Beckman Coulter, Inc. v. Sirigen II Limited et al. > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2022-01208
Filing Date Jun 29, 2022
Institution Decision Date Jan 6, 2023
Decision Date Jan 6, 2023
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status Institution Denied
Administrative JudgesJon B. Tornquist, Brian D. Range, Donna M. Praiss
Judge Writing the Final DecisionJon B. Tornquist
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 40, 41
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
8Beckman Coulter, Inc.
Attorney Name: David M. Krinsky
Williams & Connolly
Beckman Coulter, Inc.
Attorney Name: Anthony H. Sheh
Williams & Connolly
Beckman Coulter, Inc.
Attorney Name: Debmallo Shayon Ghosh
Williams & Connolly
Beckman Coulter, Inc.
Attorney Name: Arthur J. Argall III
Williams & Connolly
Beckman Coulter, Inc.
Attorney Name: Timothy M. Swager
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Beckman Coulter, Inc.
Attorney Name: Ingrid Hsieh-Yee
Catholic University of America
Beckman Coulter, Inc.
Attorney Name: Colin P. Nuckolls
Columbia University
Beckman Coulter, Inc.
Attorney Name: Juan Pablo Alperin
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
Patent Owner Attorneys
3SIRIGEN, INC.
Attorney Name: Thomas C. Grimm
Foley Hoag
SIRIGEN, INC.
Attorney Name: Brendan T. Jones
Foley Hoag
SIRIGEN, INC.
Attorney Name: Lucas P. Watkins
Foley Hoag
Related Patents
Doc No | Title | Issue date |
---|---|---|
08575303 | Reagents for directed biomarker signal amplification | Nov 5, 2013 |