Case number 2:22-cv-00265
Daedalus Blue LLC v. DJI Technology, Inc. et al > Documents
| Date Field | Doc. No. | Description (Pages) |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2022 | 43 | ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE by Judge George H. Wu. Based upon the Notice of Dismissal filed on November 3, 2022 42 , it is hereby ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party will bear its own attorneys' fees and expenses. RE: Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of an Action (Pursuant to FRCP 41a(1)) 42 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (aco) (Entered: 11/07/2022) (1) |
| Nov 7, 2022 | 44 | REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: # 1 Order) (aco) (Entered: 11/07/2022) (0) |
| Nov 3, 2022 | 42 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff Daedalus Blue LLC. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Hatch, Ryan) (Entered: 11/03/2022) (3) |
| Nov 2, 2022 | 41 | MINUTES IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT by Judge George H. Wu. The Court has received the parties Joint Status Report (ECF No. 40) wherein they indicate that they have resolved the matter and will be filing a dismissal shortly. Based thereon, the November 3, 2022 status conference is taken off-calendar and an Order to Show Cause re Settlement is set for November 17, 2022 at 8:30 a.m. No one need attend the OSC if a dismissal is filed with the Court by November 15. (aco) (Entered: 11/02/2022) (1) |
| Nov 1, 2022 | 40 | STATUS REPORT JOINT STATUS REPORT filed by Plaintiff Daedalus Blue LLC. (Hatch, Ryan) (Entered: 11/01/2022) (2) |
| Oct 31, 2022 | 39 | TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - IN CHAMBERS: by Judge George H. Wu: Counsel are to appear telephonically for Thursday's 11/03/2022 status conference at 8:30 a.m. by contacting the court clerk at javier_gonzalez@cacd.uscourts.gov for dial-in information. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jag) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 10/31/2022) (0) |
| Sep 26, 2022 | 38 | ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY ALL DEADLINES by Judge George H. Wu. It is hereby ORDERED that all deadlines are stayed for forty-five (45) days, so that the parties can finalize their settlement agreement and appropriate dismissal papers may be submitted. The Court sets a status conference for November 3, 2022 at 8:30 a.m. and the parties are to file a joint status report by November 1, 2022. RE: Stipulation to Stay Case 37 . (aco) (Entered: 09/27/2022) (1) |
| Sep 22, 2022 | 37 | Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Signing of Settlement Agreement filed by Plaintiff Daedalus Blue LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Hatch, Ryan) (Entered: 09/22/2022) (0) |
| Sep 1, 2022 | 36 | ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge George H. Wu. The Court hereby GRANTS the Joint Stipulation and ORDERS the following: 1. Plaintiff's deadline for responding to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss shall be up through and including September 22, 2022; and 2. The related motion hearing is rescheduled to October 17, 2022 at 8:30 a.m. RE: Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, 35 . (aco) (Entered: 09/02/2022) (2) |
| Aug 31, 2022 | 35 | Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response as to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint 31 filed by Plaintiff Daedalus Blue LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Hatch, Ryan) (Entered: 08/31/2022) (0) |
| Aug 3, 2022 | 33 | Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Plaintiff's Response as to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint 31 filed by Plaintiff Daedalus Blue LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Hatch, Ryan) (Entered: 08/03/2022) (0) |
| Aug 3, 2022 | 34 | ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISSby Judge George H. Wu. The Court hereby GRANTS the Joint Stipulation and ORDERS the following: 1. Plaintiff's deadline for responding to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss shall be up through and including September 1, 2022; and 2. The related motion hearing is rescheduled to September 26, 2022 at 8:30 a.m. RE: Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, 33 . (aco) (Entered: 08/04/2022) (2) |
| Jul 5, 2022 | 31 | NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Defendants DJI Europe B.V., DJI Research LLC, DJI Technology, Inc., Does, SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd., iFlight Technology Company Limited. Motion set for hearing on 8/25/2022 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, # 3 Declaration of Jacob Schroeder in Support of Motion to Dismiss; Exhibits 1 - 20) (Schroeder, Jacob) (Entered: 07/05/2022) (0) |
| Jul 5, 2022 | 32 | NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant DJI Europe B.V., SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd., identifying iFlight Technology Co. Ltd., SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd., DJI Europe B.V., DJI Technology Inc., DJI Research LLC. (Schroeder, Jacob) (Entered: 07/05/2022) (2) |
| Jun 21, 2022 | 30 | ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 29 by Judge George H. Wu. Defendants' deadline for responding to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint shall be up through and including July 5, 2022. (iv) (Entered: 06/22/2022) (2) |
| Jun 16, 2022 | 29 | STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to iFlight Technology Company Limited answer now due 7/5/2022; SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd. answer now due 7/5/2022; Does answer now due 7/5/2022; DJI Research LLC answer now due 7/5/2022; DJI Technology, Inc. answer now due 7/5/2022; DJI Europe B.V. answer now due 7/5/2022, re Amended Complaint/Petition, 27 filed by Defendants iFlight Technology Company Limited; SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd.; Does; DJI Research LLC; DJI Technology, Inc. ; DJI Europe B.V.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Jacob Adam Schroeder added to party DJI Europe B.V.(pty:dft), Attorney Jacob Adam Schroeder added to party SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd.(pty:dft))(Schroeder, Jacob) (Entered: 06/16/2022) (0) |
| Jun 7, 2022 | 28 | MINUTES IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER by Judge George H. Wu. On June 6, 2022, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint. In light of that filing, the Operative Complaint is no longer the original complaint. As such, the Court VACATES Defendants' Motion to Dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) 25 , filed on May 18, 2022, and set for hearing on June 27, 2022. Defendant may seek any relief it deems appropriate based on the new operative complaint, including by filing motions to dismiss, strike, and/or stay.; vacating 25 MOTION to Dismiss Case. (aco) (Entered: 06/07/2022) (1) |
| Jun 6, 2022 | 27 | Amended Complaint* (1) |
| Jan 12, 2022 | 1 | Complaint* (1) |
