Case number 8:21-cv-00046
Core Optical Technologies, LLC v. Comcast Corporation et al > Documents
| Date Field | Doc. No. | Description (Pages) |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2021 | 90 | (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING ALCATEL SUBMARINE NETWORKS SAS MOTION TO DISMISS OFF CALENDAR by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Based on the Order re Stipulation for Stay of Proceedings Against Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS dated October 8, 2021, the Motion currently set for November 8, 2021 is off calendar. No appearance by counsel is necessary. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tj) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 10/28/2021) (0) |
| Oct 8, 2021 | 89 | ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS AGAINST ALCATEL SUBMARINE NETWORKS SAS (DKT. 87 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The Stipulation is APPROVED. [See Order for details.] (et) (Entered: 10/08/2021) (2) |
| Oct 8, 2021 | 88 | NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS, identifying Alcatel Lucent SAS. (Davison, Thomas) (Entered: 10/08/2021) (4) |
| Oct 7, 2021 | 87 | STIPULATION to Stay Case pending the stay entered in Core Optical Techs. LLC v. Nokia Corp. et al., Case No. 8:19-cv-02190 JAK (RAOx), Docket No. 114 filed by defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Davison, Thomas) (Entered: 10/07/2021) (0) |
| Oct 4, 2021 | 86 | REPLY in support of motion NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case 81 filed by Defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS. (Davison, Thomas) (Entered: 10/04/2021) (21) |
| Sep 13, 2021 | 85 | MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case 81 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Stephen Underwood, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit 10, # 12 Exhibit 11, # 13 Exhibit 12, # 14 Exhibit 13)(Underwood, Stephen) (Entered: 09/13/2021) (0) |
| Aug 18, 2021 | 84 | Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Hidetada James Abe counsel for Defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS. Max Edward Rubinson is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS. (Abe, Hidetada) (Entered: 08/18/2021) (2) |
| Aug 10, 2021 | 83 | ORDER RE STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING SCHEDULE (DKT. 82 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Stipulation is APPROVED. Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC shall serve and file any opposition to Defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SASs ("ASN") Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 81 ) on or before 9/13/2021. ASN shall serve and file any reply on or before 10/4/2021. (jp) (Entered: 08/10/2021) (2) |
| Aug 9, 2021 | 82 | STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response and Reply filed by Defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Davison, Thomas) (Entered: 08/09/2021) (0) |
| Jul 27, 2021 | 81 | NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS. Motion set for hearing on 11/8/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum, # 2 Proposed Order, # 3 Exhibit 1, # 4 Exhibit 2, # 5 Exhibit 3, # 6 Exhibit 4, # 7 Exhibit 5, # 8 Exhibit 6, # 9 Exhibit 7, # 10 Exhibit 8) (Davison, Thomas) (Entered: 07/27/2021) (0) |
| Jul 8, 2021 | 80 | ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION ON THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT AND EXTENSION OF TIME (DKT. 78 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Stipulation is APPROVED. Plaintiff Core Optical shall file and serve its Third Amended Complaint on or before 7/7/2021. The Third Amended Complaint (Dkt. 79 ) was already filed and is accepted. Defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS shall file and serve its response to Plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint on or before 7/28/2021. (jp) (Entered: 07/08/2021) (2) |
| Jul 6, 2021 | 79 | Amended Complaint* (1) |
