Case number 2:21-cv-08972
CAO Lighting, Inc. v. Signify N.V. et al > Documents
| Date Field | Doc. No. | Description (Pages) |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2023 | 96 | REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: # 1 Order Granting Stipulation and Request for Order to Dismiss Action) (gk) (Entered: 09/25/2023) (0) |
| Sep 22, 2023 | 95 | ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court, having reviewed the parties' Stipulation and Request 94 , hereby orders that all of Plaintiff CAO Lighting, Inc.'s claims in the action are dismissed with prejudice. All of Defendant Signify North America Corporation's claims, defenses, and counterclaims in the action are dismissed without prejudice. The parties will each bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. All scheduled dates and deadlines are vacated. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk) (Entered: 09/25/2023) (2) |
| Sep 19, 2023 | 94 | STIPULATION to Dismiss Case filed by Plaintiff CAO Lighting, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Rahmanpour, Roya) (Entered: 09/19/2023) (0) |
| Jul 5, 2023 | 93 | MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER EXTENDING STAY PENDING RESOLUTION OF INTER PARTES REVIEW RE: SIGNIFY PETITIONS by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Status Report 92 and ORDERS that the stay shall be maintained pending the Signify IPR Petitions as well as the Cree Petition. The parties are ORDERED to file a Joint Status Report every 120 days from the issuance of this Order, with each report indicating the due date of the next report on the caption. Within 21 days of the conclusion of all of the IPR petitions, the parties must file a final Joint Status Report along with a Stipulation and Proposed Order proposing next steps and an appropriate schedule. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk) (Entered: 07/06/2023) (1) |
| Jun 26, 2023 | 92 | STATUS REPORT (Joint) filed by Defendant Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-B)(Brooks, Sarah) (Entered: 06/26/2023) (0) |
| Dec 21, 2022 | 91 | MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY PENDING RESOLUTION OF INTER PARTES REVIEW 83 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendants Motion to stay this litigation pending the Cree IPR. As to the Signify Petitions, the Court orders the parties to submit a Joint Status report within ten days of institution decisions in both of the Signify Petitions. If the PTAB institutes one or both of the Signify Petitions, the parties shall provide, in their Joint Report, their positions regarding whether this stay shall be extended pending a final written decision in any instituted Signify Petition. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm) (Entered: 12/21/2022) (7) |
| Dec 9, 2022 | 90 | REPLY In Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Inter Partes Review of the Patent-In-Suit 83 filed by Defendant Signify North America Corporation, Counter Claimant Signify North America Corporation. (Brooks, Sarah) (Entered: 12/09/2022) (19) |
| Dec 5, 2022 | 89 | ANSWER to Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), Counterclaim 80 with JURY DEMAND filed by Plaintiff CAO Lighting, Inc..(Rahmanpour, Roya) (Entered: 12/05/2022) (14) |
| Dec 2, 2022 | 88 | MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Inter Partes Review of the Patent-In-Suit 83 filed by Plaintiff CAO Lighting, Inc.. (Rahmanpour, Roya) (Entered: 12/02/2022) (17) |
| Dec 2, 2022 | 87 | FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $300.00 into the registry of the Court from Venable LLP. Re: Order on Motion to Stay Case, 86 . Receipt number LA247137. (Vannithone, Tom) (Entered: 12/02/2022) (0) |
| Nov 29, 2022 | 86 | ORDER DENYING EX PARTE APPLICATION AND SANCTIONING DEFENDANT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Defendant's Ex Parte Motion to Stay Litigation Pending Resolution of Its Motion to Stay Litigation Based on Inter Partes Review of the Patent-in-Suit 84 is DENIED. The Court SANCTIONS Defendant in the amount of $300, payable to the Clerk of Court, within seven days of this Order. See document for further details. (gk) (Entered: 11/29/2022) (3) |
| Nov 23, 2022 | 85 | OPPOSITION in opposition re: EX PARTE APPLICATION to Stay Case pending Resolution Of Its Motion to Stay Litigation Based on Inter Partes Review of The Patent-In-Suit 84 filed by Plaintiff CAO Lighting, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Jeffrey C. Morgan, # 2 Exhibit 1 - CAO RFP Set 1, # 3 Exhibit 2 - CAO Rogs Set 1, # 4 Exhibit 3 - Signify's Objections to CAO RFP Set 1, # 5 Exhibit 4 - 8/2/22 Dorsky Letter, # 6 Exhibit 5 - CAO's Infringement Contentions, # 7 Exhibit 6 - 10/4/22 Email Thread, # 8 Exhibit 7 - Signify's RFP Set 1, # 9 Exhibit 8 - 10/25 to 10/31 Email Thread, # 10 Exhibit 9 - 11/8/22 Dorsky Letter)(Morgan, Jeffrey) (Entered: 11/23/2022) (0) |
| Nov 22, 2022 | 84 | EX PARTE APPLICATION to Stay Case pending Resolution Of Its Motion to Stay Litigation Based on Inter Partes Review of The Patent-In-Suit filed by Defendant Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Brooks, Sarah) (Entered: 11/22/2022) (0) |
