Ford Motor Company v. Neo Wireless LLC > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2023-00765
Filing Date Mar 28, 2023
Institution Decision Date Oct 2, 2023
Decision Date Oct 2, 2023
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status Institution Denied
Administrative JudgesMatthew S. Meyers, Hyun J. Jung, Stephen E. Belisle
Judge Writing the Final DecisionMatthew S. Meyers
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
7Ford Motor
Attorney Name: Ashley Nicole Finger
Latham & Watkins
Ford Motor
Attorney Name: Matthew J. Moore
Latham & Watkins
Ford Motor
Attorney Name: Jonathan M. Strang
Latham & Watkins
Ford Motor
Attorney Name: Kumar Ravula
Latham & Watkins
Ford Motor
Attorney Name: John S. Leroy
Brooks Kushman
Ford Motor
Attorney Name: Christopher C. Smith
Brooks Kushman
Ford Motor
Attorney Name: Kyle G. Konz
Brooks Kushman
Patent Owner Attorneys
5Neo Wireless LLC
Attorney Name: Anthony S. Volpe
Volpe and Koenig
Neo Wireless LLC
Attorney Name: C. Frederick Koenig III
Volpe and Koenig
Neo Wireless LLC
Attorney Name: Parham Hendifar
Lowenstein & Weatherwax
Neo Wireless LLC
Attorney Name: Kenneth James Weatherwax
Lowenstein & Weatherwax
Neo Wireless LLC
Attorney Name: Hamad M. Hamad
Caldwell Cassady & Curry
Related Patents
| Doc No | Title | Issue date |
|---|---|---|
| 10833908 | Channel probing signal for a broadband communication system | Nov 10, 2020 |