| Jul 6, 2021 | 79 | Third AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Comcast Corporation, Centurytel Service Group, LLC, Qwest Corporation, BTE Equipment, LLC, Google, LLC, Zayo Group, LLC, Apple, Inc., Cox Communications, Inc., Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS, Does amending Amended Complaint/Petition, 76 , filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Redline Document, # 2 Exhibit 01, # 3 Exhibit 02, # 4 Exhibit 03, # 5 Exhibit 04, # 6 Exhibit 05, # 7 Exhibit 06, # 8 Exhibit 07, # 9 Exhibit 08, # 10 Exhibit 09, # 11 Exhibit 10, # 12 Exhibit 11, # 13 Exhibit 12, # 14 Exhibit 13, # 15 Exhibit 14, # 16 Exhibit 15, # 17 Exhibit 16, # 18 Exhibit 17, # 19 Exhibit 18, # 20 Exhibit 19, # 21 Exhibit 20, # 22 Exhibit 21, # 23 Exhibit 22, # 24 Exhibit 23, # 25 Exhibit 24, # 26 Exhibit 25, # 27 Exhibit 26, # 28 Exhibit 27, # 29 Exhibit 28, # 30 Exhibit 29, # 31 Exhibit 30, # 32 Exhibit 31, # 33 Exhibit 32, # 34 Exhibit 33, # 35 Exhibit 34, # 36 Exhibit 35, # 37 Exhibit 36, # 38 Exhibit 37, # 39 Exhibit 38, # 40 Exhibit 39, # 41 Exhibit 40, # 42 Exhibit 41, # 43 Exhibit 42, # 44 Exhibit 43, # 45 Exhibit 44, # 46 Exhibit 45, # 47 Exhibit 46, # 48 Exhibit 47, # 49 Exhibit 48, # 50 Exhibit 49, # 51 Exhibit 50, # 52 Exhibit 51, # 53 Exhibit 52, # 54 Exhibit 53, # 55 Exhibit 54, # 56 Exhibit 55)(Hadley, Lawrence). Modified on 7/7/2021 (jp). (Entered: 07/06/2021) (0) |
| Jun 30, 2021 | 78 | Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS answer now due 7/28/2021, re Order, 77 , Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less), 75 filed by Defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Davison, Thomas) (Entered: 06/30/2021) (0) |
| Jun 28, 2021 | 77 | ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION ON SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND EXTENSION OF TIME (DKT. 75 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Stipulation is APPROVED. The deadline for Plaintiff Core Optical to file and serve its Second Amended Complaint is extended to 6/30/2021. Defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS shall file and serve its response to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement on or before 7/21/2021. (jp) (Entered: 06/29/2021) (2) |
| Jun 25, 2021 | 76 | Amended Complaint* (1) |
| Jun 25, 2021 | 76 | SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Amended Complaint/Petition, 22 , filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9)(Underwood, Stephen) (Entered: 06/25/2021) (0) |
| Jun 22, 2021 | 75 | Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to re Amended Complaint/Petition, 22 , Order Extending Answer Due Deadline, 63 filed by Defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Davison, Thomas) (Entered: 06/22/2021) (0) |
| Jun 9, 2021 | 74 | ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt granting 72 Non-Resident Attorney John D Haynes APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS, designating H James Abe as local counsel. (jp) (Entered: 06/09/2021) (2) |
| Jun 9, 2021 | 73 | ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt granting 71 Non-Resident Attorney Lindsay C Church APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS, designating H James Abe as local counsel. (jp) (Entered: 06/09/2021) (2) |
| Jun 8, 2021 | 72 | APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney John D. Haynes to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31430157) filed by Defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Georgia Certificate of Good Standing, # 2 Proposed Order) (Abe, Hidetada) (Entered: 06/08/2021) (0) |
| Jun 8, 2021 | 71 | APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Lindsay C. Church to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31429168) filed by Defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Georgia Certificate of Good Standing, # 2 Proposed Order) (Abe, Hidetada) (Entered: 06/08/2021) (0) |
| Jun 4, 2021 | 70 | ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt granting 62 Non-Resident Attorney Thomas W Davison APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS, designating James H Abe as local counsel. (jp) (Entered: 06/04/2021) (2) |
| Jun 4, 2021 | 69 | ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt granting 64 , 68 Non-Resident Attorney Max E Rubinson APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS, designating James H Abe as local counsel. (jp) (Entered: 06/04/2021) (2) |
| Jun 4, 2021 | 68 | APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Max E. Rubinson to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Previously Paid on 6/3/2021, Receipt No. ACACDC-31402276) filed by Defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit Georgia Certificate of Good Standing) (Abe, Hidetada) (Entered: 06/04/2021) (0) |