| Nov 22, 2022 | 83 | NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Inter Partes Review of the Patent-In-Suit filed by Defendant Signify North America Corporation. Motion set for hearing on 12/23/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Jason M. Dorsky, # 2 Exhibit A-E, # 3 Exhibit F-I, # 4 Exhibit J-L, # 5 Proposed Order) (Brooks, Sarah) (Entered: 11/22/2022) (0) |
| Oct 26, 2022 | 82 | ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER TO EXTEND CAO LIGHTING, INC.S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMS by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Court, having reviewed Plaintiff CAO Lighting, Inc. (CAO Lighting) and Defendant Signify North America Corporations (Signify NoAC) (collectively Parties) joint stipulation and request for order to extend CAO Lightings deadline to respond to Signify NoACs Counterclaims, and for good cause showing, approves the Parties stipulation. CAO Lighting shall file an answer or other respond to the Counterclaims no later than December 5, 2022. IT IS SO ORDERED. (rolm) (Entered: 10/27/2022) (1) |
| Oct 25, 2022 | 81 | Joint STIPULATION to Continue date to respond to counterclaim from November 7, 2022 to December 5, 2022 filed by plaintiff CAO Lighting, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Rahmanpour, Roya) (Entered: 10/25/2022) (0) |
| Oct 17, 2022 | 80 | ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition, 44 with JURY DEMAND , COUNTERCLAIM against CAO Lighting, Inc. filed by Defendant Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1-6)(Brooks, Sarah) (Entered: 10/17/2022) (0) |
| Sep 26, 2022 | 79 | ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Sean M. McCarthy to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Signify North America Corporation (f/k/a Philips Lighting North America Corporation), designating Sarah S. Brooks as local counsel 77 . (gk) (Entered: 09/27/2022) (1) |
| Sep 23, 2022 | 78 | ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT BY 14 DAYS by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court approves the parties' Stipulation 75 and ORDERS that Defendant Signify North America Corporation file its responsive pleading to the First Amended Complaint 44 no later than 10/17/2022. (gk) (Entered: 09/26/2022) (1) |
| Sep 22, 2022 | 77 | APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Sean M. McCarthy to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants Signify N.V., Signify North America Corporation (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34032237) filed by Defendants Signify N.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Brooks, Sarah) (Entered: 09/22/2022) (0) |
| Sep 22, 2022 | 76 | MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym: Order Denying Plaintiffs Motion to Compel 66 (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (kca) (Entered: 09/22/2022) (7) |
| Sep 21, 2022 | 75 | Joint STIPULATION for Order re Extension of Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint by 14 Days filed by Defendant Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Brooks, Sarah) (Entered: 09/21/2022) (0) |
| Sep 19, 2022 | 74 | ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT SIGNIFY N.V.'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION (Dkt. No. 48) by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. : For the foregoing reasons, the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over Defendant Signify N.V. with respect to Plaintiff's claims. Signify N.V. is therefore DISMISSED without prejudice. (see document for further details) (bm) (Entered: 09/19/2022) (12) |
| Sep 19, 2022 | 73 | MINUTES [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. denying 49 MOTION to Dismiss Case: For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's Motion is DENIED. (see document for further details) (bm) (Entered: 09/19/2022) (7) |
| Sep 8, 2022 | 72 | Text Only Entry: The court takes PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT TO PROVIDE ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES 66 UNDER SUBMISSION. The hearing set for September 13, 2022 is VACATED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kca) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 09/08/2022) (0) |
| Aug 30, 2022 | 70 | SUPPLEMENT to MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Signify North American Corporation MOTION to Produce Documents and Things 66 filed by Plaintiff CAO Lighting, Inc.. (Rahmanpour, Roya) (Entered: 08/30/2022) (7) |
| Aug 30, 2022 | 71 | ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER TO AMEND CERTAIN PATENT RELATED DEADLINES by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court approves the parties' Stipulation 68 and orders that the events below shall have deadlines as follows: N.D. Cal. PLR 3-1 & 3-2 Infringement Contentions 9/9/2022. N.D. Cal. PLR 3-3 & 3-4 Invalidity Contentions 12/16/2022. (gk) (Entered: 08/31/2022) (2) |
| Aug 29, 2022 | 69 | ORDER APPROVING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (kca) (Entered: 08/29/2022) (15) |
