Ford Motor Company v. Neo Wireless LLC > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2023-00764
Filing Date Mar 28, 2023
Institution Decision Date Jul 17, 2023
Decision Date Feb 7, 2024
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status Terminated-Settled
Administrative JudgesHyun J. Jung, Charles J. Boudreau, Matthew S. Meyers
Judge Writing the Final DecisionHyun J. Jung
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
Claims Instituted: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
7Ford Motor
Attorney Name: Jonathan M. Strang
Latham & Watkins
Ford Motor
Attorney Name: Matthew J. Moore
Latham & Watkins
Ford Motor
Attorney Name: Ashley Nicole Finger
Latham & Watkins
Ford Motor
Attorney Name: Kumar Ravula
Latham & Watkins
Ford Motor
Attorney Name: Christopher C. Smith
Brooks Kushman
Ford Motor
Attorney Name: Kyle G. Konz
Brooks Kushman
Ford Motor
Attorney Name: John S. Leroy
Brooks Kushman
Patent Owner Attorneys
5Neo Wireless LLC
Attorney Name: Parham Hendifar
Lowenstein & Weatherwax
Neo Wireless LLC
Attorney Name: Hamad M. Hamad
Caldwell Cassady & Curry
Neo Wireless LLC
Attorney Name: Anthony S. Volpe
Volpe and Koenig
Neo Wireless LLC
Attorney Name: C. Frederick Koenig III
Volpe and Koenig
Related Patents
| Doc No | Title | Issue date |
|---|---|---|
| 10965512 | Method and apparatus using cell-specific and common pilot subcarriers in multi-carrier, multi cell wireless communication networks | Mar 30, 2021 |
