Case number 2:19-cv-02639
BE Labs, Inc. v. Tenda Technology, Inc. > Documents
| Date Field | Doc. No. | Description (Pages) |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2019 | 32 | REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing). (Attachments: # 1 Order Re Stipulation to Dismiss Case) (jp) (Entered: 11/21/2019) (0) |
| Nov 20, 2019 | 31 | ORDER Re Stipulation to Dismiss Case With Prejudice (Dkt. 30 by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Court finds good cause to GRANT the Stipulation. The above-captioned case is dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its owncosts, expenses, and attorneys fees. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) (Entered: 11/21/2019) (1) |
| Nov 8, 2019 | 30 | Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) Stipulation filed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Corcoran, Peter) (Entered: 11/08/2019) (0) |
| Oct 7, 2019 | 29 | ORDER RE STIPULATION CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (DKT. 28 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The Scheduling Conference previously set for October 21, 2019, is continued to November 18, 2019 at 1:30 p.m. The parties shall submit the Joint Rule 16(b)/26(f) Report, or a request for the dismissal of the action pursuant to a settlement agreement, on or before November 8, 2019. (lom) (Entered: 10/07/2019) (2) |
| Oct 2, 2019 | 28 | STIPULATION to Continue Scheduling Conference from 10/21/2019 to 11/18/2019 filed by Defendant and Counter-Claimant Tenda Technology, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration R. Benson, # 2 Proposed Order)(Benson, Robert) (Entered: 10/02/2019) (0) |
| Aug 26, 2019 | 27 | ORDER RE STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (DKT. 26 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt, The Stipulation is APPROVED as follows: (1) The Scheduling Conference shall be continued until October 21, 2019 at 11:30 AM. (2) The parties shall submit the Rule 26(f) report no later than October 11, 2019. (jp) (Entered: 08/26/2019) (2) |
| Aug 21, 2019 | 26 | STIPULATION to Continue Scheduling Conference from September 16, 2019 to October 14, 2019 filed by Defendant/Counter-Claimant Tenda Technology, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Robert J. Benson, # 2 Proposed Order)(Benson, Robert) (Entered: 08/21/2019) (0) |
| Aug 7, 2019 | 25 | ANSWER to Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), Counterclaim 23 filed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc..(Corcoran, Peter) (Entered: 08/07/2019) (9) |
| Jul 23, 2019 | 24 | ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. This matter is set for a Scheduling Conference on 9/16/2019 at 01:30 PM. Report Due: 9/6/2019. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER SPECIFICS). (jp) (Entered: 07/23/2019) (14) |
| Jul 22, 2019 | 21 | ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Tenda Technology, Inc..(Benson, Robert) (Entered: 07/22/2019) (8) |
| Jul 22, 2019 | 22 | CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Tenda Technology, Inc. identifying Shenzhen Tenda Technology CO., LTD. as Corporate Parent. (Benson, Robert) (Entered: 07/22/2019) (2) |
| Jul 22, 2019 | 23 | ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 with JURY DEMAND, COUNTERCLAIM against BE Labs, Inc. filed by Counter-Claimant Tenda Technology, Inc..(Benson, Robert) (Entered: 07/22/2019) (8) |
| Jul 19, 2019 | 20 | ORDER TO STRIKE ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS by Judge John A. Kronstadt: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: Answer to Complaint and Counterclaim 19 , for the following reasons: All initiating documents are to be filed as a separate docket entry. Dkt. 10 at 21. Counsel shall refile the Answer and Counter-Claim as two separate documents no later than 7/22/2019. All parties to the Counter-Claim shall be added to the docket. (jp) (Entered: 07/19/2019) (1) |
| Jul 17, 2019 | 19 | [STRICKEN PER DKT. 20 ] ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 with JURY DEMAND, COUNTERCLAIM against BE Labs, Inc. filed by Defendant and Counter-Claimant Tenda Technology, Inc..(Benson, Robert). Modified on 7/19/2019 (jp). (Entered: 07/17/2019) (11) |