| Aug 29, 2022 | 68 | Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File N.D. Cal. PLR 3-1 & 3-2 Infringement Contentions and N.D. Cal. PLR 3-3 & 3-4 Invalidity Contentions filed by plaintiff CAO Lighting, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Rahmanpour, Roya) (Entered: 08/29/2022) (0) |
| Aug 25, 2022 | 67 | Joint STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Plaintiff CAO Lighting, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Rahmanpour, Roya) (Entered: 08/25/2022) (0) |
| Aug 22, 2022 | 66 | NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Signify North American Corporation , MOTION to Produce Documents and Things filed by plaintiff CAO Lighting, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 9/13/2022 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (Attachments: # 1 Joint Stipulation, # 2 Declaration of Roya Rahmanpour, # 3 Exhibit A - ECF 59 Case Schedule, # 4 Exhibit B - ECF 60 Additional Patent Specific Dates for Case Schedule, # 5 Exhibit C - ECF 44 CAO's FAC Against Signify and Exhibits, # 6 Exhibit D - CAO Lighting's Interrogatories Set 1 to Signify NoAC, # 7 Exhibit E - CAO Lighting's RFPs Set 1 to Signify Defendants, # 8 Exhibit F - Defendant Signify NoAC's Obj & Response to CAO's Rogs Set 1, # 9 Exhibit G - Defendant Signify NoAC's Obj & Resp to CAO's RFPs Set 1, # 10 Exhibit H - Defendant Signify NoAC's RFPs Set 1 to CAO, # 11 Exhibit I - Letter to Signify re Discovery Response Deficiencies, # 12 Exhibit J - Dorsky ltr to Rahmanpour, # 13 Exhibit K - Dorskly ltr to Morgan and Rahmanpour, # 14 Exhibit L - Morgan ltr to Dorsky re July 29, 2022 meet and confer, # 15 Declaration of Jason M. Dorsky in Support of Signify NoAC's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel, # 16 Exhibit M - ECF 54 Rule 26(f) Report, # 17 Exhibit N - Patent Local Rules 11-20, # 18 Exhibit O - Dorsky 6-7-22 Email and Attachment, # 19 Exhibit P - Rahmanpour 6-7-22 Email, # 20 Exhibit Q - ECF 56 Joint Stipulation re Patent Deadlines, # 21 Exhibit R - Morgan 8-9-22 Email, # 22 Exhibit S - Dorsky 8-16-22 Email, # 23 Exhibit T - Morgan 8-16-22 Email, # 24 Exhibit U - Feit Order re Motion to Compel, # 25 Proposed Order)(Rahmanpour, Roya) (Entered: 08/22/2022) (0) |
| Aug 9, 2022 | 65 | ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr: granting 64 Non-Resident Attorney Jeffrey C. Morgan APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of CAO Lighting, Inc, designating Roya Rahmanpour as local counsel. (lom) (Entered: 08/10/2022) (1) |
| Aug 4, 2022 | 64 | APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jeffrey C. Morgan to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff CAO Lighting, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33756331) filed by plaintiff CAO Lighting, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Rahmanpour, Roya) (Entered: 08/04/2022) (0) |
| Jul 7, 2022 | 63 | ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Adam M. Kaufmann to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff CAO Lighting, Inc., designating Roya Rahmanpour as local counsel 62 . (gk) (Entered: 07/08/2022) (1) |
| Jul 1, 2022 | 62 | APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Adam M. Kaufmann to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff CAO Lighting, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33569124) filed by plaintiff CAO Lighting, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Rahmanpour, Roya) (Entered: 07/01/2022) (0) |
| Jun 29, 2022 | 61 | (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING 1) DEFENDANT SIGNIFY N.V.'S RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION 48 ; and 2) DEFENDANT SIGNIFY NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION'S RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (IQBAL/TWOMBLY) 49 UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court has considered the matters raised with respect to the Motions and has concluded that pursuant to Local Rule 7.15, the matters can be decided without oral argument. The Court advises counsel that the Motions, noticed for hearing on July 1, 2022, have been taken under submission and off its motion calendar. No appearance by counsel is necessary. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cb) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 06/29/2022) (0) |
| Jun 16, 2022 | 60 | ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO ADD ADDITIONAL DATES TO THE SCHEDULE OF PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation 56 , the Court hereby adopts the Northern District of California's Patent Local Rules ("N.D. Cal. P.L.R.s") for this case, with certain modifications to deadlines to accommodate the nature and scope of this case. Claim Construction Hearing set on 7/28/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. See document for further details. (gk) (Entered: 06/16/2022) (2) |
