Case number 8:16-cv-00437
Core Optical Technologies, LLC v. Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc. > Documents
| Date Field | Doc. No. | Description (Pages) |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2017 | 114 | Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC.(LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 11/17/2017) (0) |
| Oct 17, 2017 | 113 | ORDER EXTENDING THE STAY OF DEADLINES PENDING THE FILING OF A JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. The October 16, 2017 Joint Status Report and Stipulation to Extend the Stay of Deadlines Pending the Filing of a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal having been considered by the Court, and good cause having been shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. That the stay of the above-captioned action set forth in the Court's prior Orders (Dkts. 99, 101, 103, 107, 109 & 111) is extended by an additional 45 days, until November 30, 2017; and 2. That the parties shall submit a joint status report on November 30, 2017 if they do not file a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal before then. (dro) (Entered: 10/17/2017) (0) |
| Oct 16, 2017 | 112 | Joint STATUS REPORT of the Parties and Stipulation to Extend the Stay of Deadlines Pending the Filing of a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 10/16/2017) (0) |
| Sep 25, 2017 | 111 | ORDER by Judge Andrew J. Guilford; EXTENDING the Stay of Deadlines Pending Finalization of Settlement Agreement. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: That the stay of the above-captioned action set forth in the Court's prior Orders (Dkts. 99, 101, 103, 107 & 109) is extended by an additional 14 business days, until October 16, 2017; and That the parties shall submit a joint status report on October 16, 2017 regarding execution of the Settlement Agreement and timing for filinga Joint Stipulation of Dismissal consistent with the terms of theSettlement Agreement. (mba) (Entered: 09/25/2017) (0) |
| Sep 22, 2017 | 110 | Joint STATUS REPORT of the Parties and Stipulation to Extend the Stay of Deadlines Pending Finalization of Settlement Agreement filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 09/22/2017) (0) |
| Sep 12, 2017 | 109 | ORDER EXTENDING THE STAY OF DEADLINES PENDING FINALIZATION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 108 by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. That the stay of the above-captioned action set forth in the Court's prior Orders (Dkts. 99, 101, 103 & 107) is extended by an additional two weeks, until September 25, 2017; and 2. That the parties shall submit a joint status report on September 25, 2017 regarding execution of the Settlement Agreement and timing for filing a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal consistent with the terms of the Settlement Agreement. NO FURTHER CONTINUANCES WILL BE GRANTED WITHOUT A FURTHER VERY STRONG SHOWING OF FURTHER GOOD CAUSE. (es) (Entered: 09/12/2017) (0) |
| Sep 11, 2017 | 108 | Joint STATUS REPORT of the Parties and Stipulation to Extend the Stay of Deadlines Pending Finalization of Settlement Agreement filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 09/11/2017) (0) |
| Sep 1, 2017 | 107 | ORDER by Judge Andrew J. Guilford; EXTENDING the Stay of Deadlines Pending Finalization of Settlement Agreement. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. That the stay of the above-captioned action set forth in the Court's prior Orders (Dkts. 99, 101 & 103) is extended by an additional seven (7) business days, until September 11, 2017; and 2. That the parties shall submit a joint status report on September 11, 2017 to inform the Court of the status of settlement if the parties do not file a joint stipulation of dismissal before then. (mba) (Entered: 09/01/2017) (0) |
| Aug 30, 2017 | 105 | Joint STATUS REPORT of the Parties and Stipulation to Extend the Stay of Deadlines Pending Finalization of Settlement Agreement filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 08/30/2017) (0) |
| Aug 30, 2017 | 106 | Proposed Order lodged with the Joint STATUS REPORT of the Parties and Stipulation to Extend the Stay of Deadlines Pending Finalization of Settlement Agreement (Dkt. 105) filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 08/30/2017) (0) |
| Aug 3, 2017 | 104 | Effective August 7, 2017, Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth will be located at the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building, COURTROOM 690 on the 6th Floor, located at 255 East Temple Street, Los Angeles, California 90012. All court appearances shall be made in Courtroom 690 of the Roybal Federal Building, and all mandatory chambers copies shall be hand delivered to the judge's mailbox located outside the Clerk's Office on the 12th Floor of the Roybal Federal Building. The location for filing civil documents in paper format exempted from electronic filing and for viewing case files and other records services remains at the United States Courthouse, 312 North Spring Street, Room G-8, Los Angeles, California 90012. The location for filing criminal documents in paper format exempted from electronic filing remains at the Roybal Federal Building, 255 East Temple Street, Room 178, Los Angeles, California 90012. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rrp) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 08/03/2017) (0) |
