Case number 1:21-cv-01484
ImmerVision, Inc. v. Apple, Inc. > Documents
| Date Field | Doc. No. | Description (Pages) |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2023 | 157 | STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order Staying Cases Pending Resolution of Disputes in Related Actions by Apple, Inc.. (Palapura, Bindu) (Entered: 10/04/2023) (3) |
| Sep 26, 2023 | 156 | ORAL ORDER Setting Videoconference: The Court hereby ORDERS that a videoconference to hear argument on Defendant's Motion to Stay Pending IPR ("Motion"), (D.I. 147 in Civil Action No. 21-1484-MN-CJB; D.I. 163 in 21-1733-MN-CJB; D.I. 144 in 21-1570-MN-CJB,), is set for October 16, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. before Judge Christopher J. Burke via the Microsoft Teams platform. By no later than October 6, 2023, the parties shall send an e-mail to the Court's Courtroom Deputy, Ms. Benyo, indicating the names and e-mail addresses of all individuals who will participate in the hearing. The Court may choose to resolve the Motion prior to the videoconference and will, in that event, cancel the videoconference (however, if any party advises the Court in advance that a newer attorney will argue the dispute, see Standing Order Regarding Courtroom Opportunities for Newer Attorneys, https://www.ded.uscourts.gov/sites/ded/files/StandingOrder2017.pdf, then the Court will go forward with the conference). Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 9/26/2023. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB(dlb) (Entered: 09/26/2023) (0) |
| Sep 25, 2023 | 154 | Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Keith A. Jones regarding request for the scheduling of a teleconference - re 147 MOTION to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review. (Jones, Keith) (Entered: 09/25/2023) (1) |
| Sep 25, 2023 | 155 | Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from David E. Moore regarding reply letter brief to motion to stay pending inter partes review - re (147 in 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 163 in 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB, 144 in 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB) MOTION to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 5-8)(Moore, David) (Entered: 09/25/2023) (0) |
| Sep 22, 2023 | 153 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff's Fourth Set of Interrogatories to Defendant filed by ImmerVision, Inc..(Jones, Keith) (Entered: 09/22/2023) (3) |
| Sep 20, 2023 | 152 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Apple Inc.'s Supplemental Responses And Objections To Plaintiff ImmerVision, Inc.'s Second Set Of Interrogatories (Nos. 6-7) [Highly Confidential Attorneys' Eyes Only] filed by Apple, Inc..(Palapura, Bindu) (Entered: 09/20/2023) (2) |
| Sep 19, 2023 | 151 | Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from John D. Simmons regarding Plaintiff ImmerVision, Inc.'s response to Defendant Apple Inc.'s letter requesting to stay - re 148 Letter,. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Simmons, John) (Entered: 09/19/2023) (0) |
| Sep 18, 2023 | 150 | NOTICE requesting Clerk to remove Brandon R. Harper as co-counsel. Reason for request: no longer with the firm of Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP. (Moore, David) (Entered: 09/18/2023) (2) |
| Sep 15, 2023 | 149 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of (1) Plaintiff ImmerVision, Inc.'s Supplemental Responses and Objections to Defendant Apple Inc.'s First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-9), and (2) Plaintiff ImmerVision, Inc.'s Supplemental Responses and Objections to Defendant Apple Inc.'s Third Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 11-12) filed by ImmerVision, Inc..(Jones, Keith) (Entered: 09/15/2023) (3) |
| Sep 12, 2023 | 147 | MOTION to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review - filed by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Moore, David) (Entered: 09/12/2023) (0) |
| Sep 12, 2023 | 148 | Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from David E. Moore regarding motion to stay pending inter partes review - re (147 in 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 163 in 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB, 144 in 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB) MOTION to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1-4)(Moore, David) (Entered: 09/12/2023) (0) |
| Aug 30, 2023 | 145 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Apple Inc.'s Second Amended Initial Disclosures filed by Apple, Inc..(Moore, David) (Entered: 08/30/2023) (2) |
| Aug 30, 2023 | 146 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Apple Inc.'s Responses And Objections To Plaintiff ImmerVision, Inc.'s Third Set Of Interrogatories (No. 8), and Defendant Apple Inc.'s Responses And Objections To Plaintiff ImmerVision, Inc.'s Third Set Of Requests For Production (Nos. 45-48) filed by Apple, Inc..(Moore, David) (Entered: 08/30/2023) (2) |
| Aug 28, 2023 | 144 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff's Final Identification of Accused Products, Asserted Patents, Damages Model, and Prosecution File History filed by ImmerVision, Inc..(Jones, Keith) (Entered: 08/28/2023) (3) |
| Aug 25, 2023 | 143 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Apple Inc.'s Final Supplemental Identification Of Invalidity References filed by Apple, Inc..(Moore, David) (Entered: 08/25/2023) (2) |
| Aug 22, 2023 | 142 | ORAL ORDER: The Court has reviewed the joint discovery dispute motion ("Motion") filed by Defendant and by third parties Venson and Steven Shaw ("the Shaws"), via which Defendant requests that the Court enter an order to show cause permitting Defendant to produce a license agreement ("Agreement") between it, the Shaws and Sony Corp. (an entity that has already agreed to production) to Plaintiff, (D.I. 97, in Civil Action No. 21-1484-MN-CJB, the only case docket that will be cited herein). It has also reviewed the briefing related to the Motion. (D.I. 80; D.I. 85; D.I. 93; D.I. 94) Having done so, and understanding that the Shaws oppose Defendant's request, the Court ORDERS that Defendant's request is GRANTED and that the Agreement shall be produced. The Shaws object to such production on a few grounds, none of which are persuasive. First, they argue that the Agreement is not responsive to Plaintiff's RFP No. 22 nor relevant to the subject matter of this litigation. (D.I. 85 at 1-2) But the RFP's language is broad (seeking license agreements of Defendant "concerning" "the wide-angle or panoramic image capture capabilities of any product"), (D.I. 