Case number 2:20-cv-07941
Encoditech LLC v. Aures Technologies, Inc. > Documents
| Date Field | Doc. No. | Description (Pages) |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2021 | 23 | STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Plaintiff Encoditech LLC.(Ritcheson, Steven) (Entered: 04/07/2021) (4) |
| Apr 7, 2021 | 24 | ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE by Judge George H. Wu, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 23 . Based upon the stipulation between the parties and their respective counsel, it is hereby ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party will bear its own attorneys' fees and expenses. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mrgo) (Entered: 04/07/2021) (1) |
| Apr 7, 2021 | 25 | REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: # 1 Dismissal) (mrgo) (Entered: 04/07/2021) (0) |
| Apr 6, 2021 | 22 | NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Continue Scheduling Conference from 4/22/2021 to 5/20/2021 filed by Plaintiff Encoditech LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Ritcheson, Steven) (Entered: 04/06/2021) (0) |
| Apr 6, 2021 | 26 | ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. Wu, re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Continue Scheduling Conference from 4/22/2021 to 5/20/2021 22 . (mrgo) (Entered: 04/07/2021) (1) |
| Mar 2, 2021 | 20 | NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Continue Scheduling Conference from 3/22/2021 to 4/21/2021 filed by Plaintiff Encoditech LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Ritcheson, Steven) (Entered: 03/02/2021) (0) |
| Mar 2, 2021 | 21 | ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. Wu re: 20 MOTION to Continue. Scheduling Conference continued to 4/22/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu with the Joint 26(f) Report being due two weeks before the Scheduling Conference. (mrgo) (Entered: 03/02/2021) (1) |
| Feb 1, 2021 | 19 | ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. Wu re: 17 MOTION to Continue. Based on the motion, the grounds set forth therein, the pleadings and other filings in this case, and the agreement of the Parties to the motion, the Court finds that good cause has been established and Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Continue Scheduling Conference should be granted. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference be continued to March 22, 2021 at 8:30 a.m., with the Joint 26(f) Report being due two weeks before the Scheduling Conference. (mrgo) (Entered: 02/02/2021) (1) |
| Jan 29, 2021 | 18 | ANSWER to Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), Counterclaim 14 with JURY DEMAND filed by Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Encoditech LLC.(Ritcheson, Steven) (Entered: 01/29/2021) (6) |
| Jan 28, 2021 | 17 | NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Continue Scheduling Conference from 2/22/2021 to 3/22/2021 Re: Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only, 15 filed by Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Encoditech LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Ritcheson, Steven) (Entered: 01/28/2021) (0) |
| Jan 13, 2021 | 16 | NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint and Counterclaim 14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lom) (Entered: 01/13/2021) (1) |
| Jan 12, 2021 | 15 | MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. Wu. The Court sets a Scheduling Conference for February 22, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. Counsel are reminded of their obligations to disclose information, confer on a discovery plan, and report to the Court, as required by F.R.C.P. 26 and the Local Rules of this Court. Trial counsel are ordered to be present. A Joint 26(f) Report shall be filed with the Court no later than February 8, 2021. (iv) (Entered: 01/12/2021) (1) |
| Jan 11, 2021 | 14 | ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 with JURY DEMAND , COUNTERCLAIM against Encoditech LLC filed by Defendant Aures Technologies, Inc..(Marino, Fabio) (Entered: 01/11/2021) (13) |
| Nov 30, 2020 | 13 | ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT TO JANUARY 11, 2021 12 by Judge George H. Wu (lc) (Entered: 12/01/2020) (2) |
| Nov 25, 2020 | 12 | MEMORANDUM in Support DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Encoditech LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Fabio E Marino added to party Encoditech LLC(pty:pla))(Marino, Fabio) (Entered: 11/25/2020) (0) |
| Oct 27, 2020 | 11 | STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU by Judge George H. Wu. (See document for details) (mrgo) (Entered: 10/27/2020) (10) |
| Oct 22, 2020 | 10 | NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson to Judge George H. Wu for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:20-cv-07941 GW(GJSx). (rn) (Entered: 10/22/2020) (1) |
| Sep 24, 2020 | 9 | REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (hr) (Entered: 09/24/2020) (1) |
| Sep 1, 2020 | 6 | NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. # 1 CV11C) (jtil). (Entered: 09/01/2020) (0) |
| Sep 1, 2020 | 7 | 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 as to Defendant Aures Technologies, Inc. (jtil) (Entered: 09/01/2020) (2) |
| Sep 1, 2020 | 8 | NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Isaac Rabicoff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) (Entered: 09/01/2020) (1) |
| Aug 31, 2020 | 2 | CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Encoditech LLC. (Ritcheson, Steven) (Entered: 08/31/2020) (1) |
| Aug 31, 2020 | 3 | CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Encoditech LLC identifying NONE as Corporate Parent. (Ritcheson, Steven) (Entered: 08/31/2020) (2) |
| Aug 31, 2020 | 4 | Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 filed by Plaintiff Encoditech LLC. (Ritcheson, Steven) (Entered: 08/31/2020) (2) |
| Aug 31, 2020 | 5 | REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Encoditech LLC. (Ritcheson, Steven) (Entered: 08/31/2020) (1) |
