IP Litigation > Nova Content
Written by Chang Lim and Michael L. Fuller
Introduction
On May 23, 2017, the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (“District... Read More »
Written by Vikas Bhargava and Kerry S. Taylor, Ph.D.
In an order issued in Petroleum Geo-Services Inc. v. Westerngeco LLC, IPR2016-00407, IPR2016-00499, Paper 29... Read More »
Written by Clayton R. Henson and Kerry S. Taylor, Ph.D.
Previously, we reported the outcomes of remands from the Federal Circuit to the PTAB in IPR cases through... Read More »
Written by Keith Lim and Maria Anderson
Note: an Addendum has been added to this previously published article.
In Ex Parte Hafner, the U.S. Patent and... Read More »
Written by Daniel K. Yarbrough, Ph.D. and Benjamin Anger
The PTAB granted-in-part a patent owner’s motion to substitute claims based on evidence of... Read More »
Written by Keith Lim and Vlad Teplitskiy
In a precedential opinion, the Federal Circuit affirmed the determination by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board... Read More »
Over the last couple of weeks, we have reported the top five firms in Inter-Partes Review (IPR) from the perspectives of volume and performance during the period from ... Read More »
Are You Properly Corroborating Your In Re Katz Declarations?
Every so often a decision comes out of the USPTO's Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) or the... Read More »
Written by Scott R. Seeley and Andrea Cheek
The Federal Circuit upheld an IPR final written decision by the PTAB holding that MindGeek’s claims were... Read More »
Last week, we reported on the top five market leaders who represented petitioners and patent owners in Inter-Partes Review (IPR) from 2012 through the end of 2016... Read More »
Written by Jeffrey C. Wu, Ph.D. and Ben J. Everton
The Supreme Court granted a petition for writ of certiorari to address whether inter partes review – an... Read More »
Written by Peter E. Heuser, Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C.
Six precedential patent cases decided by the Circuit this week dealt with personal jurisdiction... Read More »
Since its inception in September 2012, Inter-Partes Review (IPR) has emerged as a powerful tool to challenge the validity of patents in lawsuits. We have... Read More »
In Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. Guardian Protection Services, Inc., [2016-2521] (June 5, 2017), the Federal Circuit reversed and remanded the... Read More »
Unified Patents' Offers First Quantitative Study of TC Heartland Impact
Since TC Heartland v. LLC D/B/A Heartland Food Products Group V. Kraft Foods Group... Read More »
Written by Nathanael Luman, Ph.D. and Kerry S. Taylor, Ph.D.
The Supreme Court granted a petition for writ of certiorari to address whether the PTAB is required... Read More »
Written by Peter Law and Kerry S. Taylor, Ph.D.
On May 23, 2017, the PTAB granted the University of Maryland’s (UM) motion to terminate inter partes review... Read More »
Written by Nathanael Luman, Ph.D. and Scott Raevsky
The PTAB denied Apple’s motion to withdraw both its IPR petition and concurrent motion for joinder to... Read More »
Written by Casey D. Donahoe, Ph.D. and Benjamin Anger
The Federal Circuit vacated and remanded the PTAB’s final written decision holding that claims... Read More »
Written by David J. Grant and Nathanael Luman, Ph.D.
The Federal Circuit held that statements made by a patent owner in an IPR, whether before or after... Read More »