| Jun 4, 2021 | 67 | NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Exhibit (non-trial), 65 . The following error(s) was/were found: Caption of document is incomplete/incorrect. Case number is incorrect or missing. Title page is missing. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lt) (Entered: 06/04/2021) (1) |
| Jun 4, 2021 | 66 | NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Max E. Rubinson to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31402276) 64 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(d) Certificate of Good Standing not attached for every state court listed to which the applicant has been admitted. Certificates of Good Standing have been required since 9/08. See LR 83-2.1.3.3. See Instructions for Applicants (1) (G-64). (lt) (Entered: 06/04/2021) (1) |
| Jun 3, 2021 | 65 | EXHIBIT Filed filed by Defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS. Certificate of Good Standing as to APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Max E. Rubinson to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31402276) 64 . (Abe, Hidetada) (Entered: 06/03/2021) (1) |
| Jun 3, 2021 | 64 | APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Max E. Rubinson to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31402276) filed by Defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Abe, Hidetada) (Entered: 06/03/2021) (0) |
| Jun 3, 2021 | 63 | ORDER RE STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 61 by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Stipulation is APPROVED. Defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS shall file and serve its response to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement on or before 6/22/2021. (jp) (Entered: 06/03/2021) (2) |
| Jun 1, 2021 | 62 | APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Thomas W. Davison to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31387440) filed by Defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit DC Certificate of Good Standing, # 2 Exhibit FL Certificate of Good Standing, # 3 Exhibit VA Certificate of Good Standing, # 4 Proposed Order) (Abe, Hidetada) (Entered: 06/01/2021) (0) |
| May 28, 2021 | 61 | STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS answer now due 6/22/2021, re Amended Complaint/Petition, 22 filed by Defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Hidetada James Abe added to party Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS(pty:dft))(Abe, Hidetada) (Entered: 05/28/2021) (0) |
| Apr 22, 2021 | 60 | RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLCto Text Only Scheduling Notice,,,,, 56 Response to Order to Show Cause (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Stephen Underwood)(Underwood, Stephen) (Entered: 04/22/2021) (0) |
| Apr 21, 2021 | 59 | ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS AGAINST CERTAIN DEFENDANTS (DKT. 58 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. It is hereby ordered that: 1. All proceedings between Core and the Defendants, except proceedings pursuant to Rule 45 in the Nokia case, are hereby STAYED; 2. The Stipulating Parties shall meet and confer, and jointly report to the Court regarding continuation of the stay and the requested duration of the stay, on or before the earlier of: (i) April 30, 2022; (ii) within ten days of the conclusion of the Nokia case prior to trial; or (iii) two weeks before the final pre-trial conference in the Nokia case; and 3. This stay shall remain in effect until dissolved by order of the Court. (lom) (Entered: 04/21/2021) (3) |
| Apr 19, 2021 | 58 | STIPULATION to Stay Case pending, at Least, Completion of Discovery, Claim Construction, and Dispositive Motions in Underlying Nokia Case filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Stay)(Underwood, Stephen) (Entered: 04/19/2021) (0) |
| Apr 15, 2021 | 57 | ORDER RE STIPULATION TO AMEND COMPLAINT TO REPLACE CENTURYLINK PARTIES (DKT. 55 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Stipulation is APPROVED. PlaintiffCore Optical Technologies, LLC shall file its proposed Second Amended complaint, which replaces CenturyLink, Inc., with CenturyTel Service Group, LLC, Qwest Corporation dba CenturyLink QC, and BTE Equipment, LLC, and which does not otherwise change the allegations in Core's complaint, on the docket, and shall effect service of same in accordance with the Federal and Local Rules. (jp) (Entered: 04/16/2021) (2) |
