Esselte Corporation v. DYMO B.V.B.A. > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2015-00779
Filing Date Feb 19, 2015
Institution Decision Date Aug 28, 2015
Decision Date Jan 6, 2016
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status Terminated-Settled
Administrative JudgesBarbara A. Parvis, David C. McKone, Jo-Anne M. Kokoski
Judge Writing the Final DecisionBarbara A. Parvis
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 19, 20, 21, 28
Claims Instituted: 19, 20, 21
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
7Esselte
Attorney Name: Robert Frederickson III
Goodwin Procter LLP
Esselte
Attorney Name: Eleanor M. Yost
Goodwin Procter LLP
Esselte
Attorney Name: Sumedha Ahuja
Goodwin Procter LLP
Esselte
Attorney Name: Jay C. Chiu
Goodwin Procter LLP
Esselte
Attorney Name: Douglas John Kline
Goodwin Procter LLP
Esselte
Attorney Name: Charles H. Sanders
Goodwin Procter LLP
Attorney Name: Mitchell G. Stockwell
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton
Patent Owner Attorneys
4DYMO BVBA
Attorney Name: Thad C. Kodish
Fish & Richardson
DYMO BVBA
Attorney Name: Karl Renner
Fish & Richardson
Attorney Name: Edward G. Faeth
Fish & Richardson
Attorney Name: James Paul Zeller
Marshall Gerstein & Borun
Related Patents
| Doc No | Title | Issue date |
|---|---|---|
| 06152623 | Tape printing apparatus and tape holding cases | Nov 28, 2000 |