80, ex. 1), and it is undisputed that the Shaws' patent covered by the Agreement relates to "image sensors used to capture images[,]" (D.I. 80 at 2), which are components that can be said to "concern[]" a camera's image capture capabilities, (D.I. 93 at 1). Moreover, such an Agreement could be relevant to damages in this case, since potentially comparable licenses may come in many different flavors, and often parties attempt to utilize a license from the field of the invention in order to argue about relevant royalty rates (even if the license relates to technology that is not on all fours with every aspect of the claimed invention). Second, the Shaws suggest that the Agreement is not relevant or need not be produced because it is not a "core technical document." (D.I. 85 at 1-2; D.I. 94 at 1) But as Defendant correctly notes, (D.I. 93 at 2), core technical documents are only one type of relevant discovery in this case (one that happens to be called out by the Scheduling Order). Other types of relevant discovery may also be sought via a RFP (as with RFP No. 22 here). And third, the Shaws argue that Section 7.1(iii) of the Agreement prohibits the production of the Agreement in circumstances like these. (D.I. 85 at 2; D.I. 94 at 1) Of course, even were the Shaws correct as to Section 7.1(iii)'s meaning, that still would be no bar to production. See I.E.E. Int'l Elecs. & Engineering, S.A. v. TK Holdings, Inc., Case No. 10-13487, 2013 WL 12183637, at *1 (E.D. Mich. June 24, 2013). But the Court agrees with Defendant, (D.I. 93 at 1-2), that Section 7.1(iii) actually does permit disclosure of the Agreement by Defendant (after provision of prior notice to the Shaws, which has been afforded here). The Shaws appear to read Section 7.1(iii) as only allowing disclosure in a case being litigated between the Parties to the Agreement (e.g., between the Shaws and Defendant). (D.I. 85 at 2; D.I. 94 at 1) But that reading is not supported by the Agreement's text. Section 7.1(iii) covers what occurs "during the course of litigation"; were the Shaws' reading correct, one would have expected the subsection to instead read "during the course of litigation between the [Agreement's] Parties" (a group that includes only Defendant, the Shaws and/or Sony). And Section 7.1(iii) refers to "litigating parties" when describing how and to whom the Agreement will be produced during litigation, not simply "the Parties" to the Agreement. Therefore, in accordance with Section 7.1(iii), Defendant shall produce the Agreement to Plaintiff in the manner set out in Defendant's reply letter. (D.I. 93 at 2). Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 8/22/2023. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB(dlb) (Entered: 08/22/2023) (0) |
| Aug 16, 2023 | 141 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Apple Inc.'s Supplemental Responses And Objections To Plaintiff ImmerVision, Inc.'s First Set Of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-5) [Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only] filed by Apple, Inc..(Moore, David) (Entered: 08/16/2023) (2) |
| Aug 11, 2023 | 140 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff's Second Supplemental Disclosures Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1)(A) filed by ImmerVision, Inc..(Jones, Keith) (Entered: 08/11/2023) (3) |
| Aug 8, 2023 | 139 | SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 8/8/2023. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB(dlb) (Entered: 08/08/2023) (11) |
| Aug 7, 2023 | 138 | Interim STATUS REPORT (Joint) by Apple, Inc.. (Moore, David) (Entered: 08/07/2023) (2) |
| Aug 4, 2023 | 136 | ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' joint motion to resolve a protective order dispute, (D.I. 122 in Civil Action No. 21-1484-MN-CJB, which will be the only case's docket index that is cited herein), and the briefing related thereto, (D.I. 121; D.I. 126; D.I. 130), hereby ORDERS that Defendant has demonstrated good cause such that its position should prevail and that its proposed Supplemental Protective Order ("SPO"), (D.I. 121, ex. F), should be entered. Defendant did here what too few parties in discovery disputes do: it made a detailed factual record, supported by multiple sworn declarations, that strongly supported its arguments. That is, Defendant has demonstrated that the "highly technical details necessary to fabricate [its] proprietary... lens designs" are, "in effect, the source code of lenses" and "are as commercially sensitive as any other form of source code[,]" such that they should receive the heightened form of protection set out in the SPO. (D.I. 126 at 1) It did so by showing that: (1) the lens prescriptions at issue amount to extremely precise, detailed information about a lens, including its physical dimensions, the arrangement of its optical elements, its materials and its overall layout; (2) these prescriptions are far more detailed than schematics, diagrams, specifications or other technical documents, as a person with knowledge of the latter types of documents could not reverse engineer the accused lens designs; (3) yet if one had access to the prescriptions at issue, they would provide a level of detail that would allow a lens designer to model or reconstruct or replicate the lens itself, which is otherwise incredibly difficult to do in light of the complexity of these designs; (4) the lens prescriptions at issue are very valuable assets in the mobile device industry, as they are the product of significant investments of time and resources resulting from years of research and development by multiple engineers and teams at Defendant; and (5) the files containing these prescriptions are treated as highly sensitive and proprietary materials at Defendant, they are subject to access controls at Defendant beyond what is generally applicable to confidential or proprietary material (including that they are stored in access-controlled repositories and access to them is granted only on a need-to-know-basis to a limited subset of Defendant employees), and they are shared only on an as-needed basis with vendors, who have contractual obligations to maintain their secrecy. (Id., ex. A at paras. 13-17; id., ex. B at paras. 