Esselte Corporation v. Sanford L.P. (d/b/a DYMO) > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2015-00771
Filing Date Feb 19, 2015
Institution Decision Date Aug 28, 2015
Decision Date Jan 6, 2016
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status Terminated-Settled
Administrative JudgesBarbara A. Parvis, David C. McKone, Jo-Anne M. Kokoski
Judge Writing the Final DecisionBarbara A. Parvis
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 6
Claims Instituted: 6
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
7Esselte
Attorney Name: Robert Frederickson III
Goodwin Procter LLP
Esselte
Attorney Name: Eleanor M. Yost
Goodwin Procter LLP
Esselte
Attorney Name: Sumedha Ahuja
Goodwin Procter LLP
Esselte
Attorney Name: Douglas John Kline
Goodwin Procter LLP
Esselte
Attorney Name: Jay C. Chiu
Goodwin Procter LLP
Esselte
Attorney Name: Charles H. Sanders
Goodwin Procter LLP
Attorney Name: Mitchell G. Stockwell
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton
Patent Owner Attorneys
3Sanford L.P.
Attorney Name: Thad C. Kodish
Fish & Richardson
Sanford L.P.
Attorney Name: Karl Renner
Fish & Richardson
Attorney Name: Edward G. Faeth
Fish & Richardson
Related Patents
| Doc No | Title | Issue date |
|---|---|---|
| 07140791 | Vertical autosizing printing system | Nov 28, 2006 |