| Aug 2, 2017 | 103 | ORDER by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT EXTENDING the Stay of Deadlines Pending Finalization of Settlement Agreement. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. That the stay of the above-captioned action set forth in the Court's May 31, 2017 and July 10, 2017 Orders (Dkts. 99 & 101) is extended by an additional thirty (30) days, until August 30, 2017. 2. The parties shall submit a joint status report on August 30, 2017 to inform the Court of the status of settlement if the parties do not file a joint stipulation of dismissal before then. (mba) (Entered: 08/02/2017) (0) |
| Jul 31, 2017 | 102 | Joint STATUS REPORT of of the Parties and Stipulation to Extend the Stay of Deadlines Pending Finalization of Settlement Agreement filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 07/31/2017) (0) |
| Jul 10, 2017 | 101 | ORDER EXTENDING THE STAY OF DEADLINES PENDING FINALIZATION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. The stay of this Action set forth in the Court's May 31, 2017 Order (Dkt. 99) is extended by an additional thirty (30) days, until July 31, 2017. The parties shall submit a joint status report on July 31, 2017 to inform the Court of the status of settlement if the parties do not file a joint stipulation of dismissal before then. (dv) (Entered: 07/10/2017) (0) |
| Jun 30, 2017 | 100 | Joint STATUS REPORT of the Parties and Stipulation to Extend the Stay of Deadlines Pending Finalization of Settlement Agreement filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 06/30/2017) (0) |
| May 31, 2017 | 99 | ORDER VACATING HEARING DATES AND STAYING DEADLINES PENDING FINALIZATION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 98 by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT. (es) (Entered: 05/31/2017) (0) |
| May 30, 2017 | 97 | ORDER CONTINUING THE REPLY BRIEF AND HEARING DATES ASSOCIATED WITH CORE OPTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC'S MOTION TO COMPEL IDENTIFICATION AND PRODUCTION OF TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION SUFFICIENT TO SHOW THE OPERATION OF EACH ACCUSED INSTRUMENTALITY AS REQUIRED UNDER S.P.R. 2.6.1 by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, re Stipulation to Continue, 96 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. That the time for Core Optical Technologies, LLC to file its Reply in support of the above-reference motion is extended by seven (7) days, from 4:30 p.m. on May 26, 2017 to 4:30 p.m. on June 2, 2017; and 2. That the hearing on Core Optical Technologies, LLC's above-referenced motion is continued by seven (7) days, from 10:00 a.m. on June 1, 2017 to 10:00 a.m. on June 8, 2017. (bem) (Entered: 05/30/2017) (0) |
| May 30, 2017 | 98 | Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending to Stay Deadlines Pending Finalization of Settlement Agreement filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Barquist, Charles) (Entered: 05/30/2017) (0) |
| May 26, 2017 | 96 | Joint STIPULATION to Continue the Reply Brief and Hearing Dates Associated with Core Optical Technologies, LLC's Motion to Compel Identification and Production of Technical Documentation Sufficient to Show the Operation of Each Accused Instrumentality as Required Under S.P.R. 2.6.1 from May 26, 2017 (Reply) and June 1, 2017 (Hearing) to June 2, 2017 (Reply) and June 8, 2017 (Hearing) filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 05/26/2017) (0) |
| May 19, 2017 | 93 | APPLICATION to file document Opposition to Motion to Compel and Supporting Declarations under seal filed by Counter Claimant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc., Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Compel, # 3 Declaration of Keith D. Willis, # 4 Declaration of Charles S. Barquist)(Barquist, Charles) (Entered: 05/19/2017) (0) |
| May 19, 2017 | 94 | SEALED DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION to file document Opposition to Motion to Compel and Supporting Declarations under seal 93 filed by Counter Claimant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc., Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Compel, # 2 Declaration of Keith D. Willis, # 3 Declaration of Charles S. Barquist)(Barquist, Charles) (Entered: 05/19/2017) (0) |
| May 19, 2017 | 95 | PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc., re Sealed Declaration in SupportDeclaration, 94 served on May 19, 2017. (Malloy, Ryan) (Entered: 05/19/2017) (0) |
| May 12, 2017 | 92 | NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Identification and Production of Technical Documentation Sufficient to Show the Operation of Each Accused Instrumentality as Required Under S.P.R. 2.6.1 (Re-Noticed Pursuant to Court Order Dated May 10, 2017, Dkt. 91) filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. Motion set for hearing on 6/1/2017 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 05/12/2017) (0) |
