Case number 2019-1223
Arunachalam v. Presidio Bank > Documents
| Date Field | Doc. No. | Description (Pages) |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2021 | 0 | ARUNACHALAM v. PRESIDIO BANK [OPINION] [nonprecedential] (0) |
| Oct 5, 2020 | 63 | The petition for writ of certiorari, No. 19-8708, filed on 06/05/2020, was Dismissed on 10/05/2020. [727030] [JAB] [Entered: 10/06/2020 02:32 PM] (1) |
| Jun 17, 2020 | 62 | Petition for writ of Certiorari filed on 06/05/2020, and placed on the docket 06/15/2020, in the Supreme Court of the United States. Supreme Court #: 19-8708, Lakshmi Arunachalam v. Presidio Bank. [701706] [JAB] [Entered: 06/17/2020 08:03 AM] (1) |
| Apr 16, 2020 | 61 | Mandate issued to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [687456] [JAB] [Entered: 04/16/2020 09:35 AM] (1) |
| Apr 9, 2020 | 60 | ORDER filed denying [58] petition for en banc rehearing filed by Lakshmi Arunachalam. By: En Banc (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [685544] [JAB] [Entered: 04/09/2020 10:56 AM] (2) |
| Mar 9, 2020 | 59 | 18 paper copies of the petition for en banc rehearing [58] received from Appellant Lakshmi Arunachalam. [677557] [JAB] [Entered: 03/10/2020 12:33 PM] (0) |
| Mar 9, 2020 | 58 | MODIFIED ENTRY: Petition for en banc rehearing filed by Appellant Lakshmi Arunachalam. Service: 03/05/2020 by US mail. [677556]--[Edited 03/10/2020 by JAB - compliance review complete] [JCP] [Entered: 03/10/2020 12:28 PM] (25) |
| Mar 6, 2020 | 57 | MODIFIED ENTRY: Duplicate of petition for en banc rehearing [58] received by email for Appellant Lakshmi Arunachalam. Service: 03/05/2020 by US mail. [676850]--[Edited 03/10/2020 by JAB to revise docket text] [JCP] [Entered: 03/06/2020 10:18 AM] (24) |
| Feb 26, 2020 | 56 | NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant Lakshmi Arunachalam, Petition for rehearing en banc [53], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 03/11/2020. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [674484] [JAB] [Entered: 02/26/2020 03:44 PM] (1) |
| Feb 24, 2020 | 55 | ORDER filed. The motions ([54], [671877-3], [671876-3]) are denied. By: Merits Panel (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [673605] [19-1223, 19-1251, 19-1794] [JAB] [Entered: 02/24/2020 12:06 PM] (3) |
| Feb 18, 2020 | 54 | MODIFIED ENTRY: MOTION of Appellant Lakshmi Arunachalam to vacate court's judgment [52]. [Consent: not addressed]. Service: 02/18/2020 by US mail. [671878]--[Edited 02/24/2020 by JAB to revise docket text] [JCP] [Entered: 02/18/2020 08:25 AM] (19) |
| Feb 14, 2020 | 53 | MODIFIED ENTRY: Petition for en banc rehearing filed by Appellant Lakshmi Arunachalam. Service: by. [671560]--[Edited 02/26/2020 by JAB to revise docket text] This document is non-compliant. See Doc. No. [56]. [JCP] [Entered: 02/14/2020 02:15 PM] (36) |
| Feb 13, 2020 | 52 | JUDGMENT. AFFIRMED. Terminated on the merits after submission on the briefs. COSTS: Costs taxed against Appellant(s). Mandate to issue in due course. For information regarding costs, petitions for rehearing, and petitions for writs of certiorari click here. [670983] [JAB] [Entered: 02/13/2020 09:55 AM] (1) |
| Feb 13, 2020 | 51 | OPINION filed for the court by Lourie, Circuit Judge; Moore, Circuit Judge and Chen, Circuit Judge. Appellant's motions ([35], [38], [40], [46], [650800-2], [663114-2]) are denied; Nonprecedential Per Curiam Opinion. [670982] [19-1223, 19-1794] [JAB] [Entered: 02/13/2020 09:54 AM] (7) |
| Feb 7, 2020 | 50 | Service copy of [49] Notice of and Verified Claim of Trespass and Injury received from Lakshmi Arunachalam. [669621]--[Edited 02/10/2020 by JAB to update docket text] [JCP] [Entered: 02/10/2020 09:02 AM] (7) |
| Feb 7, 2020 | 48 | Submitted ON THE BRIEFS. Panel: Judge: Lourie , Judge: Moore , Judge: Chen. [669334] [JCP] [Entered: 02/07/2020 12:00 PM] (0) |