6-9) In cases like this, involving discovery materials that are akin to software-based source code, our Court has blessed the type of heightened protections for such material sought here by Defendant. See Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Zur Forderung Der Angewandten Forschung E.V. v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc., Civil Action No. 17-184-JFB-SRF, 2017 WL 4564742, at *2 (D. Del. Oct. 13, 2017) (defining "source code" to include "hardware-based code," because the hardware-based code "identifie[d] how the [circuit] chips themselves are made") (citing cases); cf. Karl Storz Endoscopy-Am., Inc. v. Stryker Corp., Case No. 14-cv-00876-RS (JSC), 2016 WL 3129215, at *11-12 (N.D. Cal. June 2, 2016) (agreeing with defendant that the design history file for its camera system is "akin to source code because it sets forth how the system operates, and that competitors could use the information to design or modify products that replace [defendant's] products[,]" and ordering that the materials at issue triggered a prosecution bar, the highest tier of protection discussed in the protective order at issue). The Court also finds that the burden to Plaintiff of abiding by these protections is not undue, in part because it will hold Defendant to its promise to make the materials available to Plaintiff not only in Chicago (where Defendant's counsel is located), but also in Santa Monica (not far from Plaintiff's expert), in Delaware (near Plaintiff's counsel) or wherever else the parties can mutually agree on. (D.I. 126 at 3; D.I. 130 at 1) The videoconference previously scheduled for August 7, 2023 is hereby CANCELED. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 8/4/2023. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB(dlb) (Entered: 08/04/2023) (0) |
| Aug 4, 2023 | 137 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Apple Inc.'s Amended Initial Disclosures filed by Apple, Inc..(Moore, David) (Entered: 08/04/2023) (2) |
| Aug 1, 2023 | 135 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of (1) Plaintiff's Third Set of Requests for Production to Defendant, and (2) Plaintiff's Third Set of Interrogatories to Defendant filed by ImmerVision, Inc..(Jones, Keith) (Entered: 08/01/2023) (3) |
| Jul 25, 2023 | 132 | ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' July 21, 2023 letter, hereby ORDERS that the July 27, 2023 Markman hearing will be held in Courtroom 2A. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 7/25/2023. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB(dlb) (Entered: 07/25/2023) (0) |
| Jul 25, 2023 | 133 | MOTION [Apple Inc.'s Motion and Proposed Order Granting Limited Exemption From the Standing Order Regarding Personal Electronic Devices] - filed by Apple, Inc.. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Palapura, Bindu) (Entered: 07/25/2023) (2) |
| Jul 25, 2023 | 134 | ORDER granting D.I. (133) in case 21-cv-01484 and D.I. (130) in case 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB and D.I. (149) in case 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB [Apple Inc.'s Motion and Proposed Order Granting Limited Exemption From the Standing Order Regarding Personal Electronic Devices]. Signed by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 7/25/2023. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB(dlb) (Entered: 07/25/2023) (2) |
| Jul 21, 2023 | 131 | Joint Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from John D. Simmons and David E. Moore regarding the July 27, 2023, Claim Construction Hearing - re 127 Oral Order,,,,,,,. (Simmons, John) (Entered: 07/21/2023) (2) |
| Jul 19, 2023 | 130 | Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from John D. Simmons regarding reply discovery dispute letter brief - re 113 Order Setting Videoconference,,,,,,,. (Simmons, John) (Entered: 07/19/2023) (2) |
| Jul 18, 2023 | 129 | REQUEST for Oral Argument by Apple, Inc. re 110 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings . (Moore, David) (Entered: 07/18/2023) (2) |
| Jul 17, 2023 | 127 | ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' June 29, 2023 letter regarding the Markman hearing ("Letter"), (Civil Action No. 21-1484-MN-CJB, D.I. 120; Civil Action No. 21-1570-MN-CJB, D.I. 121; Civil Action No. 21-1733-MN-CJB, D.I. 140), hereby ORDERS as follows: (1) The Court hereby ADOPTS the parties' proposal regarding time allocation. Three hours will be allocated for argument, to be split equally between the parties.; (2) The Court also hereby ADOPTS the parties' proposal regarding the order of terms and which side will present argument first for each term.; (3) On or before July 24, 2023, Delaware and lead counsel for the parties shall meet and confer and file an amended joint claim construction chart that sets forth the terms/issues that remain in dispute. The meet and confer shall focus on an attempt to reach agreement on any remaining disputed terms/issues where possible and on an attempt to focus the dispute over the remaining terms/issues in light of the parties' claim construction briefing. By no later July 24, 2023, the parties shall also file a letter, identifying by name each individual who participated in this meet and confer, when and how that meet and confer occurred and how long it lasted. If no agreements on constructions have been reached or if no dispute has been narrowed on the meet and confer, the letter shall so state and the parties need not file an amended joint claim construction chart.; and (4) In the July 24 letter, the parties should also let the Court know if there is joint agreement to conduct the Markman hearing via videoconference. If there is joint agreement, the Court will do so; if there is not joint agreement, then the hearing will go forward as an in-person hearing in Courtroom 2A. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 7/17/2023. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB(dlb) (Entered: 07/17/2023) (0) |
| Jul 17, 2023 | 128 | REPLY BRIEF re 110 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Apple, Inc.. (Moore, David) (Main Document 128 replaced on 7/18/2023) (dlb). (Entered: 07/17/2023) (15) |
| Jul 12, 2023 | 125 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Apple Inc.'s Supplemental Responses and Objections to Plaintiff ImmerVision, Inc.'s First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-5) [Highly Confidential-Attorneys' Eyes Only] filed by Apple, Inc..(Moore, David) (Entered: 07/12/2023) (2) |
| Jul 12, 2023 | 126 | Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from David E. Moore regarding responsive discovery dispute letter brief - re (122 in 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB) Letter, (141 in 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB) Letter, (121 in 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB) Letter. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-C)(Moore, David) (Entered: 07/12/2023) (0) |
| Jul 11, 2023 | 124 | REQUEST for Oral Argument by ImmerVision, Inc. re 110 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings . (Simmons, John) (Entered: 07/11/2023) (1) |