| May 10, 2017 | 91 | MINUTES OF Telephone Conference re Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Orderfor the Deposition of Mark T. Core and Plaintiff's Motion for an Order requiring Defendant to Identify and Produce Technical Documentation held before Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth: Case is called. Counsel make their appearances. Court addresses parties regarding Plaintiff's Motions. Plaintiff's and Defendant's counsel are to meet and confer as soon as possible and settle on a date for Dr. Core's deposition to take place no later than May 31, 2017, in Orange County. Plaintiff's motion for a protective order is DENIED AS MOOT, and the hearing noticed for June 8, 2017, is ORDERED OFF CALENDAR. If the parties are unable to agree on a date in May for the deposition, Defendant's counsel may contact the Court's clerk to schedule a telephonic hearing concerning the matter. Plaintiff's motion for an order requiring Defendant to identify and produce technical documentation is to be renoticed by Plaintiff before Judge Rosenbluth for June 1, 2017, at 10 a.m. Defendant's opposition must be filed no later than May 19, 2017, at 4:30 p.m. Plaintiff's reply must be filed no later than May 26, 2017, at 4:30 p.m. (See Order for details) 81 Court Recorder: CS 5/10/2017. (bem) (Entered: 05/10/2017) (0) |
| May 9, 2017 | 87 | REPLY in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike the Untimely Disclosed Claim Terms, Claim Construction Theories, and Proffered Support (Including Expert Declaration of Dr. Prucnal) Cited in Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.'s Claim Construction Brief 65 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 05/09/2017) (0) |
| May 9, 2017 | 88 | DECLARATION of Lawrence R. LaPorte, Yasser M. El-Gamal, and Ehab M. Samuel (Joint Reply Declaration) in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike the Untimely Disclosed Claim Terms, Claim Construction Theories, and Proffered Support (Including Expert Declaration of Dr. Prucnal) Cited in Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.'s Claim Construction Brief 65 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 05/09/2017) (0) |
| May 9, 2017 | 89 | DECLARATION of Lawrence R. LaPorte (Reply Declaration) in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike the Untimely Disclosed Claim Terms, Claim Construction Theories, and Proffered Support (Including Expert Declaration of Dr. Prucnal) Cited in Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.'s Claim Construction Brief 65 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 05/09/2017) (0) |
| May 9, 2017 | 90 | DECLARATION of Charles A. Kertell (Reply Declaration) in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike the Untimely Disclosed Claim Terms, Claim Construction Theories, and Proffered Support (Including Expert Declaration of Dr. Prucnal) Cited in Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.'s Claim Construction Brief 65 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Kertell, Charles) (Entered: 05/09/2017) (0) |
| May 8, 2017 | 84 | NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Order for Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc. to Identify and Produce Technical Documentation Sufficient to Show the Operation of Each Accused Instrumentality as Required Under Standing Patent Rule 2.6.1 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. Motion set for hearing on 6/5/2017 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andrew J. Guilford. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 05/08/2017) (0) |
| May 8, 2017 | 85 | MEMORANDUM in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Order for Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc. to Identify and Produce Technical Documentation Sufficient to Show the Operation of Each Accused Instrumentality as Required Under Standing Patent Rule 2.6.1 < 84 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 05/08/2017) (0) |
| May 8, 2017 | 86 | DECLARATION of Lawrence R. LaPorte in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Order for Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc. to Identify and Produce Technical Documentation Sufficient to Show the Operation of Each Accused Instrumentality as Required Under Standing Patent Rule 2.6.1 < 84 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 05/08/2017) (0) |
| May 7, 2017 | 81 | NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Protective Order for the Deposition of Mark T. Core filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. Motion set for hearing on 6/8/2017 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 05/07/2017) (0) |
| May 7, 2017 | 82 | MEMORANDUM in Support of MOTION for Protective Order for the Deposition of Mark T. Core 81 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 05/07/2017) (0) |
| May 7, 2017 | 83 | DECLARATION of Lawrence R. LaPorte in Support of MOTION for Protective Order for the Deposition of Mark T. Core 81 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 05/07/2017) (0) |