| Apr 13, 2021 | 56 | (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION RE DEFENDANT as to Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than April 27, 2021, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. In the absence of showing good cause, an action shall be dismissed if the summons and complaint have not been served within 90 days after the filing of the complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). In light of the filing date of January 11, 2021, proof(s) of service were due by April 11, 2021. An action may also be dismissed prior to such time if the Plaintiff fails diligently to prosecute the action. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of an appropriate response. No oral argument will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Plaintiff is advised that the Court will consider the filing of a responsive pleading to the complaint and/or proof(s) of service, which indicates proper service in full compliance with the federal rules, on or before the date upon which the response is due, as a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tj) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 04/13/2021) (0) |
| Apr 1, 2021 | 55 | STIPULATION to AMEND Amended Complaint/Petition, 22 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Second Amended Complaint, # 2 Appendix Redline - Changes to Complaint, # 3 Exhibit 1 to Second Amended Complaint, # 4 Exhibit 2 to Second Amended Complaint, # 5 Exhibit 3 to Second Amended Complaint, # 6 Exhibit 4 to Second Amended Complaint, # 7 Exhibit 5 to Second Amended Complaint, # 8 Exhibit 6 to Second Amended Complaint, # 9 Exhibit 7 to Second Amended Complaint, # 10 Exhibit 8 to Second Amended Complaint, # 11 Exhibit 9 to Second Amended Complaint)(Underwood, Stephen) (Entered: 04/01/2021) (0) |
| Mar 30, 2021 | 54 | ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt granting 52 Non-Resident Attorney Michael J Turton APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Cox Communications, Inc., designating Mansi H Shah as local counsel. (jp) (Entered: 03/30/2021) (1) |
| Mar 29, 2021 | 53 | ORDER RE STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DKT. 46 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Stipulation is APPROVED. Defendant Apple Inc. shall respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint on or before 4/24/2021. (jp) (Entered: 03/29/2021) (2) |
| Mar 26, 2021 | 52 | APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Michael J. Turton to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Cox Communications, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-30992973) filed by Defendant Cox Communications, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Shah, Mansi) (Entered: 03/26/2021) (0) |
| Mar 18, 2021 | 43 | Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Kenneth Frederick Baum counsel for Defendant Apple, Inc.. Adding Kenneth Baum as counsel of record for Apple Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Apple Inc.. (Attorney Kenneth Frederick Baum added to party Apple, Inc.(pty:dft))(Baum, Kenneth) (Entered: 03/18/2021) (2) |
| Mar 18, 2021 | 44 | Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Michael T Pieja counsel for Defendant Apple, Inc.. Adding Michael T. Pieja as counsel of record for Apple Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Apple Inc.. (Attorney Michael T Pieja added to party Apple, Inc.(pty:dft))(Pieja, Michael) (Entered: 03/18/2021) (2) |
| Mar 18, 2021 | 45 | Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Douglas Jordan Winnard counsel for Defendant Apple, Inc.. Adding Doug Winnard as counsel of record for Apple Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Apple Inc.. (Attorney Douglas Jordan Winnard added to party Apple, Inc.(pty:dft))(Winnard, Douglas) (Entered: 03/18/2021) (2) |
| Mar 18, 2021 | 46 | STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to April 24, 2021 re Amended Complaint/Petition, 22 filed by Defendant Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant Apple Inc. to Respond to First Amended Complaint)(Pieja, Michael) (Entered: 03/18/2021) (0) |
| Mar 18, 2021 | 47 | ORDER granting Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer (More than 30 days) 42 , Defendant CenturyLink, Inc. answer due 4/19/2021 by Judge John A. Kronstadt (shb) (Entered: 03/18/2021) (2) |
| Mar 18, 2021 | 48 | ORDER RE STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DKT. 41), by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Stipulation is APPROVED. Defendant Comcast Corporation shall respond to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint on or before April 19, 2021. (shb) (Entered: 03/18/2021) (2) |
