HTC Corporation v. E-Watch Inc. > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2014-00989
Filing Date Jun 19, 2014
Institution Decision Date Dec 9, 2014
Decision Date Sep 17, 2015
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status Terminated-Settled
Administrative JudgesJameson Lee, Gregg I. Anderson, Matthew R. Clements
Judge Writing the Final DecisionMatthew R. Clements
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 31
Claims Instituted: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 31
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
4HTC Corporation
Attorney Name: Bing Ai
Perkins Coie
HTC Corporation
Attorney Name: Cheng (Jack) Ko
Perkins Coie
HTC Corporation
Attorney Name: Kevin J. Patariu
Perkins Coie
HTC Corporation
Attorney Name: Babak Tehranchi
Perkins Coie
Patent Owner Attorneys
7Samsung Electronics
Attorney Name: Naveen Modi
Paul Hastings
e-WATCH
Attorney Name: Robert Clinton Curfiss
Independent Attorney
e-WATCH
Attorney Name: David O. Simmons
IVC Patent Agency
e-WATCH
Attorney Name: Naveen Modi
Paul Hastings
Attorney Name: Steven L Park
Paul Hastings
Attorney Name: Elizabeth L. Brann
Paul Hastings
Attorney Name: Gregory Stephen Donahue
DiNovo Price
Related Patents
Doc No | Title | Issue date |
---|---|---|
07643168 | Apparatus for capturing, converting and transmitting a visual image signal via a digital transmission system | Jan 5, 2010 |