| May 2, 2017 | 79 | NOTICE of Lodging of Proposed Construction Chart filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 05/02/2017) (0) |
| May 2, 2017 | 80 | MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike the Untimely Disclosed Claim Terms, Claim Construction Theories, and Proffered Support (Including Expert Declaration of Dr. Prucnal) Cited in Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.'s Claim Construction Brief 65 filed by Counter Claimant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc., Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Charles S. Barquist, # 2 Declaration of Ryan Malloy, # 3 Exhibit 1 to Declaration of Ryan Malloy, # 4 Exhibit 2 to Declaration of Ryan Malloy, # 5 Exhibit 3 to Declaration of Ryan Malloy, # 6 Exhibit 4 to Declaration of Ryan Malloy, # 7 Exhibit 5 to Declaration of Ryan Malloy, # 8 Exhibit 6 to Declaration of Ryan Malloy, # 9 Exhibit 7 to Declaration of Ryan Malloy)(Barquist, Charles) (Entered: 05/02/2017) (0) |
| May 1, 2017 | 69 | NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc., Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc. of Technology Tutorial. (Barquist, Charles) (Entered: 05/01/2017) (0) |
| May 1, 2017 | 70 | NOTICE filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. of Lodging of Parties' Joint Technical Tutorial (LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 05/01/2017) (0) |
| May 1, 2017 | 71 | NOTICE filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. of Lodging of Certified File History for Asserted Patent and CD of Certified File History (LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 05/01/2017) (0) |
| May 1, 2017 | 72 | Amended NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc., Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc. of Fujitsu Network Communication's Technology Tutorial. (Barquist, Charles) (Entered: 05/01/2017) (0) |
| May 1, 2017 | 73 | PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc., FNC's Technology Tutorial served on May 1, 2017. (Malloy, Ryan) (Entered: 05/01/2017) (0) |
| May 1, 2017 | 74 | BRIEF filed by Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.. Responsive Claim Construction Brief regarding Brief (non-motion non-appeal) 63 . (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Jennifer Zheng, # 2 Exhibit 1 to Declaration of Jennifer Zheng)(Barquist, Charles) (Entered: 05/01/2017) (0) |
| May 1, 2017 | 75 | Claim Construction Hearing Slides re: Brief (non-motion non-appeal), 62 (Barquist, Charles) (Entered: 05/01/2017) (0) |
| May 1, 2017 | 76 | BRIEF filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Core Optical Technologies, LLC's Responsive Brief to Defendant's Opening Claim Construction Brief) (LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 05/01/2017) (0) |
| May 1, 2017 | 77 | DECLARATION of Ehab M. Samuel re Brief (non-motion non-appeal) 76 (Core Optical Technologies, LLC's Responsive Brief to Defendant's Opening Claim Construction Brief) filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 05/01/2017) (0) |
| May 1, 2017 | 78 | Core Optical Technologies, LLC's Markman (Claim Construction) Presentation Slides filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC (LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 05/01/2017) (0) |
| Apr 28, 2017 | 68 | ORDER Continuing Hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Strike and Markman Hearing by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. The Court, having considered the Stipulation 67 Requesting Continuation of the Hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Strike From May 22, 2017 to June 5, 2017, and the Markman Hearing from June 6, 2017 to June 27, 2017, and finding good cause therefor, hereby ORDERS that: 1. The hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Strike, currently scheduled for May 22, 2017, is set for June 5, 2017 at 10:00 a.m.; and 2. The Markman hearing, currently set for June 6, 2017, is set for June 27, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. 3. The due date for Defendant's opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Strike is May 2, 2017. 4. The due date for Plaintiff's reply in support of its Motion to Strike is May 9, 2017. (dro) (Entered: 04/28/2017) (0) |
| Apr 27, 2017 | 67 | STIPULATION to Continue Plaintiff's Motion to Strike and Markman Hearing from May 22, 2017 and June 6, 2017 to June 5, 2017 and June 27, 2017 filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Malloy, Ryan) (Entered: 04/27/2017) (0) |
| Apr 21, 2017 | 65 | NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike the Untimely Disclosed Claim Terms, Claim Construction Theories, and Proffered Support (Including Expert Declaration of Dr. Prucnal) Cited in Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.'s Claim Construction Brief filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. Motion set for hearing on 5/22/2017 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andrew J. Guilford. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit 1 (to the Proposed Order)) (LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 04/21/2017) (0) |