| Jul 10, 2023 | 123 | ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re 110 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by ImmerVision, Inc..Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 7/17/2023. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E)(Simmons, John) (Entered: 07/10/2023) (0) |
| Jul 5, 2023 | 121 | Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from John D. Simmons regarding Discovery Dispute. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(Simmons, John) (Entered: 07/05/2023) (0) |
| Jul 5, 2023 | 122 | Joint MOTION for Videoconference to Resolve Discovery Dispute - filed by ImmerVision, Inc.. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Simmons, John) (Entered: 07/05/2023) (2) |
| Jun 29, 2023 | 120 | Joint Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from John D. Simmons and David E. Moore regarding the July 27, 2023, Claim Construction Hearing. (Simmons, John) (Entered: 06/29/2023) (2) |
| Jun 27, 2023 | 117 | MOTION for Claim Construction re 71 Claim Construction Chart - filed by ImmerVision, Inc.. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Simmons, John) (Entered: 06/27/2023) (2) |
| Jun 27, 2023 | 118 | MOTION for Claim Construction re (71 in 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB) Claim Construction Chart, (91 in 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB) Claim Construction Chart, (66 in 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB) Claim Construction Chart - filed by Apple, Inc.. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Moore, David) (Entered: 06/27/2023) (2) |
| Jun 27, 2023 | 119 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Apple Inc.'s Responses and Objections to Plaintiff ImmerVision, Inc.'s First Set of Requests for Admission (Nos. 1-7) [Highly Confidential-Attorneys' Eyes Only]; Defendant Apple Inc.'s Responses and Objections to Plaintiff ImmerVision, Inc.'s Second Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 6-7); and Defendant Apple Inc.'s Responses and Objections to Plaintiff ImmerVision, Inc.'s Second Set of Requests for Production (Nos. 39-44) filed by Apple, Inc..(Brown, Andrew) (Entered: 06/27/2023) (2) |
| Jun 26, 2023 | 116 | ORAL ORDER: The Court notes as follows: (1) The parties were required by the Scheduling Order to each file concurrently with the Joint Claim Construction Chart a "Motion for Claim Construction[.]" (Civil Action No. 21-1484, D.I. 26 at para. 13; Civil Action No. 21-1570, D.I. 21 at para. 13; Civil Action No. 21-1733, D.I. 41 at para. 13) The parties have not done so. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that by no later than June 27, 2023, the parties shall each file the required Motion for Claim Construction.; and (2) The parties were also required by the Scheduling Order to submit a joint letter detailing, among other things, whether the parties request leave to present live testimony at the Markman hearing and the amount of time the parties are requesting for argument. (Civil Action No. 21-1484, D.I. 26 at para. 15; Civil Action No. 21-1570, D.I. 21 at para. 15; Civil Action No. 21-1733, D.I. 41 at para. 15) The parties have not complied with this requirement either. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that by no later than June 30, 2023, the parties shall submit this joint letter to the Court. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 6/26/2023. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB(mlc) (Entered: 06/26/2023) (0) |
| Jun 21, 2023 | 112 | Joint STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order to Extend Time by ImmerVision, Inc.. (Simmons, John) (Entered: 06/21/2023) (2) |
| Jun 21, 2023 | 113 | ORAL ORDER Setting Videoconference: The Court, having reviewed the parties' June 15, 2023 letter requesting a discovery dispute teleconference regarding one dispute, hereby ORDERS as follows: (1) A Videoconference utilizing the Microsoft Teams platform is set for August 7, 2023 at 2:00 p.m. before Judge Christopher J. Burke.; (2) By no later than July 5, 2023, Plaintiff shall file with the Court a letter, not to exceed three single-spaced pages, in no less than 12-point font, outlining the issues in dispute and its position on those issues. By no later than July 12, 2023, Defendant shall file a letter, not to exceed three single-spaced pages, in no less than 12-point font, outlining its reasons for its opposition. By no later than July 19, 2023, Plaintiff shall file a reply letter brief, not to exceed one single-spaced page, in no less than 12-point font.; (3) By no later than July 19, 2023, the parties shall send an e-mail to the Court's Courtroom Deputy, Ms. Benyo, indicating the names and e-mail addresses of all individuals who will participate in the hearing.; (4) The parties shall jointly file a Motion for Videoconference to Resolve Discovery Dispute.; (5) The parties should consult and follow Judge Burke's "Guidelines for Discovery Disputes," which is found in the "Guidelines" tab on Judge Burke's portion of the District Courts website.; and (6) The Court may choose to resolve the disputes prior to the videoconference and will, in that event, cancel the hearing (however, if any party advises the Court in advance that a newer attorney will argue the dispute, see Standing Order Regarding Courtroom Opportunities for Newer Attorneys, https://www.ded.uscourts.gov/sites/ded/files/StandingOrder2017.pdf, then the Court will go forward with the hearing). Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 6/21/2023. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB(dlb) (Entered: 06/21/2023) (0) |
| Jun 21, 2023 | 114 | [SEALED] Letter to Judge Burke, from Venson Shaw and Steven Shaw, regarding disagreements to D.I. 98 letter. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Venson Shaw, # 2 Affidavit of Steven M. Shaw, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(apk) (Entered: 06/22/2023) (0) |
| Jun 20, 2023 | 115 | [SEALED] Letter to Judge Burke and Clerk's Office from Venson Shaw and Steven Shaw - no redactions to "letter to show cause". Letter is labeled as filed under seal and contains copies of a letter dated 6/13/2023 that "disagrees with Apple response at D.I. 98." Filing also contains Affidavit which contains personal identifiers of Messers. Shaw, and a Proposed Order to Show Cause which also appears to be filed at D.I. 114 in this case. (dlb) (Entered: 06/22/2023) (0) |
| Jun 15, 2023 | 109 | Joint Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from John D. Simmons regarding Joint Request for a Discovery/Protective Order Dispute Teleconference. (Simmons, John) (Entered: 06/15/2023) (1) |
