Duk San Neolux Co., Ltd. v. Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd. > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2017-00197
Filing Date Nov 2, 2016
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status Terminated-Denied
Administrative JudgesKimberly McGraw, Justin T. Arbes, Brian P. Murphy
Judge Writing the Final DecisionKimberly McGraw
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 1, 3, 4, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26
Claims Instituted: 1, 3, 4, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
6Duk San Neolux
Attorney Name: Mih Suhn Koh
Vorys Sater Seymour & Pease
Duk San Neolux
Attorney Name: Louis Gubinsky
Vorys Sater Seymour & Pease
Duk San Neolux
Attorney Name: Ari G. Zytcer
Vorys Sater Seymour & Pease
Duk San Neolux
Attorney Name: William H. Oldach III
Vorys Sater Seymour & Pease
Attorney Name: Mih Suhn Koh
Attorney Name: Mih Suhn Koh
Vorys Sater Seymour & Pease
Patent Owner Attorneys
4Attorney Name: Beau B. Burton
Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.
Attorney Name: Jacob A. Doughty
Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.
Attorney Name: Stefan U. Koschmieder
Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.
Related Patents
| Doc No | Title | Issue date |
|---|---|---|
| 09056870 | Material for organic electroluminescence device and organic electroluminescence device using the same | Jun 16, 2015 |