| Mar 18, 2021 | 49 | ORDER RE STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DKT. 39], by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Stipulation is APPROVED. Defendant Cox Communications, Inc. shall respond to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint on or before April 19, 2021. (shb) (Entered: 03/18/2021) (2) |
| Mar 18, 2021 | 50 | ORDER RE STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DKT., 38 , by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The Stipulation is APPROVED. Defendant Google LLC shall respond to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint on or before April 19, 2021. IT IS SO ORDERED. (shb) (Entered: 03/18/2021) (2) |
| Mar 18, 2021 | 51 | ORDER RE STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DKT. 40 , by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Stipulation is APPROVED. Defendant Zayo Group, LLC shall respond to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint on or before April 19, 2021. IT IS SO ORDERED. (shb) (Entered: 03/18/2021) (2) |
| Mar 17, 2021 | 42 | STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 4/19/2021 re Amended Complaint/Petition, 22 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Hadley, Lawrence) (Entered: 03/17/2021) (0) |
| Mar 17, 2021 | 41 | STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 4/19/2021 re Amended Complaint/Petition, 22 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Hadley, Lawrence) (Entered: 03/17/2021) (0) |
| Mar 17, 2021 | 40 | STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 4/19/2021 re Amended Complaint/Petition, 22 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Hadley, Lawrence) (Entered: 03/17/2021) (0) |
| Mar 12, 2021 | 39 | STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Cox Communications, Inc. answer now due 4/19/2021, re Amended Complaint/Petition, 22 filed by Defendant Cox Communications, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Shah, Mansi) (Entered: 03/12/2021) (0) |
| Mar 10, 2021 | 38 | STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to April 18, 2021 re Amended Complaint/Petition, 22 filed by Defendant Google, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint)(Almeling, David) (Entered: 03/10/2021) (0) |
| Mar 5, 2021 | 37 | Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Amy K Liang counsel for Defendant Google, LLC. Adding Amy K. Liang as counsel of record for Google, LLC for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Google, LLC. (Attorney Amy K Liang added to party Google, LLC(pty:dft))(Liang, Amy) (Entered: 03/05/2021) (2) |
| Mar 5, 2021 | 36 | Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney David S Almeling counsel for Defendant Google, LLC. Adding David S. Almeling as counsel of record for Google, LLC for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Google, LLC. (Attorney David S Almeling added to party Google, LLC(pty:dft))(Almeling, David) (Entered: 03/05/2021) (2) |
| Feb 12, 2021 | 35 | STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Comcast Corporation answer now due 3/18/2021, re Amended Complaint/Petition, 22 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC.(Hadley, Lawrence) (Entered: 02/12/2021) (3) |
| Feb 12, 2021 | 34 | STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to CenturyLink, Inc. answer now due 3/18/2021, re Amended Complaint/Petition, 22 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC.(Hadley, Lawrence) (Entered: 02/12/2021) (2) |
| Feb 12, 2021 | 33 | STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Apple, Inc. answer now due 3/18/2021, re Amended Complaint/Petition, 22 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC.(Hadley, Lawrence) (Entered: 02/12/2021) (2) |
| Feb 12, 2021 | 32 | STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Zayo Group, LLC answer now due 3/18/2021, re Amended Complaint/Petition, 22 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC.(Hadley, Lawrence) (Entered: 02/12/2021) (2) |
| Feb 12, 2021 | 31 | STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Google, LLC answer now due 3/18/2021, re Amended Complaint/Petition, 22 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC.(Hadley, Lawrence) (Entered: 02/12/2021) (2) |
| Feb 8, 2021 | 30 | PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC, upon Defendant Apple, Inc. served on 2/1/2021, answer due 2/22/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant in compliance with statute not specified by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Hadley, Lawrence) (Entered: 02/08/2021) (1) |