| Jun 15, 2023 | 110 | MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings - filed by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Palapura, Bindu) (Entered: 06/15/2023) (0) |
| Jun 15, 2023 | 111 | OPENING BRIEF in Support re 110 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Apple, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 6/29/2023. (Palapura, Bindu) (Entered: 06/15/2023) (14) |
| Jun 9, 2023 | 107 | STATEMENT Plaintiff ImmerVision, Inc.'s Comments on Defendant Apple Inc.'s Technology Tutorial by ImmerVision, Inc.. (Simmons, John) (Entered: 06/09/2023) (4) |
| Jun 9, 2023 | 108 | STATEMENT [Defendant Apple Inc.'s Comments on Plaintiff ImmerVision, Inc.'s Technology Tutorial] by Apple, Inc.. (Palapura, Bindu) (Entered: 06/09/2023) (4) |
| Jun 8, 2023 | 106 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff's Production of Documents marked IMV0043327 to IMV0043411 filed by ImmerVision, Inc..(Jones, Keith) (Entered: 06/08/2023) (3) |
| Jun 2, 2023 | 99 | NOTICE of Filing of Multi-Media Materials in Electronic Format with the Office of the Clerk by ImmerVision, Inc. (Jones, Keith) (Entered: 06/02/2023) (3) |
| Jun 2, 2023 | 100 | Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from David E. Moore regarding enclosure of Defendant's Technology Tutorial. (Moore, David) (Entered: 06/02/2023) (1) |
| Jun 2, 2023 | 101 | JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF filed by ImmerVision, Inc.. (Simmons, John) (Entered: 06/02/2023) (30) |
| Jun 2, 2023 | 102 | Joint APPENDIX re 101 Joint Claim Construction Brief by ImmerVision, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Tab 1 - March 14, 2023 Declaration of Daniel Reiley and Exhibits A to L, # 2 Tab 2 - May 5, 2023 Declaration of Daniel Reiley and Exhibit M, # 3 Tab 3 - Exhibit 1 to Exhibit 15)(Simmons, John) (Entered: 06/02/2023) (0) |
| Jun 2, 2023 | 103 | MULTI MEDIA DOCUMENT filed by ImmerVision, Inc. in the form of a 1 flash drive. Filing related to (99 in 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB) Notice (Other), (104 in 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB) Notice (Other), (122 in 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB) Notice (Other). (Media on file in Clerk's Office). Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB(dlb) (Entered: 06/02/2023) (0) |
| Jun 2, 2023 | 104 | MULTI MEDIA DOCUMENT filed by Apple, Inc. in the form of a 2 Flash drives. Filing related to (123 in 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB, 105 in 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB, 100 in 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB) Letter. (Media on file in Clerk's Office). Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB(dlb) (Entered: 06/02/2023) (0) |
| Jun 2, 2023 | 105 | Letter to Judge Burke and Clerk's Office from Venson Shaw and Steven Shaw regarding No redactions requested for D.I. 94 - re 94 Letter. (dlb) (Entered: 06/05/2023) (2) |
| Jun 1, 2023 | 96 | REDACTED VERSION of (116 in 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB, 95 in 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB, 93 in 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB) Letter, by Apple, Inc.. (Moore, David) (Entered: 06/01/2023) (4) |
| Jun 1, 2023 | 97 | Joint MOTION [Joint Motion to Resolve Discovery Dispute re Order to Show Cause] re (109 in 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB, 86 in 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 84 in 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB) Oral Order,,,,, - filed by Apple, Inc.. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Palapura, Bindu) (Entered: 06/01/2023) (3) |
| Jun 1, 2023 | 98 | Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from David E. Moore regarding response to the Shaws' letter to the Court dated May 22, 2023, and entered on the docket on May 24, 2023 - re (90 in 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB) Letter, (113 in 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB) Letter, (92 in 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB) Letter,. (Moore, David) (Entered: 06/01/2023) (1) |
| May 30, 2023 | 94 | (UNSEALED) Reply Letter to Judge Burke from Venson Shaw and Steven Shaw regarding Letter at D.I. 93 - re 93 Letter (Redacted to remove personal identifiers). (dlb) Modified on 6/5/2023 (dlb). (Entered: 05/30/2023) (7) |
| May 30, 2023 | 95 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of [Sealed] Letter To The Honorable Christopher J. Burke From David E. Moore Regarding Apple's Response To The Shaw's Response To The Court's Order To Show Cause filed by Apple, Inc..(Moore, David) (Entered: 05/30/2023) (2) |
| May 25, 2023 | 88 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of (1) Plaintiff's Second Set of Requests for Production to Defendant, (2) Plaintiff's Second Set of Interrogatories to Defendant, and (3) Plaintiff's First Set of Requests for Admissions to Defendant filed by ImmerVision, Inc..(Jones, Keith) (Entered: 05/25/2023) (3) |
| May 25, 2023 | 93 | [SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from David E. Moore regarding Apple's response to the Shaw's response to the Court's Order to Show Cause - re (108 in 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB) Response to Order, (109 in 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB, 86 in 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 84 in 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB) Oral Order,,,,, (85 in 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB) Response to Order, (83 in 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB) Response to Order. (Moore, David) (Entered: 05/25/2023) (0) |
| May 24, 2023 | 89 | RESPONSE to D.I. 86 Oral Order and Request for D.I. 85 to be unsealed filed by Steven M Shaw, Venson M Shaw. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Envelope)(mkr) (Entered: 05/25/2023) (0) |
| May 24, 2023 | 90 | (SEALED) Letter Motion to Judge Burke filed "IN CAMERA" requesting permission to Redact the Settlement Agreement filed by Venson Shaw and Steven Shaw with enclosed proposed redactions. (mkr) (Main Document 90 replaced on 5/26/2023) (dlb). Modified on 5/26/2023 (dlb). (Entered: 05/25/2023) (0) |
| May 23, 2023 | 87 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Apple Inc.'s Surreply Markman Brief filed by Apple, Inc..(Moore, David) (Entered: 05/23/2023) (2) |