| Apr 21, 2017 | 66 | MEMORANDUM in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike the Untimely Disclosed Claim Terms, Claim Construction Theories, and Proffered Support (Including Expert Declaration of Dr. Prucnal) Cited in Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.'s Claim Construction Brief 65 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 04/21/2017) (0) |
| Apr 17, 2017 | 61 | Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Ehab M Samuel counsel for Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. Adding Ehab Samuel as counsel of record for Core Optical Technologies, LLC for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attorney Ehab M Samuel added to party Core Optical Technologies, LLC(pty:pla))(Samuel, Ehab) (Entered: 04/17/2017) (0) |
| Apr 17, 2017 | 62 | BRIEF filed by Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.. Opening Claim Construction Brief (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Paul Prucnal, # 2 Declaration of Ryan Malloy, # 3 Exhibit 1 to Declaration of Ryan Malloy, # 4 Exhibit 2 to Declaration of Ryan Malloy, # 5 Exhibit 3 to Declaration of Ryan Malloy, # 6 Exhibit 4 to Declaration of Ryan Malloy, # 7 Exhibit 5 to Declaration of Ryan Malloy, # 8 Exhibit 6 to Declaration of Ryan Malloy)(Barquist, Charles) (Entered: 04/17/2017) (0) |
| Apr 17, 2017 | 63 | BRIEF filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Core Optical Technologies, LLC's Opening Claim Construction Brief) (LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 04/17/2017) (0) |
| Apr 17, 2017 | 64 | DECLARATION of Lawrence R. LaPorte re Brief (non-motion non-appeal) 63 (Core Optical Technologies, LLC's Opening Claim Construction Brief) filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30)(LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 04/17/2017) (0) |
| Apr 14, 2017 | 59 | OBJECTIONS to: (1) Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.'s "Amended Preliminary Claim Constructions;" (2) the Declaration of Paul R. Prucnal, Ph.D. Regarding Claim Construction; and (3) Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.'s Portion of the S.P.R. 3.4 Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement (Dkt. 58) filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 04/14/2017) (0) |
| Apr 14, 2017 | 60 | DECLARATION of Lawrence R. LaPorte re Objection, 59 (In Support of Core Optical Technologies, LLC's Objections to: (1) Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.'s "Amended Preliminary Claim Constructions;" (2) the Declaration of Paul R. Prucnal, Ph.D. Regarding Claim Construction; and (3) Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.'s Portion of the S.P.R. 3.4 Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement (Dkt. 58)) filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9)(LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 04/14/2017) (0) |
| Apr 10, 2017 | 58 | STATEMENT (Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement Per S.P.R. 3.4) filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 04/10/2017) (0) |
| Mar 22, 2017 | 55 | ORDER by Judge Andrew J. Guilford, re Notice (Other) 53 , Attorney Abirami Gnanadesigan and Craig Nevin Hentschel terminated. (lwag) (Entered: 03/22/2017) (0) |
| Mar 22, 2017 | 56 | ORDER to Continue Markman Hearing 54 by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: The Court, having considered the Stipulation Requesting Continuation of the Markman Hearing from May 23, 2017 to June 6, 2017 or the Next Available Date, and finding good cause therefor, hereby ORDERS that: The Markman hearing, currently scheduled for May 23, 2017, is set for June 6, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. (lwag) (Entered: 03/22/2017) (0) |
| Mar 18, 2017 | 54 | Joint STIPULATION to Continue the Markman Hearing from May 23, 2017 to June 6, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 03/18/2017) (0) |
| Mar 16, 2017 | 53 | NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL filed by defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Hentschel, Craig) (Entered: 03/16/2017) (0) |
| Mar 13, 2017 | 52 | MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER Lifting Stay and Setting Scheduling Order by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Report Concerning the Detail of Defendant's Petition for Inter Partes Review. (Dkt. 48 .) The stay in this litigation is lifted. The Court amends the case schedule as follows. (see document for details). (Case reopened. MD JS-5.) (dro) (Entered: 03/14/2017) (0) |
| Mar 13, 2017 | 57 | MINUTES OF STATUS CONFERENCE RE STAY Hearing held before Judge Andrew J. Guilford: Matter argued and taken under submission. Court Reporter: Miriam Baird. (lb) (Entered: 03/24/2017) (0) |
| Feb 21, 2017 | 49 | NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Charles S Barquist on behalf of Counter Claimant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc., Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc. (Attorney Charles S Barquist added to party Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.(pty:cc), Attorney Charles S Barquist added to party Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.(pty:dft))(Barquist, Charles) (Entered: 02/21/2017) (0) |
