American Honda Motor Co., Inc. et al. v. Neo Wireless LLC > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2023-00794
Filing Date Mar 30, 2023
Institution Decision Date Oct 10, 2023
Decision Date Oct 10, 2023
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status Institution Denied
Administrative JudgesMatthew S. Meyers, Hyun J. Jung, Stephen E. Belisle
Judge Writing the Final DecisionMatthew S. Meyers
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
8Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Attorney Name: Thomas A. Rozylowicz
Fish & Richardson
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Attorney Name: John T. Johnson
Fish & Richardson
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Attorney Name: Jeffrey C. Mok
Fish & Richardson
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Attorney Name: Won S. Yoon
Fish & Richardson
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Attorney Name: Dianna Bradley
Fish & Richardson
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Attorney Name: Sylvia Hall-Ellis
San José State University
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Attorney Name: R. Michael Buehrer
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Attorney Name: Leonard J. Cimini Jr.
University of Delaware
Patent Owner Attorneys
3Neo Wireless LLC
Attorney Name: Kenneth Weatherwax
Lowenstein & Weatherwax
Neo Wireless LLC
Attorney Name: Parham Hendifar
Lowenstein & Weatherwax
Neo Wireless LLC
Attorney Name: Hamad M. Hamad
Caldwell Cassady & Curry
Related Patents
| Doc No | Title | Issue date |
|---|---|---|
| 10833908 | Channel probing signal for a broadband communication system | Nov 10, 2020 |