| May 18, 2023 | 86 | ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed Venson Shaw and Steven Shaw's ("the Shaws") response to the Court's order to show cause ("Letter"), (Civil Action No. 21-1484-MN-CJB, D.I. 85; Civil Action No. 21-1570-MN-CJB, D.I. 83; Civil Action No. 21-1733-MN-CJB, D.I. 108), hereby ORDERS as follows: (1) Pursuant to the District of Delaware CM/ECF Procedure G, the Shaws shall file with the Court a redacted version of their Letter within 7 days after the filing of the original sealed document.; (2) By no later than May 25, 2023, Defendant Apple, Inc. shall file with the Court an answering letter brief, not to exceed three single-spaced pages, in no less than 12-point font, outlining its opposition to the Letter. By no later than June 1, 2023, the Shaws may file with the Court a reply letter brief, not to exceed one single-spaced page, in no less than 12-point font.; (3) By no later than June 1, 2023, Apple, Inc. shall file on behalf of both parties a one-page motion with respect to this issue.; and (4) The parties should consult and follow Judge Burke's "Guidelines for Discovery Disputes," which is found in the "Guidelines" tab on Judge Burke's portion of the District Court's website. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 5/18/2023. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB(dlb) (Entered: 05/18/2023) (0) |
| May 17, 2023 | 85 | [SEALED] Request to Seal and Letter RESPONSE to 81 Order to Show Cause filed by Venson M Shaw, Steven M Shaw. (dlb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/18/2023: # 1 Letter Response to Order, # 2 Mailing envelope) (dlb). Modified on 5/22/2023 (dlb) - Settlement and License Agreement enclosed "in Camera". (Entered: 05/18/2023) (0) |
| May 10, 2023 | 84 | REDACTED VERSION of (100 in 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB; D.I. 80 in 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB; D.I. 75 in 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB) Letter by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1-3)(Moore, David) Modified on 5/10/2023 (dlb). (Entered: 05/10/2023) (0) |
| May 5, 2023 | 82 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff ImmerVision, Inc.'s Claim Construction Reply Brief, and the Declaration of Daniel Reiley, Ph.D. in Support of ImmerVision's Claim Reply Brief filed by ImmerVision, Inc..(Jones, Keith) (Entered: 05/05/2023) (3) |
| May 5, 2023 | 83 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Order to Show Cause Regarding The Shaw License filed by Apple, Inc..(Palapura, Bindu) (Entered: 05/05/2023) (2) |
| May 4, 2023 | 81 | ORDER To Show Cause Regarding the Shaw License. Signed by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 5/4/23. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB(mlc) (Entered: 05/04/2023) (2) |
| May 3, 2023 | 79 | Joint STIPULATION To Extend Time to Serve Claim Construction Briefs by ImmerVision, Inc.. (Simmons, John) (Entered: 05/03/2023) (3) |
| May 3, 2023 | 80 | [SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from David E. Moore regarding Discovery Dispute, Request for Order to Show Cause. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1-3, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Moore, David) (Entered: 05/03/2023) (0) |
| Apr 20, 2023 | 78 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Apple Inc.'s Responsive Markman Brief filed by Apple, Inc..(Brown, Andrew) (Entered: 04/20/2023) (2) |
| Apr 14, 2023 | 77 | STIPULATION to extend time to serve claim construction briefs by Apple, Inc.. (Palapura, Bindu) (Entered: 04/14/2023) (3) |
| Apr 3, 2023 | 75 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Apple Inc.'s Production Of Documents (Bates APL-IMV_00026012 - APL-IMV_00048801) [Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only] filed by Apple, Inc..(Moore, David) (Entered: 04/03/2023) (2) |
| Apr 3, 2023 | 76 | NOTICE to Take Deposition of Dr. Daniel Reiley on April 12, 2023 filed by Apple, Inc..(Moore, David) (Entered: 04/03/2023) (2) |
| Mar 31, 2023 | 74 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff ImmerVision, Inc.'s production of documents marked IMV0007801 to IMV0043326 filed by ImmerVision, Inc..(Jones, Keith) (Entered: 03/31/2023) (2) |
| Mar 15, 2023 | 72 | ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' Joint Claim Construction Chart, (Civil Action No. 21-1733, D.I. 91; Civil Action No. 21-1570, D.I. 66; Civil Action No. 21-1484, D.I. 71), hereby ORDERS that any party relying on a construction of "plain and ordinary meaning" shall clearly articulate in its claim construction briefing what it contends is the plain and ordinary meaning. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 3/15/2023. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB(dlb) (Entered: 03/15/2023) (0) |
| Mar 15, 2023 | 73 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff's Opening Claim Construction Brief, Declaration of Daniel Reiley, Ph.D., and Exhibits marked A to L filed by ImmerVision, Inc..(Simmons, John) (Entered: 03/15/2023) (3) |
| Mar 13, 2023 | 71 | CLAIM Construction Chart by ImmerVision, Inc.. (Simmons, John) (Entered: 03/13/2023) (5) |
| Mar 9, 2023 | 69 | Joint Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from John D. Simmons and Bindu A. Palapura regarding Joint Request to Amend the Joint Claim Construction Chart filed on February 16, 2023. (Attachments: # 1 Amended Joint Claim Construction Chart)(Simmons, John) (Entered: 03/09/2023) (0) |
| Mar 9, 2023 | 70 | ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' March 9, 2023 letter, (Civil Action No. 21-1484-MN-CJB, D.I. 69; Civil Action No. 21-1570-MN-CJB, D.I. 64; Civil Action No. 21-1733-MN-CJB, D.I. 89), hereby ORDERS that by no later than March 13, 2023, the parties shall file their Amended Joint Claim Construction Chart separately on the docket.Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 3/9/2023. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB(dlb) (Entered: 03/09/2023) (0) |
| Mar 8, 2023 | 68 | NOTICE of Issuance of Amended Subpoena directed to Volpi Manufacturing U.S.A., Co., Inc. by Apple, Inc. (Moore, David) (Entered: 03/08/2023) (30) |
| Feb 27, 2023 | 67 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of (1) Plaintiff's Responses and Objections to Defendant's Second Set of Requests for Production, and (2) Plaintiff's Responses and Objections to Defendant's Third Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 11-12) filed by ImmerVision, Inc..(Jones, Keith) (Entered: 02/27/2023) (3) |
| Feb 23, 2023 | 66 | NOTICE of Issuance of Subpoena directed to Volpi Manufacturing U.S.A., Co., Inc. by Apple, Inc. (Moore, David) (Entered: 02/23/2023) (30) |
| Feb 16, 2023 | 65 | CLAIM Construction Chart by ImmerVision, Inc.. (Simmons, John) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/24/2023: # 1 Appendix) (dlb). (Entered: 02/16/2023) (0) |
