Case number 1:22-cv-01627
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Opticon Inc. > Documents
| Date Field | Doc. No. | Description (Pages) |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2023 | 20 | SO ORDERED Granting 19 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (***Civil Case Terminated). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 11/15/2023. (nms) (Entered: 11/15/2023) (1) |
| Nov 15, 2023 | 21 | Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,473,527; 6,972,790; 8,537,242. (Attachments: # 1 Order)(nms) (Entered: 11/15/2023) (0) |
| Nov 14, 2023 | 19 | JOINT Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice, by Opticon Inc.. (Balick, Steven) Modified on 11/15/2023 (nms). (Entered: 11/14/2023) (1) |
| Oct 13, 2023 | 18 | ANSWER to 17 Answer to Complaint and Counterclaims, by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc..(deBruin, David) Modified on 10/16/2023 (nms). (Entered: 10/13/2023) (6) |
| Sep 22, 2023 | 17 | ANSWER to 1 Complaint, with Jury Demand and COUNTERCLAIMS against Cedar Lane Technologies Inc., by Opticon Inc..(Balick, Steven) Modified on 9/22/2023 (nms). (Entered: 09/22/2023) (8) |
| Sep 12, 2023 | 15 | STIPULATION and Proposed Order regarding withdrawal of motion and establishment of answer deadline, by Opticon Inc.. (Balick, Steven) Modified on 9/12/2023 (nms). (Entered: 09/12/2023) (2) |
| Sep 12, 2023 | 16 | SO ORDERED Granting 15 Stipulated Order withdrawing motion and extending answer due date (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Opticon Inc. answer due 9/25/2023). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 9/12/2023. (nms) (Entered: 09/12/2023) (2) |
| Aug 21, 2023 | 14 | STIPULATION and Proposed Order to Extend Time - filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (deBruin, David) Modified on 8/21/2023 (nms). (Entered: 08/21/2023) (3) |
| Aug 21, 2023 | N/A | SO ORDERED, re 14 STIPULATION and Proposed Order to Extend Time (*Reset Briefing Schedule: re 12 MOTION to Dismiss. Answering Brief due 9/14/2023). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/21/2023. (nms) (Entered: 08/21/2023) (0) |
| Aug 17, 2023 | 12 | MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and for Failure to State a Claim, and to Permit Limited Discovery Prior to Further Briefing - filed by Opticon Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Balick, Steven) Modified on 8/17/2023 (nms). (Entered: 08/17/2023) (0) |
| Aug 17, 2023 | 13 | OPENING BRIEF in Support re 12 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and for Failure to State a Claim, and to Permit Limited Discovery Prior to Further Briefing, filed by Opticon Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 8/31/2023. (Balick, Steven) Modified on 8/17/2023 (nms). (Entered: 08/17/2023) (17) |
| Jul 20, 2023 | N/A | SO ORDERED, re 11 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Opticon Inc. answer due 8/23/2023). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 7/20/2023. (nms) (Entered: 07/20/2023) (0) |
| Jul 19, 2023 | 11 | Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint - filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (deBruin, David) Modified on 7/20/2023 (nms). (Entered: 07/19/2023) (2) |
| Jun 16, 2023 | N/A | SO ORDERED, re 10 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Opticon Inc. answer due 7/24/2023). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 6/16/2023. (nms) (Entered: 06/16/2023) (0) |
| Jun 15, 2023 | 10 | Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint - filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (deBruin, David) Modified on 6/16/2023 (nms). (Entered: 06/15/2023) (2) |
| May 22, 2023 | 9 | Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint- filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (deBruin, David) Modified on 5/22/2023 (nms). (Entered: 05/22/2023) (3) |
| May 22, 2023 | N/A | SO ORDERED, re 9 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Opticon Inc. answer due 6/22/2023). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/22/2023. (nms) (Entered: 05/22/2023) (0) |
| May 17, 2023 | 8 | Letter to Judge Richard G. Andrews, from Paul J. Napoli, Esq., regarding dissociation of Napoli Shkolnik LLC from Plaintiff's counsel. (apk) (Entered: 05/18/2023) (1) |
| Mar 16, 2023 | 7 | Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint - filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (deBruin, David) Modified on 3/16/2023 (nms). (Entered: 03/16/2023) (3) |
| Mar 16, 2023 | N/A | SO ORDERED, re 7 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Opticon Inc. answer due 5/23/2023). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 3/16/2023. (nms) (Entered: 03/16/2023) (0) |
| Mar 3, 2023 | 6 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc..Opticon Inc. served on 3/3/2023, answer due 3/24/2023. (deBruin, David) (Entered: 03/03/2023) (2) |
| Dec 28, 2022 | N/A | Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-01626-UNA, 1:22-cv-01627-UNA, 1:22-cv-01628-UNA, 1:22-cv-01629-UNA(nms) (Entered: 12/28/2022) (0) |
| Dec 23, 2022 | 1 | COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement with Jury Demand against Opticon Inc. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-4031643) - filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Appearance of Counsel, # 8 Civil Cover Sheet)(mkr) Modified on 12/28/2022 (nms). (Entered: 12/27/2022) (0) |
| Dec 23, 2022 | 2 | Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mkr) (Entered: 12/27/2022) (3) |
| Dec 23, 2022 | 3 | Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,473,527; 6,972,790; 8,537,242. (mkr) (Entered: 12/27/2022) (1) |
| Dec 23, 2022 | 4 | Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. (mkr) (Entered: 12/27/2022) (2) |
| Dec 23, 2022 | 5 | Summons Issued as to Opticon Inc. on 12/23/2022. (mkr) (Entered: 12/27/2022) (2) |