| Feb 21, 2017 | 50 | NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Ryan James Malloy on behalf of Counter Claimant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc., Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc. (Attorney Ryan James Malloy added to party Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.(pty:cc), Attorney Ryan James Malloy added to party Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.(pty:dft))(Malloy, Ryan) (Entered: 02/21/2017) (0) |
| Feb 21, 2017 | 51 | NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Jennifer Zheng on behalf of Counter Claimant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc., Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc. (Attorney Jennifer Zheng added to party Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.(pty:cc), Attorney Jennifer Zheng added to party Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.(pty:dft))(Zheng, Jennifer) (Entered: 02/21/2017) (0) |
| Feb 7, 2017 | 48 | JOINT REPORT of THE PARTIES CONCERNING THE DENIAL OF DEFENDANT'S PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW; PROPOSED SCHEDULE [PURSUANT TO COURT'S SEPTEMBER 12, 2016 ORDER] filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 02/07/2017) (0) |
| Sep 12, 2016 | 46 | MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Andrew J. Guilford granting 40 MOTION to Stay Case. The Court GRANTS Fujitsu's motion to stay pending inter partes review. The parties shall file a joint report within seven days of the issuance of the PTAB's decision. If inter partes review is denied, the parties shall include in the resulting report their respective or collective positions as to what dates should be adopted as to the pre-trial and trial matters addressed in the Order that followed the June 27, 2016 Scheduling Conference. (Dkt. 35.) In all events, a status conference is set for March 13, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. (see document for details). (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (dro) (Entered: 09/13/2016) (0) |
| Sep 12, 2016 | 47 | MINUTES OF FUJITSUS MOTION TO STAY ACTION PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEW [DKT 40] Hearing held before Judge Andrew J. Guilford: GRANTED. Court Reporter: Miriam Baird. (lb) (Entered: 09/16/2016) (0) |
| Aug 29, 2016 | 45 | REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Inter Partes Review 40 filed by Counter Claimant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc., Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Supplemental Dec. of Alex Middleton ISO, # 2 Exhibit F, # 3 Exhibit G, # 4 Exhibit H, # 5 Exhibit I, # 6 Exhibit J, # 7 Exhibit K)(Hentschel, Craig) (Entered: 08/29/2016) (0) |
| Aug 23, 2016 | 44 | MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING EX PARTE APPLICATION TO STRIKE FUJITSU'S MOTION TO STAY by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: 41 The Court won't grant the ex parte application, but the Court may require compliance with Local Rule 7-3 in the future. (See document for details.) (dv) (Entered: 08/24/2016) (0) |
| Aug 22, 2016 | 43 | MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Inter Partes Review 40 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Russell Chipman, # 2 Declaration of Lawrence R. LaPorte, # 3 Exhibit 1 to LaPorte Declaration)(LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 08/22/2016) (0) |
| Aug 18, 2016 | 42 | OPPOSITION In Opposition To re: EX PARTE APPLICATION to Strike Fujitsu's Notice of Motion and Motion To Stay Action Pending Inter Partes Review Re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Inter Partes Review 40 and for Order Requiring Fujitsu To Com 41 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Inter Partes Review 40 filed by Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of A. E. Middleton, # 2 Exhibit 1-5 ISO Middleton Decl., # 3 Declaration of G. E. Higgins, # 4 Exhibit A-B ISO Higgins Decl.)(Hentschel, Craig) (Entered: 08/18/2016) (0) |
| Aug 17, 2016 | 41 | EX PARTE APPLICATION to Strike Fujitsu's Notice of Motion and Motion To Stay Action Pending Inter Partes Review Re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Inter Partes Review 40 and for Order Requiring Fujitsu To Comply With the Local Rules For Filing of Motions filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Lawrence R. LaPorte, # 2 Exhibit A to LaPorte Declaration, # 3 Proposed Order) (LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 08/17/2016) (0) |
| Aug 15, 2016 | 40 | NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Inter Partes Review filed by Defendant and Counter Claimant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 9/12/2016 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andrew J. Guilford. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Fujitsus Motion to Stay Action Pending Inter Partes Review, # 2 Memorandum ISO Notice of Motion and Motion to Stay Action Pending Inter Partes Review, # 3 Declaration of A. Middleton ISO Motion to Stay Action Pending Inter Partes Review, # 4 Exhibit Exs. A-E to Decl. of A. Middleton) (Hentschel, Craig) (Entered: 08/15/2016) (0) |
