Case number 2:20-cv-07146
BE Labs, Inc. v. Netis Systems USA Corp. > Documents
| Date Field | Doc. No. | Description (Pages) |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2020 | 24 | AMENDED DOCUMENT filed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc.. Amendment to Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of an Action (Pursuant to FRCP 41a(1)), 21 , Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) - optional html form,, 22 (Glenn, Michael) (Entered: 12/09/2020) (2) |
| Dec 8, 2020 | 23 | RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS by Clerk RE: Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed 12/3/2020 21 . The document is stricken and counsel is ordered to file an amended or corrected document immediately. (gk) (Entered: 12/08/2020) (1) |
| Dec 7, 2020 | 22 | NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of an Action (Pursuant to FRCP 41a(1)) 21 . The following error(s) was/were found: The plaintiff in this matter is BE Labs, Inc. Page 2, lines 2-3, reads in part, "... Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies, Inc., hereby dismisses this action without prejudice..." In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) (Entered: 12/07/2020) (1) |
| Dec 3, 2020 | 21 | [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS ON 12/8/2020, SEE DOCKET NO. 23] NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc.. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Glenn, Michael) Modified on 12/8/2020 (gk). (Entered: 12/03/2020) (2) |
| Dec 1, 2020 | 20 | MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order To Show Cause Regarding Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before 12/9/2020 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. Defendant did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff(s) have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk) (Entered: 12/02/2020) (1) |
| Nov 17, 2020 | 19 | (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. On November 12, 2020, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why it should not dismiss this action for lack of prosecution. Plaintiff has filed a response to the Order to Show Cause re Lack of Prosecution on November 16, 2020. The Court deems that response satisfactory, and orders the Order to Show Cause discharged. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cb) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 11/17/2020) (0) |
| Nov 16, 2020 | 18 | PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc., upon Defendant Netis Systems USA Corp. served on 11/5/2020, answer due 11/27/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon John Chen, Person in charge, for Gang Dai, Registered Agent (authorized to receive service of process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. Proof of Service executed by K. Curiel (Glenn, Michael) (Entered: 11/16/2020) (2) |
| Nov 12, 2020 | 17 | MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order To Show Cause Regarding Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before 11/25/2020 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a Defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Plaintiff(s) have failed to file a proof of service within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint on the Defendants. Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by showing that service was effectuated within the 90 day deadline or by showing good cause for the failure to do so. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk) (Entered: 11/13/2020) (1) |
| Sep 29, 2020 | 16 | 21-Day Summons Issued re Complaint 1 as to Defendant Netis Systems USA Corp. (gk) (Entered: 09/29/2020) (2) |
| Sep 27, 2020 | 15 | Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 filed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc.. (Glenn, Michael) (Entered: 09/27/2020) (2) |
| Aug 21, 2020 | 13 | NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Isaac Rubicoff to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc. 12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(b) Proposed order not attached. Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(d) Attached Certificate of Good Standing not issued within 30 days prior to filing of the application. (lom) (Entered: 08/21/2020) (1) |
| Aug 21, 2020 | 14 | RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Isaac Rubicoff to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc. 12 by Clerk. The document is stricken. (lom) (Entered: 08/21/2020) (1) |
| Aug 20, 2020 | 11 | RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Isaac Rubicoff to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc. 9 by Clerk. The document is stricken. (lom) (Entered: 08/20/2020) (1) |
| Aug 20, 2020 | 12 | STRICKEN, see docket entry no. 14 - APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Isaac Rubicoff to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400.00 Previously Paid on 8/19/2020, Receipt No. 27697742) filed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing) (Glenn, Michael) Modified on 8/21/2020 (lom). (Entered: 08/20/2020) (0) |
| Aug 19, 2020 | 9 | STRICKEN, see docket entry no. 11 - APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Isaac Rubicoff to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-27697742) filed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc.. Application set for hearing on 9/9/2020 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (Glenn, Michael) Modified on 8/20/2020 (lom). (Entered: 08/19/2020) (3) |
| Aug 19, 2020 | 10 | NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Isaac Rubicoff to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-27697742) 9 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing date set, but no hearing required. Other error(s) with document(s): There is no Certificate of Good Standing from the state in which the attorney was barred, and no signature of local counsel. (sbou) (Entered: 08/19/2020) (1) |
| Aug 12, 2020 | 8 | STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb) (Entered: 08/12/2020) (14) |
| Aug 11, 2020 | 4 | NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (car) (Entered: 08/11/2020) (1) |
| Aug 11, 2020 | 5 | NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) (Entered: 08/11/2020) (2) |
| Aug 11, 2020 | 6 | NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Isaac P Rabicoff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car) (Entered: 08/11/2020) (1) |
| Aug 11, 2020 | 7 | NOTICE AND ORDER REGARDING TRANSFER AND/OR REASSIGNMENT OF PATENT CASE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Case transferred from Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim to Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver for all further proceedings. Case number now reads 2:20-cv-07146 AB (RAOx). (esa) (Entered: 08/11/2020) (1) |
| Aug 9, 2020 | 1 | COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27552505 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit '581 Patent, # 2 Exhibit '183 Patent, # 3 Exhibit Claim on '581 Patent, # 4 Exhibit Claim on '183 Patent) (Attorney Michael J Glenn added to party BE Labs, Inc.(pty:pla))(Glenn, Michael) (Entered: 08/09/2020) (0) |
| Aug 9, 2020 | 2 | CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc.. (Glenn, Michael) (Entered: 08/09/2020) (3) |
| Aug 9, 2020 | 3 | CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc., (Glenn, Michael) (Entered: 08/09/2020) (1) |