| Feb 15, 2023 | 64 | Joint STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to File Joint Claim Construction Chart to 2/16/2023 - filed by ImmerVision, Inc.. (Simmons, John) (Entered: 02/15/2023) (2) |
| Jan 27, 2023 | 63 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Apple Inc.'s Second Set of Requests for Production to Plaintiff ImmerVision, Inc. (Nos. 69-74), and Defendant Apple Inc.'s Third Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff ImmerVision, Inc. (Nos. 11-12) filed by Apple, Inc..(Moore, David) (Entered: 01/27/2023) (2) |
| Jan 26, 2023 | 62 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Apple Inc.'s Identification of Proposed Claim Constructions filed by Apple, Inc..(Moore, David) (Entered: 01/26/2023) (2) |
| Jan 25, 2023 | 61 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff's Proposed Claim Constructions filed by ImmerVision, Inc..(Jones, Keith) (Entered: 01/25/2023) (2) |
| Jan 12, 2023 | 59 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Apple Inc.'s Identification of Claim Terms for Construction filed by Apple, Inc..(Moore, David) (Entered: 01/12/2023) (2) |
| Jan 12, 2023 | 60 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff ImmerVision, Inc.'s Identification of Claim Terms for Construction filed by ImmerVision, Inc..(Jones, Keith) (Entered: 01/12/2023) (2) |
| Dec 27, 2022 | 58 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff's Production of Documents marked IMV0002127 to IMV0007800 filed by ImmerVision, Inc..(Jones, Keith) (Entered: 12/27/2022) (2) |
| Dec 18, 2022 | 57 | Joint STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME Claim Construction Issue Identification to 1/11/2023 - filed by ImmerVision, Inc.. (Simmons, John) (Entered: 12/18/2022) (2) |
| Dec 16, 2022 | 56 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Apple Inc.'s Responses and Objections to Plaintiff ImmerVision, Inc.'s First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-5) (Supplemental Response to Interrogatory No. 5) [Highly Confidential-Attorneys' Eyes Only] filed by Apple, Inc..(Moore, David) (Entered: 12/16/2022) (2) |
| Dec 9, 2022 | 55 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Apple Inc.'s Invalidity Contentions, Corresponding Exhibits, and Production of Documents filed by Apple, Inc..(Moore, David) (Entered: 12/09/2022) (2) |
| Nov 3, 2022 | 54 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Apple Inc.'s Responses And Objections To Plaintiff ImmerVision, Inc.'s First Set Of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-5) [Highly Confidential-Attorneys' Eyes Only] filed by Apple, Inc..(Palapura, Bindu) |
| Nov 2, 2022 | 52 | Notice of Appearance (1) Docket Text: NOTICE of Appearance by Keith A. Jones on behalf of ImmerVision, Inc. (Jones, Keith) |
| Nov 2, 2022 | 53 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff's Initial Infringement Contentions filed by ImmerVision, Inc..(Simmons, John) |
| Oct 20, 2022 | 51 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff's Production of Documents marked IMV0002093 to IMV0002126 satisfying the October 4, 2022 Order to Show Cause filed by ImmerVision, Inc..(Simmons, John) |
| Oct 19, 2022 | N/A | Add Attorneys Pro Hac Vice (0) Docket Text: Pro Hac Vice Attorney Karina N. Pundeff,Kenneth A. Kuwayti for Apple, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (apk) |
| Oct 13, 2022 | N/A | SO ORDERED (0) Docket Text: SO ORDERED D.I. [50] MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Kenneth A. Kuwayti and Karina N. Pundeff of Morrison & Foerster LLP filed by Apple, Inc. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 10/13/2022. (smg) |
| Oct 11, 2022 | 50 | Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (3) Docket Text: MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Kenneth A. Kuwayti and Karina N. Pundeff of Morrison & Foerster LLP - filed by Apple, Inc.. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Palapura, Bindu) |
| Oct 4, 2022 | 47 | Letter (Main Document) (2) Docket Text: Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from John D. Simmons regarding a request for a court order directing the production of a prior settlement agreement. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order)(Simmons, John) |
| Oct 4, 2022 | 47 | Letter (Text of Proposed Order) (2) Docket Text: Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from John D. Simmons regarding a request for a court order directing the production of a prior settlement agreement. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order)(Simmons, John) |
| Oct 4, 2022 | 48 | Order to Show Cause (2) Docket Text: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Within ten days of this Order, Vivotek Inc.,Vivotek USA Inc., and Vivotek Holdings Inc. shall show cause why the settlement agreement between them and ImmerVision, Inc., dated September 2013, shall not be produced in this litigation under the HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY designation of the Protective Order governing this case. Plaintiff shall provide a copy of this Order to Vivotek Inc. within three days of this Order. If no objection is filed to this Order by Vivotek Inc., Vivotek USA Inc., or Vivotek Holdings Inc. within ten days of this Order, under the HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY designation of the Protective Order governing this case. Signed by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 10/4/2022. (apk) |
| Oct 4, 2022 | 49 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendants' Production of Core Technical Documents filed by Apple, Inc..(Harper, Brandon) |
| Oct 3, 2022 | 46 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories to Defendant filed by ImmerVision, Inc..(Simmons, John) |
| Sep 30, 2022 | 45 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff ImmerVision, Inc.'s Responses and Objections to Defendant Apple, Inc.'s Second Set of Interrogatories (No. 10) filed by ImmerVision, Inc..(Simmons, John) |
| Sep 20, 2022 | 44 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of (1) Plaintiff's Supplemental Disclosures Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1)(A), (2) Plaintiff's Responses and Objections to Defendant Apple, Inc.'s First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-9), and (3) Plaintiff's Responses and Objections to Defendant Apple, Inc.'s First Set of Requests for Production (Nos. 1-68) filed by ImmerVision, Inc..(Simmons, John) |
| Sep 19, 2022 | 43 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff's Supplemental Identification of Accused Products, Asserted Patents, Damages Model, and Prosecution File History filed by ImmerVision, Inc..(Simmons, John) |
