Case number 2019-50659
Arunachalam v. Intuit > Documents
| Date Field | Doc. No. | Description (Pages) |
|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2020 | 2 | SUPREME COURT ORDER received dismissing petition for writ of certiorari filed by Appellant Ms. Lakshmi Arunachalam in 19-50659 on 05/18/2020. [9316115-1] [19-50659] (SBS) [Entered: 05/19/2020 11:07 AM] (0) |
| Mar 11, 2020 | 1 | SUPREME COURT NOTICE that petition for writ of certiorari [9268547-2] was filed by Appellant Ms. Lakshmi Arunachalam on 03/03/2020. Supreme Court Number: 19-7910. [19-50659] (SMC) [Entered: 03/11/2020 08:38 AM] (0) |
| Dec 4, 2019 | 2 | COURT ORDER denying as moot Motion for judicial notice filed by Appellant Ms. Lakshmi Arunachalam [9195402-2] [19-50659] (MBC) [Entered: 12/04/2019 11:14 AM] (0) |
| Dec 4, 2019 | 2 | COURT ORDER denying Motion for reconsideration filed by Appellant Ms. Lakshmi Arunachalam [9191295-2] [19-50659] (MBC) [Entered: 12/04/2019 11:12 AM] (0) |
| Nov 22, 2019 | 6 | MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Lakshmi Arunachalam for judicial notice [9195402-2]. Date of service: 11/22/2019 via email - Appellant Arunachalam; Attorney for Appellees: Sacksteder, Ware [19-50659] (Lakshmi Arunachalam ) [Entered: 11/22/2019 07:01 AM] (0) |
| Nov 18, 2019 | 26 | MOTION for reconsideration of the 10/23/2019 court order granting motion to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction filed by Appellee Intuit, Incorporated in 19-50659, [9159764-2] denying as moot motion to transfer appeal filed by Appellee Intuit, Incorporated in 19-50659. [9159764-3] [9191295-2] Date of service: 11/18/2019. [19-50659]REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: PETITION filed by Appellant Ms. Lakshmi Arunachalam for rehearing [9191295-2]. Date of Service: 11/18/2019 via email - Appellant Arunachalam; Attorney for Appellees: Sacksteder, Ware [19-50659] (Lakshmi Arunachalam ) [Entered: 11/18/2019 08:28 AM] (0) |
| Oct 31, 2019 | 3 | COURT ORDER: Upon consideration of appellant's unopposed motion for reconsideration, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART, in that Appellant shall file her motion and brief regarding rehearing/reconsideration on or before Wednesday, NOVEMBER 20, 2019; and DENIED in part as to all other relief sought. [9179479-2]; [9177578-2]; [9177578-2] [19-50659] (PAC) [Entered: 10/31/2019 02:17 PM] (0) |
| Oct 30, 2019 | 13 | UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Lakshmi Arunachalam for reconsideration of order denying extend the time to file a rehearing until 12/09/2019 [9179479-2]. Date of service: 10/30/2019 via email - Appellant Arunachalam; Attorney for Appellees: Sacksteder, Ware [19-50659] (Lakshmi Arunachalam ) [Entered: 10/30/2019 02:22 PM] (0) |
| Oct 29, 2019 | 1 | CLERK ORDER denying Motion to extend the time to file a petition for rehearing filed by Appellant Ms. Lakshmi Arunachalam [9177578-2] [19-50659] (MBC) [Entered: 10/29/2019 04:29 PM] (0) |
| Oct 29, 2019 | 9 | MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Lakshmi Arunachalam to extend the time to file a rehearing until 12/09/2019 [9177578-2]. Date of service: 10/29/2019 via email - Appellant Arunachalam; Attorney for Appellees: Sacksteder, Ware [19-50659] (Lakshmi Arunachalam ) [Entered: 10/29/2019 07:06 AM] (0) |
| Oct 25, 2019 | 62 | DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN on various motions received from Appellant Ms. Lakshmi Arunachalam In light of issuance of court's mandate [19-50659] (MBC) [Entered: 10/25/2019 10:22 AM] (0) |
| Oct 23, 2019 | 2 | COURT ORDER granting opposed Motion to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction ( see 28 USC Section 1295(a)(1). filed by Appellee Intuit, Incorporated [9159764-2]; denying as moot Motion to transfer appeal filed by Appellee Intuit, Incorporated [9159764-3]. [19-50659] (MBC) [Entered: 10/23/2019 03:27 PM] (0) |
| Oct 23, 2019 | 6 | OPPOSED MOTION to extend time to file brief of appellee to 11/29/19 [9173751-2]. [19-50659]REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: OPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellee Intuit, Incorporated to extend the time to file a response to the Appellant Brief [9156246-2] filed by Appellant Ms. Lakshmi Arunachalam until 11/29/2019 [9173751-2]. Date of service: 10/23/2019 via email - Appellant Arunachalam; Attorney for Appellees: Sacksteder, Ware [19-50659] (Jeffrey Ware ) [Entered: 10/23/2019 12:49 PM] (0) |
| Oct 17, 2019 | 2 | COURT ORDER granting Motion for leave to file a sur-reply filed by Appellant Ms. Lakshmi Arunachalam [9168832-2] [19-50659] (MBC) [Entered: 10/17/2019 10:08 AM] (0) |
| Oct 16, 2019 | 1 | CLERK ORDER granting Motion for leave for pro se to file electronically filed by Appellant Ms. Lakshmi Arunachalam [9167210-2] [19-50659] (MBC) [Entered: 10/16/2019 11:21 AM] (0) |
| Oct 16, 2019 | 20 | OPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Lakshmi Arunachalam to file sur reply (INCORPORATED in MOTION) [9168832-2] . Date of service: 10/16/2019 via email - Appellant Arunachalam; Attorney for Appellees: Sacksteder, Ware [19-50659] (Lakshmi Arunachalam ) [Entered: 10/16/2019 04:46 PM] (0) |