| Feb 6, 2020 | 49 | MODIFIED ENTRY: Notice from Appellant Lakshmi Arunachalam of and Verified Claim of Trespass and Injury. Service: 02/06/2020 by US mail, email. [669351]--[Edited 02/07/2020 by JAB - compliance review complete] [JCP] [Entered: 02/07/2020 12:25 PM] (6) |
| Jan 31, 2020 | 47 | MODIFIED ENTRY: Second Notice from Appellant Lakshmi Arunachalam of constitutional challenges. Service: 01/31/2020 by US mail, email. [667805]--[Edited 02/03/2020 by JAB - compliance review complete] [JCP] [Entered: 02/03/2020 07:09 AM] (38) |
| Jan 15, 2020 | 46 | MOTION of Appellant Lakshmi Arunachalam for Summary Judgment of Undisputed Facts [Consent: not addressed]. Service: 01/14/2020 by US mail. [663104] [JAB] [Entered: 01/15/2020 09:41 AM] (15) |
| Dec 30, 2019 | 45 | Memorandum in lieu of oral argument for Appellant Lakshmi Arunachalam. Service: 12/27/2019 by US mail. [659348] [JAB] [Entered: 12/30/2019 12:12 PM] (13) |
| Dec 27, 2019 | 44 | ORDER filed denying [43] motion to allow argument filed by Lakshmi Arunachalam. By: Merits Panel (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [659001] [19-1223, 19-1251, 19-1794] [JAB] [Entered: 12/27/2019 09:13 AM] (3) |
| Dec 21, 2019 | 43 | MOTION of Appellant Lakshmi Arunachalam in 19-1794, 19-1223, 19-1251 to allow argument [Consent: opposed]. Service: 12/21/2019 by US mail. [658860] [19-1794, 19-1223, 19-1251] [JAB] [Entered: 12/26/2019 01:44 PM] (28) |
| Dec 17, 2019 | 42 | NOTICE OF SUBMISSION WITHOUT ARGUMENT. Panel: 2002O. Case scheduled February 7, 2020. Argument is not required and this case will be submitted to the panel on the date indicated. [657353] [MJL] [Entered: 12/17/2019 06:40 PM] (2) |
| Dec 9, 2019 | 41 | Note to file: 19-1223, 19-1251 and 19-1794 shall be considered companion cases and assigned to the same merits panel. [655097] [19-1223, 19-1251, 19-1794] [JAB] [Entered: 12/09/2019 04:06 PM] (0) |
| Nov 22, 2019 | 40 | MOTION for other relief of Appellant Lakshmi Arunachalam. [Consent: not addressed]. Service: 11/22/2019 by US mail. [651734] [JAB] [Entered: 11/22/2019 01:22 PM] (43) |
| Nov 21, 2019 | 39 | Notice from United States Intervention. Service: 11/21/2019 by email, US mail. [651491] [19-1223] [Melissa Patterson] [Entered: 11/21/2019 05:58 PM] (2) |
| Nov 20, 2019 | 38 | MOTION for enforcement of Appellant Lakshmi Arunachalam [Consent: not addressed]. Service: 11/20/2019 by US mail. [650808] [JAB] [Entered: 11/20/2019 11:03 AM] (5) |
| Nov 19, 2019 | 37 | ORDER deferring motion to disqualify [35] to merits panel assigned to hear this case; deferring motion to sanction [35] to merits panel assigned to hear this case. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [650562] [JAB] [Entered: 11/19/2019 01:43 PM] (2) |
| Nov 19, 2019 | 36 | ORDER filed. The motion to file an extended reply [35] is granted. The motions [28], [643874-2] to recuse judges and Presidio Bank’s request for sanctions are denied. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [650536] [19-1223, 19-1794] [JAB] [Entered: 11/19/2019 01:21 PM] (5) |
| Oct 29, 2019 | 35 | REPLY of Lakshmi Arunachalam to response [34] filed by Presidio Bank with incorporated MOTION to disqualify counsel and enlarge the word count for the reply [Consent: not addressed]. Service: 10/28/2019 by email, US mail. [645534] [MJL] [Entered: 10/29/2019 01:45 PM] (27) |
| Oct 25, 2019 | 32 | NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Presidio Bank, Response [31], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due 11/01/2019. The deadline for any responsive filing runs from service of the original version. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [644621] [MJL] [Entered: 10/25/2019 08:22 AM] (2) |
| Oct 25, 2019 | 34 | RESPONSE of Appellee Presidio Bank to the motion to recuse judge [28] filed by Appellant Lakshmi Arunachalam. Service: 10/25/2019 by email. [644962] [19-1223] [Andrew Isbester] [Entered: 10/25/2019 06:24 PM] (19) |
