FireEye, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc. > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2017-00155
Filing Date Oct 28, 2016
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status Institution Denied
Administrative JudgesPatrick M. Boucher, James B. Arpin, Zhenyu Yang
Judge Writing the Final DecisionPatrick M. Boucher
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 1, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 17, 24, 35, 37, 42
Claims Instituted: 1, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 17, 24, 35, 37
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
6FireEye
Attorney Name: Jeffrey R. Cole
DLA Piper
FireEye
Attorney Name: James M. Heintz
DLA Piper
FireEye
Attorney Name: Adam R. Brausa
Morrison & Foerster
FireEye
Attorney Name: Michael T. Rosato
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
FireEye
Attorney Name: Andrew S. Brown
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
FireEye
Attorney Name: Matthew A. Argenti
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
Patent Owner Attorneys
7Finjan Holdings, Inc.
Attorney Name: Michael Kim
Finjan Holdings, Inc.
Finjan Holdings, Inc.
Attorney Name: Shannon H. Hedvat
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel
Finjan Holdings, Inc.
Attorney Name: Mike H. Lee
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel
Finjan Holdings, Inc.
Attorney Name: James R. Hannah
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel
Finjan Holdings, Inc.
Attorney Name: Dawn-marie Bey
Bey & Cotropia
Finjan Holdings, Inc.
Attorney Name: Jeffrey H. Price
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel
Attorney Name: Mike H. Lee
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel
Related Patents
Doc No | Title | Issue date |
---|---|---|
08079086 | Malicious mobile code runtime monitoring system and methods | Dec 13, 2011 |