Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company v. Chrimar Systems, Inc. > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2019-00658
Filing Date Feb 8, 2019
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status Terminated-Denied
Administrative JudgesKarl D. Easthom, Robert J. Weinschenk, Frederick C. Laney
Judge Writing the Final DecisionKarl D. Easthom
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 1, 4, 5, 10, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 22, 23, 26, 27, 30, 33, 34, 36, 37, 38, 49, 64
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
5Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Attorney Name: Brent A. Hawkins
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Attorney Name: Maria E. Doukas
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Attorney Name: Karon N. Fowler
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
Silicon Image
Attorney Name: George A. Zimmerman
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
Patent Owner Attorneys
4chrimar systems
Attorney Name: Christopher C. Smith
Brooks Kushman
chrimar systems
Attorney Name: Marc Lorelli
Brooks Kushman
chrimar systems
Attorney Name: Thomas A. Lewry
Brooks Kushman
chrimar systems
Attorney Name: Frank A. Angileri
Brooks Kushman
Related Patents
Doc No | Title | Issue date |
---|---|---|
09812825 | Ethernet device | Nov 7, 2017 |