Date Field | Doc. No. | Description (Pages) |
---|
Apr 22, 2020 | 32 | REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: # 1 Order of Dismissal) (gk) (Entered: 04/22/2020) (0) |
Apr 22, 2020 | 31 | ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE (PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41) by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: On 3/31/2020, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution 28 . A written response to the Order to Show Cause was ordered to be filed no later than 4/20/2020. No response having been filed to the Court's Order to Show Cause, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the case is dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the orders of the Court, pursuant to Local Rule 41. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk) (Entered: 04/22/2020) (1) |
Apr 14, 2020 | 30 | NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION of Kenneth S. Chang to Withdraw as Attorney filed by Defendant AEE Technology Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 5/15/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Unopposed Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, # 2 Declaration of Kenneth Chang in Support of Unopposed Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, # 3 Proposed Order) (Chang, Kenneth) (Entered: 04/14/2020) (0) |
Apr 2, 2020 | 29 | ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#20-045) approved by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. IT IS ORDERED, with the concurrence of the Case Management and Assignment Committee, that the following cases be reassigned from the calendar of Judge S. James Otero to the Calendar of Judge Andre Birotte, Jr. for all futher proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-10668 AB(AFMx). (rn) (Entered: 04/02/2020) (1) |
Mar 31, 2020 | 27 | MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge S. James Otero: ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL 26 . (lc) (Entered: 03/31/2020) (1) |
Mar 31, 2020 | 28 | MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge S. James Otero:Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause in writing by not later then April 20, 2020 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The court will consider the filing of the following as an appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause, on or before the above date: Answer by the Defendant(s) or Plaintiff's request for entry of default. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action. (lc) (Entered: 03/31/2020) (1) |
Mar 19, 2020 | 26 | NOTICE Request for Approval of Withdrawal of Counsel filed by Defendant AEE Technology Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Chang, Kenneth) Modified on 3/31/2020 (lc). (Entered: 03/19/2020) (0) |
Feb 13, 2020 | 25 | ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT AEE TECHNOLOGY INC. TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 24 by Judge S. James Otero. AEE Technology Inc. shall respond, move, or otherwise plead in response to Plaintiff's Complaint no later than March 20, 2020. (lom) (Entered: 02/13/2020) (2) |
Feb 12, 2020 | 24 | Second STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to March 20, 2020 re Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) 18 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 filed by Plaintiff AEE Technology Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Kenneth S Chang added to party AEE Technology Inc.(pty:dft))(Chang, Kenneth) (Entered: 02/12/2020) (0) |
Feb 6, 2020 | 23 | ORDER by Judge S. James Otero: granting 22 Non-Resident Attorney Isaac P Rabicoff APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff, Cedar Lane Technologies, designating Grant M. McArthur as local counsel. (yl) (Entered: 02/07/2020) (1) |
Feb 4, 2020 | 22 | APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Isaac P. Rabicoff to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Previously Paid on 12/26/2019, Receipt No. 097325021720) filed by Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Proposed Order) (Anderson, Kirk) (Entered: 02/04/2020) (0) |
Jan 24, 2020 | 21 | RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS. The document is stricken. Counsel shall submit a completed application in compliance with the Local Rules. See Notice to Filer of Deficiences filed January 23, 2020 20 . (cch) (Entered: 01/24/2020) (1) |
Jan 23, 2020 | 20 | NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Isaac P. Rabicoff to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Previously Paid on 12/26/2019, Receipt No. 097325021720) 19 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(a) Application not complete: state and/or federal courts to which the applicant has been admitted are not listed. DJ & MJ initials missing from application and proposed order. (lt) (Entered: 01/23/2020) (1) |
Jan 22, 2020 | 19 | APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Isaac P. Rabicoff to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Previously Paid on 12/26/2019, Receipt No. 097325021720) filed by Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement, # 2 Proposed Order) (Anderson, Kirk) (Entered: 01/22/2020) (0) |
Jan 17, 2020 | 18 | First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to AEE Technology Inc. answer now due 2/17/2020, re Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), 17 filed by Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc..(Anderson, Kirk) (Entered: 01/17/2020) (4) |
Jan 17, 2020 | 17 | PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc., upon Defendant AEE Technology Inc. served on 12/27/2019, answer due 1/17/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Amy Barnes - Registered Agenet in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Anderson, Kirk) (Entered: 01/17/2020) (1) |
Jan 14, 2020 | 15 | INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge S. James Otero. (vcr) (Entered: 01/14/2020) (30) |
Jan 14, 2020 | 16 | RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Isaac Rabicoff to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-25021720) 10 by Judge S. James Otero. Failure to comply with Notice of Deficiency. The document is stricken withoutprejudice. (lc) (Entered: 01/14/2020) (1) |
Jan 13, 2020 | 14 | ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Stve Kim to Judge S. James Otero and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-10668 SJO(AFMx). (rn) (Entered: 01/13/2020) (1) |
Dec 30, 2019 | 13 | NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Supplement 11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(d) Attached Certificate of Good Standing not issued within 30 days prior to filing of the application. Failed to comply with Local Rule 11-3.8. This filing does not comply or cure the Deficiency previously issued. (lt) (Entered: 12/30/2019) (1) |
Dec 27, 2019 | 11 | SUPPLEMENT to APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Isaac Rabicoff to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-25021720) 10 filed by Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (Anderson, Kirk) (Entered: 12/27/2019) (1) |
Dec 26, 2019 | 10 | [STRICKEN PER 1/14/2020 COURT G112B RESPONSE ORDER DOCKET NO. 16]. APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Isaac Rabicoff to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-25021720) filed by plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (Anderson, Kirk) Modified on 1/14/2020 (lc). (Entered: 12/26/2019) (3) |
Dec 26, 2019 | 12 | NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Isaac Rabicoff to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-25021720) 10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(b) Proposed order not attached. Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(d) Certificate of Good Standing not attached for every state court listed to which the applicant has been admitted. Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(a) Application not complete: state and/or federal courts to which the applicant has been admitted are not listed. (lom) (Entered: 12/27/2019) (1) |
Dec 18, 2019 | 6 | NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (et) (Entered: 12/18/2019) (1) |
Dec 18, 2019 | 7 | NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) (Entered: 12/18/2019) (2) |
Dec 18, 2019 | 8 | 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 as to Defendant AEE Technology Inc. (et) (Entered: 12/18/2019) (2) |
Dec 18, 2019 | 9 | NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Isaac P Rabicoff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) (Entered: 12/18/2019) (1) |
Dec 17, 2019 | 2 | Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 filed by Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (Anderson, Kirk) (Entered: 12/17/2019) (2) |
Dec 17, 2019 | 5 | CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. (Anderson, Kirk) (Entered: 12/17/2019) (3) |
Dec 17, 2019 | 4 | REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (Anderson, Kirk) (Entered: 12/17/2019) (1) |
Dec 17, 2019 | 3 | CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (Anderson, Kirk) (Entered: 12/17/2019) (1) |
Dec 17, 2019 | 1 | Complaint* (1) |