| Aug 8, 2016 | 39 | ANSWER to Amended Counterclaim, 38 filed by Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant Core Optical Technologies, LLC.(LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 08/08/2016) (0) |
| Jul 22, 2016 | 38 | SECOND AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM against Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant Core Optical Technologies, LLC amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 , Counterclaim 18 ; JURY DEMAND, filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.(Hentschel, Craig) (Entered: 07/22/2016) (0) |
| Jul 12, 2016 | 37 | Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Craig Nevin Hentschel counsel for Counter Claimant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc., Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.. Hiroyuki Hagiwara is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.. (Hentschel, Craig) (Entered: 07/12/2016) (0) |
| Jul 8, 2016 | 36 | MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Defendant's Counterclaims re 28 . The Court DENIES the Motion as to the counterclaim of invalidity and GRANTS the Motion as to the counterclaim of non-infringement, with leave to amend. Fujitsu may file an amended counterclaim within 14 days of this Order.(see document for details) (mba) (Entered: 07/08/2016) (0) |
| Jun 27, 2016 | 33 | REPLY in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.'s Amended Counterclaims 28 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 06/27/2016) (0) |
| Jun 27, 2016 | 34 | SCHEDULING ORDER SPECIFYING PROCEDURES: Discovery cut-off 7/28/2017. Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/19/2018 at 8:30 am. Jury Trial set for 4/17/2018 at 9:00 am. (lb) (Entered: 06/29/2016) (0) |
| Jun 27, 2016 | 35 | MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held before Judge Andrew J. Guilford. Cause is called for hearing and counsel make their appearances. Court and counsel confer. The Court sets the following dates: (see document for details). Court Reporter: Miriam Baird. (dro) (Entered: 06/29/2016) (0) |
| Jun 23, 2016 | 32 | JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7-9 court days, filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC.. (LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 06/23/2016) (0) |
| Jun 20, 2016 | 31 | OPPOSITION Brief in Opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.'s Amended Counterclaims 28 filed by Counter Claimant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc., Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Alexander Middleton ISO with Exhibits A-H, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit G, # 9 Exhibit H)(Hentschel, Craig) (Entered: 06/20/2016) (0) |
| Jun 9, 2016 | 28 | NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.'s Amended Counterclaims filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. Motion set for hearing on 7/11/2016 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andrew J. Guilford. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 06/09/2016) (0) |
| Jun 9, 2016 | 29 | MEMORANDUM in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.'s Amended Counterclaims 28 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 06/09/2016) (0) |
| Jun 9, 2016 | 30 | DECLARATION of Lawrence R. LaPorte in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.'s Amended Counterclaims 28 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 06/09/2016) (0) |
| Jun 8, 2016 | 27 | ORDER by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: Granting 16 Non-Resident Attorney Alexander E. Middleton APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications Inc, designating Craig N. Hentschel as local counsel. (lwag) (Entered: 06/09/2016) (0) |
| May 26, 2016 | 25 | AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.. (Hentschel, Craig) (Entered: 05/26/2016) (0) |
| May 26, 2016 | 26 | First AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM against Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant Core Optical Technologies, LLC amending Counterclaim 18 ; JURY DEMAND, filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.(Hentschel, Craig) (Entered: 05/26/2016) (0) |
| May 24, 2016 | 24 | ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: granting 15 Non-Resident Attorney Hiroyuki Hagiwara APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Fijitsu Network Communications,Inc., designating Craig N. Hentschel as local counsel. (lt) (Entered: 05/24/2016) (0) |
| May 19, 2016 | 22 | Joint STIPULATION to Continue Scheduling Conference from June 20, 2016 to June 27, 2016 Re: Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only 20 filed by Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Hentschel, Craig) (Entered: 05/19/2016) (0) |
| May 19, 2016 | 23 | ORDER to Continue Scheduling Conference by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. The Court, having considered the Stipulation 22 Requesting Continuation Of The Scheduling Conference, and finding good cause therefor, hereby ORDERS that: 1. The Scheduling Conference, currently scheduled for June 20, 2016, is set for June 27, 2016, at 9:00 a.m.; (see document for details). (dro) (Entered: 05/19/2016) (0) |