| Jun 16, 2022 | 59 | ORDER RE: JURY/COURT TRIAL: I. SCHEDULE; II. TRIAL PREPARATION; III. CONDUCT OF ATTORNEYS AND PARTIES by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Jury Trial set for 8/27/2024 08:30 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Final Pretrial Conference and Hearing on Motions In Limine set for 8/9/2024 11:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Last Date to Hear Motion to Amend Pleadings/Add Parties 8/26/2022. Non-Expert Discovery cut-off 1/12/2024. Last Date to Hear Motions 5/17/2024. Deadline to Complete Settlement Conference 5/31/2024. Trial Filings (first round): Motions In Limine, Memoranda of Contentions of Fact and Law, Witness Lists, Joint Exhibit List, Joint Status Report Regarding Settlement due by 7/12/2024. Trial Filings (second round): Oppositions to Motions In Limine, Joint Proposed Final Pretrial Conference Order due by 7/26/2024. See document for further details. (gk) (Entered: 06/16/2022) (18) |
| Jun 16, 2022 | 58 | ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 5/31/2024. (cb) (Entered: 06/16/2022) (1) |
| Jun 16, 2022 | 57 | (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court has reviewed the Joint Rule 26(f) Report submitted by the parties, and determines that an in-person Scheduling Conference is unnecessary. Accordingly, the Court VACATES the June 17, 2022, Scheduling Conference. Order re Jury/Court Trial to issue. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cb) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 06/16/2022) (0) |
| Jun 14, 2022 | 56 | Joint STIPULATION for Order to Add Additional Dates to the Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates filed by plaintiff CAO Lighting, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Rahmanpour, Roya) (Entered: 06/14/2022) (0) |
| Jun 8, 2022 | 55 | (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING 1) DEFENDANT SIGNIFY N.V.'S RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION 48 ; 2) DEFENDANT SIGNIFY NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION'S RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (IQBAL/TWOMBLY) 49 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The hearing date regarding these motions is continued from June 10, 2022, to July 1, 2022, at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. SO ORDERED.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cb) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 06/08/2022) (0) |
| Jun 3, 2022 | 54 | JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Plaintiff CAO Lighting, Inc... (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Rahmanpour, Roya) (Entered: 06/03/2022) (0) |
| May 27, 2022 | 53 | REPLY In Support Of Renewed NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case (Iqbal/Twombly) 49 filed by Defendant Signify North America Corporation. (Brooks, Sarah) (Entered: 05/27/2022) (13) |
| May 27, 2022 | 52 | REPLY In Support Of Renewed NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 48 filed by Defendant Signify N.V.. (Brooks, Sarah) (Entered: 05/27/2022) (19) |
| May 20, 2022 | 51 | OPPOSITION to Renewed NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 48 filed by Plaintiff CAO Lighting, Inc.. (Rahmanpour, Roya) (Entered: 05/20/2022) (27) |
| May 20, 2022 | 50 | OPPOSITION to Renewed NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case (Iqbal/Twombly) 49 filed by Plaintiff CAO Lighting, Inc.. (Rahmanpour, Roya) (Entered: 05/20/2022) (16) |
| May 6, 2022 | 49 | Renewed NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case (Iqbal/Twombly) filed by Defendant Signify North America Corporation. Motion set for hearing on 6/10/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Brooks, Sarah) (Entered: 05/06/2022) (0) |
| May 6, 2022 | 48 | Renewed NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Defendant Signify N.V.. Motion set for hearing on 6/10/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Michiel H. Thierry with Exhibits A-C, # 2 Proposed Order) (Brooks, Sarah) (Entered: 05/06/2022) (0) |
| Apr 19, 2022 | 47 | ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 45 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Court hereby ORDERS that Defendants shall have until May 6, 2022 to respond to the First Amended Complaint. (lom) (Entered: 04/20/2022) (2) |
| Apr 19, 2022 | 46 | (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DEEMING 1) DEFENDANT SIGNIFY NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF;S COMPLAINT 41 ; and 2) DEFENDANT SIGNIFY N.V.'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION 42 AS MOOT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: In light of the First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 44), Defendants Motions to Dismiss are DENIED as MOOT, and the hearing scheduled for April 29, 2022, is hereby VACATED. SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cb) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 04/19/2022) (0) |
| Apr 14, 2022 | 45 | Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response to the First Amended Complaint filed by Defendants Signify N.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Brooks, Sarah) (Entered: 04/14/2022) (0) |
| Apr 8, 2022 | 44 | Amended Complaint* (1) |
| Nov 16, 2021 | 1 | Complaint* (1) |