| Oct 24, 2019 | 31 | FILED from Appellee Presidio Bank. Title: RESPONSE. Service: 10/24/2019 by email. [644610] [19-1223]. This response is non-compliant. See Doc. No. [32]. [Andrew Isbester] [Entered: 10/24/2019 10:08 PM] (12) |
| Oct 23, 2019 | 33 | Notice from Lakshmi Arunachalam of misstatement in clerk's order. Service: 10/23/2019 by US mail. [644866] [MJL] [Entered: 10/25/2019 03:15 PM] (16) |
| Oct 22, 2019 | 30 | ORDER Notice of Dr. Arunachalam’s constitutional challenge [643875-2] [643872-2] [29] is hereby certified to the Attorney General. No later than 30 days from the date of filing of this order, the Attorney General is directed to inform this court whether the United States intends to intervene in these appeals. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [643956] [19-1223, 19-1251, 19-1794] [NL] [Entered: 10/22/2019 03:45 PM] (3) |
| Oct 21, 2019 | 29 | Notice from Lakshmi Arunachalam of constitutional challenges. Service: 10/21/2019 by US mail. [643867] [MJL] [Entered: 10/22/2019 01:41 PM] (21) |
| Oct 11, 2019 | 28 | MOTION of Lakshmi Arunachalam to recuse judges [Consent: not addressed]. Service: 10/11/2019 by US mail. [643863] [MJL] [Entered: 10/22/2019 01:39 PM] (7) |
| Jul 23, 2019 | 27 | Entry of appearance for A. James Isbester as of counsel for Appellee Presidio Bank. Service: 07/23/2019 by US mail, email. [622931] [19-1223] [Andrew Isbester] [Entered: 07/23/2019 03:09 PM] (2) |
| Jun 27, 2019 | 26 | ORDER filed. The motions [24] [611937-2] are denied. (Per Curiam). Service: 06/27/2019 by clerk. [617458] [19-1223, 19-1251] [LMS] [Entered: 06/27/2019 01:04 PM] (3) |
| Jun 6, 2019 | 24 | MOTION of Appellant Lakshmi Arunachalam for various reliefs [Consent: not addressed]. Service: 06/06/2019 by US mail. [611942] [SJ] [Entered: 06/06/2019 08:48 AM] (2) |
| May 24, 2019 | 23 | ORDER granting motion to correct [20], denying as moot motion to extend time to file appendix [20] filed by Appellant Lakshmi Arunachalam. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [609493] [SJ] [Entered: 05/24/2019 09:20 AM] (2) |
| May 23, 2019 | 22 | 6 paper copies of the Opening Response Brief [16] received from Appellee Presidio Bank. [609318] [CJF] [Entered: 05/23/2019 11:35 AM] (0) |
| May 23, 2019 | 21 | 6 paper copies of the Appendix Brief [18] received from Appellee Presidio Bank. [609316] [CJF] [Entered: 05/23/2019 11:34 AM] (0) |
| May 21, 2019 | 19 | Outstanding paper copies of all briefs and appendices must be submitted within five business days from the date of issuance of this notice. See Fed. Cir. R. 25(c)(1). [608818] [SJ] [Entered: 05/21/2019 04:22 PM] (0) |
| May 20, 2019 | 20 | MOTION of Appellant Lakshmi Arunachalam to correct the service date of the Reply Brief, to extend the time to 05/23/2019 to file the appendix [Consent: not addressed]. Service: 05/20/2019 by email, US mail. [608956] [SJ] [Entered: 05/22/2019 11:21 AM] (6) |
| May 20, 2019 | 18 | MODIFIED ENTRY: APPENDIX FILED for Presidio Bank. Number of Pages: 185. Service: 05/20/2019 by US mail, email. [608361] --[compliance review complete - Edited 05/21/2019 by SMJ] [Candice Decaire] [Entered: 05/20/2019 10:22 AM] (187) |
| May 13, 2019 | 25 | 6 paper copies of the Reply Brief [17] received from Appellant Lakshmi Arunachalam. [613092] [CJF] [Entered: 06/11/2019 12:43 PM] (0) |
| May 13, 2019 | 17 | REPLY BRIEF FILED for Appellant Lakshmi Arunachalam. Number of Pages: 27. Service: 05/11/2019 by US mail, email. Unless ordered otherwise, any responsive deadline runs from the date of service of this brief. See Fed. Cir. R. 31. [607374] [SJ] [Entered: 05/15/2019 08:59 AM] (38) |
| Apr 22, 2019 | 16 | MODIFIED ENTRY: BRIEF FILED for Appellee Presidio Bank. Number of Pages: 23. Service: 04/22/2019 by email, US mail. Unless ordered otherwise, any responsive deadline runs from the date of service of this brief. See Fed. Cir. R. 31. [602073] --[compliance review complete - Edited 04/29/2019 by SMJ] [Candice Decaire] [Entered: 04/22/2019 03:56 PM] (30) |
