Case number 1:23-cv-00336
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Vantage Robotics, Inc. > Documents
| Date Field | Doc. No. | Description (Pages) |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2023 | N/A | SO ORDERED, re 13 Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Vantage Robotics, Inc. answer due 10/30/2023). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 9/21/2023. (nms) (Entered: 09/21/2023) (0) |
| Sep 20, 2023 | 13 | Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint - filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (deBruin, David) Modified on 9/21/2023 (nms). (Entered: 09/20/2023) (2) |
| Jul 31, 2023 | N/A | SO ORDERED, re 12 Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Vantage Robotics, Inc. answer due 9/29/2023). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 7/31/2023. (lah) Modified on 7/31/2023 (nms). (Entered: 07/31/2023) (0) |
| Jul 28, 2023 | 12 | Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint - filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (deBruin, David) Modified on 7/30/2023 (nms). (Entered: 07/28/2023) (2) |
| Jun 26, 2023 | N/A | SO ORDERED, re 11 Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Vantage Robotics, Inc. answer due 8/4/2023). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 6/26/2023. (nms) (Entered: 06/26/2023) (0) |
| Jun 23, 2023 | 11 | Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint - filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (deBruin, David) Modified on 6/26/2023 (nms). (Entered: 06/23/2023) (2) |
| May 30, 2023 | 10 | Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint - filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (deBruin, David) Modified on 5/30/2023 (nms). (Entered: 05/30/2023) (2) |
| May 30, 2023 | N/A | SO ORDERED, re 10 Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Vantage Robotics, Inc. answer due 7/5/2023). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/30/2023. (nms) (Entered: 05/30/2023) (0) |
| May 17, 2023 | 9 | Letter to Judge Richard G. Andrews, from Paul J. Napoli, Esq., regarding dissociation of Napoli Shkolnik LLC from Plaintiff's counsel. (apk) (Entered: 05/18/2023) (1) |
| Apr 19, 2023 | 8 | Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint - filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (deBruin, David) Modified on 4/19/2023 (nms). (Entered: 04/19/2023) (2) |
| Apr 19, 2023 | N/A | SO ORDERED, re 8 Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Vantage Robotics, Inc. answer due 6/5/2023). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 4/19/2023. (nms) (Entered: 04/19/2023) (0) |
| Apr 10, 2023 | 6 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc..Vantage Robotics, Inc. served on 3/29/2023, answer due 4/19/2023. (deBruin, David) (Entered: 04/10/2023) (2) |
| Apr 10, 2023 | 7 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (deBruin, David) (Entered: 04/10/2023) (2) |
| Mar 29, 2023 | N/A | Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:23-cv-00336-UNA, 1:23-cv-00337-UNA(nms) (Entered: 03/29/2023) (0) |
| Mar 26, 2023 | 1 | Complaint* (1) |
| Mar 26, 2023 | 2 | Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (twk) (Entered: 03/27/2023) (3) |
| Mar 26, 2023 | 3 | Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,972,790; 8,537,242. (twk) (Entered: 03/27/2023) (1) |
| Mar 26, 2023 | 4 | Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. (twk) (Entered: 03/27/2023) (2) |
| Mar 26, 2023 | 5 | Summons Issued as to Vantage Robotics, Inc. on 3/27/2023. (twk) (Entered: 03/27/2023) (2) |
