IP Litigation > Nova Content
We recently studied the PTAB data and suggested that although the rise and fall in litigation indirectly affected the rise and fall in IPR challenges, the true driver ... Read More »
The Inter Partes Review (IPR) and Covered Business Method (CBM) procedures were enacted on September 16, 2012. Since then, the PTAB has released data on a monthly... Read More »
This week at Patexia, we asked our data science team to look into the most popular U.S. district courts for patent litigation. This is important in light of the... Read More »
Polaroid v. Kodak, concluded in 1991 after 15 years, was the first “billion dollar” patent damages award ($909 million). Until this year, it... Read More »
By Joshua Davenport and Aseet Patel
While the number of decisions holding claims to be patent eligible under the two-part Alice test has been few and far between, ... Read More »
Since the America Invents Act (AIA) became effective on September 16, 2012, the Inter-Partes Review (IPR) has drawn significant attention. Additionally, discussion... Read More »
Comments
Van EconomouIt is the low hanging fruit phenomenon. The patents which had obvious (pun intended) problems were the first to be IPR'd and with time these were harder to find.
Aug 3, 2016
Pedram SameniMost likely that's what happened. We believe the quality of patents in new cases should generally be higher.
Aug 3, 2016
Seventy-one percent of patent claims for which inter partes review are instituted are canceled. You knew that. You knew your patent was subject to IPR cancelation by... Read More »
This morning government Accountability Office (GAO) released the result of 1.5 years research on issues related to patent quality, non-practicing entities, and high... Read More »
This week, the Patexia Data Science Team analyzed the recent patent litigation data obtained from PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records) to understand ... Read More »
After a decade of disputes and lobbying, Ukraine has finally joined the countries with special IP courts or patent courts, namely the United Kingdom, the... Read More »
This Thursday there will be another Patexia IP Matters webinar, this time by Mr. Manny Schecter, Chief patent Counsel of IBM who is going to focus on Alice Case... Read More »
Comments
Anonymous Has Alice Case impacted the filing rate at IBM?
Feb 24, 2016
Anonymous Is there another Supreme Court case that can change the path for software patents?
Feb 24, 2016
In my most recent post, I discuss a recent article in IAM by Unified Patents that shows data about how IPRs are used to settle patent infringement cases. I ... Read More »
The revised Federal Rules of Civil Procedure contain changes that may impact patent litigation at the district court level. The revised rules went into effect on... Read More »
2015 has been an interesting year in the IP space. Aggressive lobbying has kept patent reform in the spotlight in both Congress and the media, with the patent... Read More »
The days of fight or settle are over for companies facing patent litigation. During the last several years, the US patent landscape has shifted dramatically... Read More »
Over the past few years, patent reform has rapidly escalated from a niche debate to a hot topic making headlines in the US and around the world. Fervor surrounding... Read More »
On May 5th Europe jumped one of the last major hurdles on the way to implementing the EU Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court (UPC). The Court of Justice of the EU ... Read More »
Every year numerous articles are written about intellectual property protection in China. Usually coverage is from the perspective of the damage done to foreign... Read More »
Currently there are two competing patent reform bills making the rounds in Congress: Representative Goodlatte’s Innovation Act of 2015 and the Strong Patent Act ... Read More »
With the America Invents Act still hot off the press with less than 5 years in effect, Congress is already debating two new patent reform proposals. We are still very ... Read More »