| Apr 12, 2019 | 14 | 5 paper copies of the Corrected Opening Brief [13] received from Appellant Lakshmi Arunachalam. [599636] [CJF] [Entered: 04/12/2019 11:38 AM] (0) |
| Apr 2, 2019 | 15 | 1 paper copies of the Corrected Opening Brief [13] received from Appellant Lakshmi Arunachalam. [599654] [CJF] [Entered: 04/12/2019 11:54 AM] (0) |
| Apr 2, 2019 | 13 | CORRECTED BRIEF FILED for Appellant Lakshmi Arunachalam. Number of Pages: 57. Service: 03/26/2019 by US mail. Unless ordered otherwise, any responsive deadline runs from the date of service of the original brief. See Fed. Cir. R. 31. [599166] [SJ] [Entered: 04/11/2019 08:52 AM] (102) |
| Mar 21, 2019 | 12 | NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant Lakshmi Arunachalam, Opening Appeal Brief [11], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 04/04/2019. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court.[594702] [SJ] [Entered: 03/21/2019 04:09 PM] (2) |
| Mar 14, 2019 | 11 | FILED from Appellant Lakshmi Arunachalam. Title: OPENING BRIEF. [594265] This brief is non-compliant. See Doc. No. [12] [SJ] [Entered: 03/20/2019 03:45 PM] (103) |
| Dec 27, 2018 | 10 | Filing fee paid in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on 12/27/2018. [575918] [SJ] [Entered: 01/04/2019 11:17 AM] (0) |
| Dec 19, 2018 | 9 | ORDER filed. The motions to extend time [4] [5] are granted to the extent that Dr. Arunachalam’s opening formal brief is due no later than March 15, 2019. The motion to waive the filing fee [5] is denied. Dr. Arunachalam is directed to pay the $505 filing fee within twenty one days from the date of filing of this order, or the appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Per Curiam). Service: 12/19/2018 by clerk. [573106] [NL] [Entered: 12/19/2018 01:45 PM] (2) |
| Dec 13, 2018 | 8 | Corrected Certificate of Interest for the Appellee Presidio Bank. Service: 12/13/2018 by US mail, email. [571687] [19-1223] [Candice Decaire] [Entered: 12/13/2018 05:22 PM] (3) |
| Dec 12, 2018 | 7 | NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellee Presidio Bank, Certificate of Interest [3], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 12/19/2018. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court.[571365] [MMA] [Entered: 12/12/2018 03:51 PM] (2) |
| Dec 12, 2018 | 6 | CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE: re:attorney entry of appearance Docket No. [2], ERROR: (1) Counsel's admission date to the Federal Circuit bar is not listed. (2) Counsel did notindicate if this is her first appearance before this Court. CORRECTION: In future filings, (1) list the admission date on all appearances filed and (2) indicate if it is your first appearance before this Court. THIS MESSAGE IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. [571360] [MMA] [Entered: 12/12/2018 03:47 PM] (0) |
| Dec 10, 2018 | 5 | MOTION of Appellant Lakshmi Arunachalam to extend the time to 03/11/2019 to file the formal opening brief., to waive fees [Consent: not addressed]. Service: 12/10/2018 by email. [570964] [SJ] [Entered: 12/11/2018 03:18 PM] (8) |
| Dec 10, 2018 | 3 | Certificate of Interest for the Appellee Presidio Bank. Service: 12/10/2018 by email, US mail. [570534] [19-1223]. This document is non-compliant. See Doc. No.[7] [Candice Decaire] [Entered: 12/10/2018 02:29 PM] (3) |
| Dec 10, 2018 | 2 | Entry of appearance for Candice C. Decaire as principal counsel for Appellee Presidio Bank. Service: 12/10/2018 by email, US mail. [570528] [19-1223] [Candice Decaire] [Entered: 12/10/2018 02:26 PM] (2) |
| Dec 4, 2018 | 4 | MOTION of Appellant Lakshmi Arunachalam to extend the time to 03/15/2019 to file the formal opening brief. [Consent: not addressed]. Service: 12/04/2018 by email. [570713] [SJ] [Entered: 12/11/2018 08:51 AM] (6) |
| Nov 26, 2018 | 1 | Appeal docketed. Received: 11/06/2018. [567320]Fee/IFP due on 12/10/2018. Entry of Appearance due 12/10/2018. Appellant/Petitioner's Informal brief is due 12/17/2018. [SJ] [Entered: 11/26/2018 09:40 AM] (103) |