| Jun 12, 2019 | 18 | ORDER RE SECOND STIPULATION FOR 30-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND(DKT. 17) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The Court APPROVES the Second Stipulation. Defendant Tenda Technology, Inc. shall have until July 17, 2019 to respond to the initial Complaint. There will be no further continuances granted absent compelling circumstances that could have not been otherwise foreseen. (shb) (Entered: 06/12/2019) (1) |
| Jun 11, 2019 | 15 | Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Robert J Benson counsel for Defendant Tenda Technology, Inc.. Adding Robert Benson as counsel of record for Tenda Technology, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Tenda Technology, Inc.. (Attorney Robert J Benson added to party Tenda Technology, Inc.(pty:dft))(Benson, Robert) (Entered: 06/11/2019) (2) |
| Jun 11, 2019 | 16 | Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Johannes S Hsu counsel for Defendant Tenda Technology, Inc.. Adding Johannes Hsu as counsel of record for Tenda Technology, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Tenda Technology, Inc.. (Attorney Johannes S Hsu added to party Tenda Technology, Inc.(pty:dft))(Hsu, Johannes) (Entered: 06/11/2019) (2) |
| Jun 11, 2019 | 17 | Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Tenda Technology, Inc. answer now due 7/17/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 filed by Defendant Tenda Technology, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Benson, Robert) (Entered: 06/11/2019) (0) |
| Jun 3, 2019 | 14 | STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Tenda Technology, Inc. answer now due 6/17/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 filed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc..(Corcoran, Peter) (Entered: 06/03/2019) (2) |
| May 16, 2019 | 13 | NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Judge John A. Kronstadt, ORDERING Response for Tenda AC5 Patent Infringement submitted by Defendant Tenda Technology, Inc. received on 5/15/2019 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: Local Rule 11-3.8: Lacking name, address, phone, facsimile numbers, and e-mail address. The Clerk shall return the documents to the sender at the return address attached. All documents filed with this Court shall have a title, Caption page pursuant to L. R. 11-3.8. (shb) (Entered: 05/17/2019) (8) |
| Apr 26, 2019 | 12 | PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc., upon Defendant Tenda Technology, Inc. served on 4/25/2019, answer due 5/16/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Refused to give name or title in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Corcoran, Peter) (Entered: 04/26/2019) (2) |
| Apr 23, 2019 | 11 | ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO Local Rule 83-1.3.1 and General Order 19-03 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2;19-cv-02636 JAK(ASx). Case referred from Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar for Discovery. The case number will now read as follows: 2:19-cv-02639 JAK(ASx). Signed by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (rn) (Entered: 04/23/2019) (1) |
| Apr 10, 2019 | 10 | STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER SPECIFICS). (jp) (Entered: 04/10/2019) (30) |
| Apr 9, 2019 | 2 | CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc. (Corcoran, Peter) (Entered: 04/09/2019) (2) |
| Apr 9, 2019 | 9 | NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Isaac Rabicoff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (lh) (Entered: 04/09/2019) (1) |
| Apr 9, 2019 | 8 | NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments No. 5 Civil Cover Sheet should not have been attached to Docket Entry No.1. Each document should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (lh) (Entered: 04/09/2019) (1) |
| Apr 9, 2019 | 7 | 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 as to Defendant Tenda Technology, Inc. (lh) (Entered: 04/09/2019) (2) |
| Apr 9, 2019 | 6 | NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) (Entered: 04/09/2019) (2) |
| Apr 9, 2019 | 5 | NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (lh) (Entered: 04/09/2019) (1) |
| Apr 9, 2019 | 4 | Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 filed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc.. (Corcoran, Peter) (Entered: 04/09/2019) (2) |
| Apr 9, 2019 | 3 | REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by BE Labs, Inc.. (Corcoran, Peter) (Entered: 04/09/2019) (1) |
| Apr 6, 2019 | 1 | Complaint* (1) |