| May 6, 2016 | 20 | ORDER RE EARLY MEETING OF PARTIES AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE. Scheduling Conference set for 6/20/2016 at 9:00 am before Judge Andrew J. Guilford. (ig) (Entered: 05/06/2016) (0) |
| May 6, 2016 | 21 | NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Hiroyuki Hagiwara to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-17770414) 15 , APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Alexander E. Middleton to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-17771249) 16 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s) are specified below: No signature on Application. Local counsel failed to sign the application. See LR 11-1. See Instructions for Applicants (1) note that electronic signatures are not accepted. (G-64); Form is out-of-date. Attorney failed to use current form. Only current Proposed Order used. Form was updated and amended as of May 1, 2016. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (lt) (Entered: 05/06/2016) (0) |
| May 5, 2016 | 15 | APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Hiroyuki Hagiwara to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-17770414) filed by Defendant Fujitsu Network Communicati ons, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing, # 2 Proposed Order) (Hentschel, Craig) (Entered: 05/05/2016) (0) |
| May 5, 2016 | 16 | APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Alexander E. Middleton to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-17771249) filed by Defendant Fujitsu Network Commun ications, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing, # 2 Proposed Order) (Hentschel, Craig) (Entered: 05/05/2016) (0) |
| May 5, 2016 | 17 | ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 JURY DEMAND. filed by Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc..(Hentschel, Craig) (Entered: 05/05/2016) (0) |
| May 5, 2016 | 18 | COUNTERCLAIM against Counterclaim-Defendant Core Optical Technologies, LLC; Jury Demand, filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc..(Hentschel, Craig) (Entered: 05/05/2016) (0) |
| May 5, 2016 | 19 | CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc., (Hentschel, Craig) (Entered: 05/05/2016) (0) |
| Apr 25, 2016 | 14 | Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Craig Nevin Hentschel counsel for Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.. Adding Caroline Greenwood as counsel of record for Defendant, Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.. (Hentschel, Craig) (Entered: 04/25/2016) (0) |
| Apr 5, 2016 | 13 | Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Craig Nevin Hentschel counsel for Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.. Adding Gabrielle E. Higgins as counsel of record for Defendant, Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.. (Hentschel, Craig) (Entered: 04/05/2016) (0) |
| Mar 31, 2016 | 12 | STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc. answer now due 5/5/2016, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 filed by Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc..(Attorney Craig Nevin Hentschel added to party Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.(pty:dft))(Hentschel, Craig) (Entered: 03/31/2016) (0) |
| Mar 22, 2016 | 11 | ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 14-03 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 8:12-cv-01872 AG (JPRx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott and Judge Josephine L. Staton to Judge Andrew J. Guilford and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:16-cv-00437 AG (JPRx). Signed by Judge Andrew J. Guilford (mba) (Entered: 03/22/2016) (0) |
| Mar 15, 2016 | 10 | NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. Related Case(s): SACV 12-1872 AG (JPRx) (LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 03/15/2016) (0) |
| Mar 9, 2016 | 9 | INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (tg) (Entered: 03/09/2016) (0) |
| Mar 8, 2016 | 6 | NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (jtil) (Entered: 03/08/2016) (0) |
| Mar 8, 2016 | 7 | NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) (Entered: 03/08/2016) (0) |
| Mar 8, 2016 | 8 | 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 as to Defendant Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc. (jtil) (Entered: 03/08/2016) (0) |
| Mar 7, 2016 | 1 | COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-17418595 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1) (Attorney Lawrence Robert LaPorte added to party Core Optical Technologies, LLC(pty:pla))(LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 03/07/2016) (0) |
| Mar 7, 2016 | 2 | CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 03/07/2016) (0) |
| Mar 7, 2016 | 3 | Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 03/07/2016) (0) |
| Mar 7, 2016 | 4 | NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC, (LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 03/07/2016) (0) |
| Mar 7, 2016 | 5 | REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (LaPorte, Lawrence) (Entered: 03/07/2016) (0) |
