Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company v. Chrimar Systems, Inc. > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2019-00032
Filing Date Oct 4, 2018
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status Terminated-Denied
Administrative JudgesFrederick C. Laney, Karl D. Easthom, Robert J. Weinschenk
Judge Writing the Final DecisionFrederick C. Laney
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 1, 5, 6, 10, 13, 16, 22, 25, 26, 29, 30, 67, 73, 80, 88, 106, 108, 114, 121, 129, 147
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
6Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Attorney Name: Brent A. Hawkins
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Attorney Name: Hersh H. Mehta
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Attorney Name: Karon N. Fowler
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Attorney Name: Michael R. Fleming
Irell & Manella LLP
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Attorney Name: George A. Zimmerman
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
Patent Owner Attorneys
5chrimar systems
Attorney Name: Christopher C. Smith
Brooks Kushman
chrimar systems
Attorney Name: Marc Lorelli
Brooks Kushman
chrimar systems
Attorney Name: Thomas A. Lewry
Brooks Kushman
chrimar systems
Attorney Name: Frank A. Angileri
Brooks Kushman
chrimar systems
Attorney Name: Richard W. Hoffmann
Reising Ethington P.C.
Related Patents
| Doc No | Title | Issue date |
|---|---|---|
| 08155012 | System and method for adapting a piece of terminal equipment | Apr 10, 2012 |
