself of an IPR estoppel defense in court upon demonstrating that a competent... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK
Data Engine Technologies, LLC v. Google LLC, Appeal No. 2017-1135 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 9, 2018)
In one of two Section 101 cases this week, the... Read More »
After much deliberation, the USPTO has published a Final Rule mandating that the claim construction standard articulated by the Fed. Cir. in Phillips v. AWH Corp... Read More »
Final Rule Publishes Tomorrow
As predicted last week, the final rule package to switch the to the Phillips claim construction for AIA trial proceedings at the... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK
Natural Alternatives International, Inc. v. Iancu, Appeal No. 2017-1962 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 1, 2018)
In an appeal from an inter partes... Read More »
CASE OF THE WEEK
Gust, Inc. v. AlphaCap Ventures, LLC, Appeal No. 2017-2414 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 28, 2018)
In an appeal from a district court decision awarding... Read More »