| Feb 5, 2021 | 29 | Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Cox Communications, Inc. answer now due 3/18/2021, re Amended Complaint/Petition, 22 filed by Defendant Cox Communications, Inc..(Attorney Mansi H Shah added to party Cox Communications, Inc.(pty:dft))(Shah, Mansi) (Entered: 02/05/2021) (3) |
| Jan 29, 2021 | 28 | PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC, served on 01/26/21. (Hadley, Lawrence) (Entered: 01/29/2021) (1) |
| Jan 28, 2021 | 27 | PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC, served on Jan 26, 2021. (Hadley, Lawrence) (Entered: 01/28/2021) (1) |
| Jan 28, 2021 | 26 | PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC, served on Jan 26, 2021. (Hadley, Lawrence) (Entered: 01/28/2021) (1) |
| Jan 28, 2021 | 25 | PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC, served on Jan 26, 2021. (Hadley, Lawrence) (Entered: 01/28/2021) (1) |
| Jan 27, 2021 | 24 | 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint 22 as to Defendant Apple, Inc. (jp) (Entered: 01/27/2021) (3) |
| Jan 25, 2021 | 23 | Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition, 22 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Underwood, Stephen) (Entered: 01/25/2021) (3) |
| Jan 25, 2021 | 22 | FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 , filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Appendix A - Redline)(Underwood, Stephen) (Entered: 01/25/2021) (0) |
| Jan 25, 2021 | 22 | Amended Complaint* (1) |
| Jan 22, 2021 | 21 | STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (tj) (Entered: 01/22/2021) (30) |
| Jan 19, 2021 | 20 | ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 8:19-cv-02189 JAK (RAOx). Case transferred from Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge John D. Early to Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:21-cv-00046 JAK (RAOx). Signed by Judge John A. Kronstadt (aco) (Entered: 01/19/2021) (1) |
| Jan 12, 2021 | 19 | 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 as to Defendant Zayo Group, LLC. (car) (Entered: 01/12/2021) (3) |
| Jan 12, 2021 | 18 | 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 as to Defendant Google, LLC. (car) (Entered: 01/12/2021) (3) |
| Jan 12, 2021 | 17 | 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 as to Defendant Cox Communications, Inc. (car) (Entered: 01/12/2021) (3) |
| Jan 12, 2021 | 16 | 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 as to Defendant Comcast Corporation. (car) (Entered: 01/12/2021) (3) |
| Jan 12, 2021 | 15 | 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 as to Defendant CenturyLink, Inc. (car) (Entered: 01/12/2021) (3) |
| Jan 12, 2021 | 14 | 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 as to Defendant Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS. (car) (Entered: 01/12/2021) (3) |
| Jan 12, 2021 | 13 | NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) (Entered: 01/12/2021) (2) |
| Jan 12, 2021 | 12 | NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (car) (Entered: 01/12/2021) (1) |
| Jan 11, 2021 | 11 | Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Hadley, Lawrence) (Entered: 01/11/2021) (3) |
| Jan 11, 2021 | 10 | Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Hadley, Lawrence) (Entered: 01/11/2021) (3) |
| Jan 11, 2021 | 9 | Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Hadley, Lawrence) (Entered: 01/11/2021) (3) |
| Jan 11, 2021 | 8 | Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Hadley, Lawrence) (Entered: 01/11/2021) (3) |
| Jan 11, 2021 | 7 | Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Hadley, Lawrence) (Entered: 01/11/2021) (3) |
| Jan 11, 2021 | 6 | Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Hadley, Lawrence) (Entered: 01/11/2021) (3) |
| Jan 11, 2021 | 5 | NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. Related Case(s): 8:19-cv-02190-JAK-RAO; 8:19-cv-2189-JAK-RAO; 20-cv-1463-JAK-RAO; 20-cv-1468-JAK-RAO (Hadley, Lawrence) (Entered: 01/11/2021) (7) |
| Jan 11, 2021 | 4 | NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC, (Hadley, Lawrence) (Entered: 01/11/2021) (1) |
| Jan 11, 2021 | 1 | Complaint* (1) |
| Jan 11, 2021 | 3 | REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Hadley, Lawrence) (Entered: 01/11/2021) (1) |
| Jan 11, 2021 | 2 | CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Hadley, Lawrence) (Entered: 01/11/2021) (3) |