| Oct 16, 2019 | 17 | MOTION to recuse Judge W. Eugene Davis, Jerry E. Smith, Edith Brown Clement, Jennifer Walker Elrod, Stephen A. Higginson and Andrew S. Oldham from the panel, for judicial notice [9168873-3]. Document is insufficient for the following reasons: reference to related cases must be removed from cover, caption is incorrect; Certificate of Service is insufficient Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Reply due on 10/28/2019 for Appellant Lakshmi Arunachalam [19-50659]REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Lakshmi Arunachalam to recuse Judge Clement, Elrod, Oldham, Davis, Smith Higginson from the panel, for judicial notice [9168873-3]. Date of service: 10/16/2019 via email - Appellant Arunachalam; Attorney for Appellees: Sacksteder, Ware [19-50659] (Lakshmi Arunachalam ) [Entered: 10/16/2019 08:13 PM] (0) |
| Oct 15, 2019 | 7 | REPLY filed by Appellee Intuit, Incorporated [9167705-1] to the Response/Opposition filed by Appellant Ms. Lakshmi Arunachalam [9166234-2]. Date of Service: 10/15/2019 via US mail - Appellant Arunachalam; email - Attorney for Appellees: Sacksteder, Ware. [19-50659] (Jeffrey Ware ) [Entered: 10/15/2019 04:20 PM] (0) |
| Oct 11, 2019 | 6 | MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Lakshmi Arunachalam for leave to file electronically as a pro se party [9167210-2]. Date of service: 10/10/2019 [19-50659] (PAC) [Entered: 10/15/2019 11:56 AM] (0) |
| Oct 11, 2019 | 32 | RESPONSE/OPPOSITION filed by Ms. Lakshmi Arunachalam [9166234-1] to the Motion to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction filed by Appellee Intuit, Incorporated in 19-50659 [9159764-2] Response/Opposition deadline satisfied. Reply to Response/Opposition due on 10/17/2019. Date of Service: 10/10/2019. [19-50659] (PAC) [Entered: 10/11/2019 02:45 PM] (0) |
| Oct 4, 2019 | 0 | RESPONSE DUE to Motion to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction filed by Appellee Intuit, Incorporated in 19-50659 [9159764-2], Motion to transfer appeal filed by Appellee Intuit, Incorporated in 19-50659 [9159764-3]Response/Opposition due on 10/15/2019 [19-50659] (MBC) [Entered: 10/04/2019 03:34 PM] (0) |
| Oct 3, 2019 | 126 | MOTION filed by Appellee Intuit, Incorporated to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction [9159764-2], to transfer appeal to U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Date of service: 10/03/2019 via email - Appellant Arunachalam; US mail - Appellant Arunachalam [19-50659] (Jeffrey Ware ) [Entered: 10/03/2019 02:29 PM] (0) |
| Oct 3, 2019 | 0 | APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Jeffrey Ware for party(s) Appellee Intuit, Incorporated, in case 19-50659 [19-50659] (MBC) [Entered: 10/03/2019 02:10 PM] (0) |
| Oct 3, 2019 | 2 | APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-50659] (Jeffrey Ware ) [Entered: 10/03/2019 01:21 PM] (0) |
| Sep 30, 2019 | 50 | RECORD EXCERPTS FILED by Appellant Ms. Lakshmi Arunachalam. # of Copies Provided: 4 [19-50659] (MBC) [Entered: 09/30/2019 03:02 PM] (0) |
| Sep 30, 2019 | 71 | APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Ms. Lakshmi Arunachalam. A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Appellee's Brief due on 10/30/2019 for Appellee Intuit, Incorporated [19-50659] (MBC) [Entered: 09/30/2019 03:00 PM] (0) |
| Aug 30, 2019 | 1 | CLERK ORDER granting, in part, unopposed motion to extend time to file appellant's brief filed by Appellant Ms. Lakshmi Arunachalam. [9133433-2] A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 10/09/2019 for Appellant Lakshmi Arunachalam. [19-50659] (SEP) [Entered: 08/30/2019 02:50 PM] (0) |
| Aug 29, 2019 | 17 | UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Lakshmi Arunachalam to extend time to file brief as appellant until 10/28/2019. [9133433-2] Date of service: 08/28/2019. [19-50659] (SEP) [Entered: 08/29/2019 03:38 PM] (0) |
| Jul 31, 2019 | 4 | BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 09/09/2019 for Appellant Lakshmi Arunachalam. [19-50659] (CMB) [Entered: 07/31/2019 02:50 PM] (0) |
| Jul 31, 2019 | 0 | ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-50659] (CMB) [Entered: 07/31/2019 02:49 PM] (0) |
| Jul 25, 2019 | 0 | ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 6:19-CV-172. Electronic ROA due on 08/09/2019. [19-50659] (CB) [Entered: 07/25/2019 10:26 AM] (0) |
| Jul 25, 2019 | 3 | INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9105795-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-50659] (CB) [Entered: 07/25/2019 10:23 AM] (0) |
| Jul 25, 2019 | 0 | DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 07/18/2019 granting IFP for Appellant Mr. Lakshmi Arunachalam. [19-50659] (CB) [Entered: 07/25/2019 10:21 AM] (0) |
| Jul 17, 2019 | 28 | PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Lakshmi Arunachalam [19-50659] (MBC) [Entered: 07/17/2019 02:26 PM] (0) |
