Gen Digital Inc. v. Kajeet, Inc. > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2022-00001
Filing Date Oct 1, 2021
Institution Decision Date Apr 21, 2022
Decision Date Apr 13, 2023
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status Final Written Decision
Administrative JudgesMeredith C. Petravick, Juliet Mitchell Dirba, Iftikhar Ahmed
Judge Writing the Final DecisionMeredith C. Petravick
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 27, 28, 29
Claims Instituted: 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 27, 28, 29
Claims Invalidated: 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 27, 28, 29
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
5Gen Digital Inc.
Attorney Name: Charanjit Brahma
Benesch
Gen Digital Inc.
Attorney Name: Manish K. Mehta
Benesch
Gen Digital Inc.
Attorney Name: Samuel J. Ruggio
Benesch
Gen Digital Inc.
Attorney Name: Cristina Q. Almendarez
Benesch
Gen Digital Inc.
Attorney Name: Vijay Madisetti
Gen Digital Inc.
Patent Owner Attorneys
7Kajeet, Inc.
Attorney Name: Richard A. Wojcio Jr.
Friedman Suder & Cooke
Kajeet, Inc.
Attorney Name: Corby R. Vowell
Friedman Suder & Cooke
Kajeet, Inc.
Attorney Name: Timothy D. Casey
Baker & Hostetler LLP
Kajeet, Inc.
Attorney Name: Jonathan T. Suder
Friedman Suder & Cooke
Kajeet, Inc.
Attorney Name: Robert L. Hails Jr.
Baker & Hostetler LLP
Kajeet, Inc.
Attorney Name: Jason F. Hoffman
Baker & Hostetler LLP
Kajeet, Inc.
Attorney Name: Chetan Sharma
Friedman Suder & Cooke
Related Patents
| Doc No | Title | Issue date |
|---|---|---|
| 08667559 | Feature management of a communication device | Mar 4, 2014 |