| Aug 31, 2022 | 42 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Apple Inc.'s Second Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff ImmerVision, Inc. (No. 10) filed by Apple, Inc..(Harper, Brandon) |
| Aug 30, 2022 | 41 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Notice of Service filed by ImmerVision, Inc..(Simmons, John) |
| Aug 26, 2022 | 39 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Apple Inc.'s Responses to Plaintiff ImmerVision, Inc.'s First Set of Requests for Production (Nos. 1-38) filed by Apple, Inc..(Palapura, Bindu) |
| Aug 26, 2022 | 40 | Protective Order (25) Docket Text: PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 8/26/2022. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB(mlc) |
| Aug 25, 2022 | 38 | Proposed Order (25) Docket Text: Joint PROPOSED ORDER (Protective Order) by Apple, Inc.. (Harper, Brandon) |
| Aug 18, 2022 | N/A | SO ORDERED (0) Docket Text: SO ORDERED D.I. [37] STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for the parties to submit a joint Protective Order to August 25, 2022 filed by Apple, Inc. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 8/18/2022. (dlb) |
| Aug 18, 2022 | 36 | Proposed Order (9) Docket Text: PROPOSED ORDER Stipulated Discovery Order by ImmerVision, Inc.. (Simmons, John) |
| Aug 18, 2022 | 37 | Stipulation to EXTEND Time (2) Docket Text: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for the parties to submit a joint Protective Order to August 25, 2022 - filed by Apple, Inc.. (Harper, Brandon) |
| Aug 16, 2022 | 35 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of (1) Plaintiff's Disclosures Pursuant to 7.b of the Scheduling Order - The Identification of Accused Products, Asserted Patents, Damages Model, and Prosecution File History, and (2) Plaintiff's Production of Documents marked IMV0000001 to IMV0000546 filed by ImmerVision, Inc..(Simmons, John) |
| Aug 15, 2022 | N/A | SO ORDERED (0) Docket Text: SO ORDERED D.I. (29 in 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB) (54 in 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB), (34 in 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB) STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for the Plaintiff to Comply with Paragraph 7.a of the June 21, 2022 Scheduling Order to August 29, 2022 filed by ImmerVision, Inc. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 8/15/2022. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB(dlb) |
| Aug 12, 2022 | 34 | Stipulation to EXTEND Time (2) Docket Text: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for the Plaintiff to Comply with Paragraph 7.a of the June 21, 2022 Scheduling Order to August 29, 2022 - filed by ImmerVision, Inc.. (Simmons, John) |
| Aug 8, 2022 | N/A | SO ORDERED (0) Docket Text: SO ORDERED D.I. (27 in 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB, 32 in 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 52 in 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB) STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for the parties to submit a joint Protective Order and Discovery Order to August 18, 2022 filed by Apple, Inc.. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 8/5/2022. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB(dlb) |
| Aug 5, 2022 | 33 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Apple Inc.'s First Set Of Interrogatories To Plaintiff Immervision, Inc. (Nos. 1-9); and Defendant Apple Inc.'s First Set Of Requests For Production To Plaintiff Immervision, Inc. (Nos. 1-68) filed by Apple, Inc..(Harper, Brandon) |
| Aug 4, 2022 | 32 | Stipulation to EXTEND Time (2) Docket Text: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for the parties to submit a joint Protective Order and Discovery Order to August 18, 2022 - filed by Apple, Inc.. (Palapura, Bindu) |
| Jul 27, 2022 | 31 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff's First Set of Requests for Production to Defendant filed by ImmerVision, Inc..(Simmons, John) |
| Jul 21, 2022 | N/A | SO ORDERED (0) Docket Text: SO ORDERED (47 in 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB, 28 in 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 23 in 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB) STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for the parties to submit a joint Protective Order and Discovery Order to August 4, 2022 filed by Apple, Inc. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 7/20/2022. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB(dlb) |
| Jul 21, 2022 | 29 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1)(A) filed by ImmerVision, Inc..(Simmons, John) |
| Jul 21, 2022 | 30 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Apple Inc.'s Initial Disclosures filed by Apple, Inc..(Moore, David) |
| Jul 20, 2022 | 28 | Stipulation to EXTEND Time (2) Docket Text: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for the parties to submit a joint Protective Order and Discovery Order to August 4, 2022 - filed by Apple, Inc.. (Harper, Brandon) |
| Jun 21, 2022 | 26 | Scheduling Order (20) Docket Text: SCHEDULING ORDER: Joinder of Parties due by 5/22/2023. Amended Pleadings due by 5/22/2023. Discovery due by 12/15/2023. Opening Expert Reports due by 1/26/2024. Rebuttal Expert Reports due by 2/26/2024. Claim Construction Opening Brief due by 3/15/2023. Claim Construction Answering Brief due by 4/17/2023. Claim Construction Reply Brief due by 5/1/2023. A Markman Hearing is set for 7/27/2023 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 2A before Judge Christopher J. Burke. A Pretrial Conference is set for 10/21/2024 at 04:30 PM in Courtroom 4A before Judge Maryellen Noreika. A 7 day Jury Trial is set for 10/28/2024 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 4A before Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please see Order for further details and deadlines. Signed by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 6/21/2022. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB(dlb) |
| Jun 21, 2022 | N/A | Oral Order (0) Docket Text: ORAL ORDER: With the parties having no disputes as to the form of the proposed Scheduling Order (D.I. 41 in 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB, 26 in 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 21 in 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB), the Court has today entered that Order. To the extent that either party wishes the Court to schedule an in-person or telephonic Case Management Conference at this time, they should so inform the Court by letter. To the extent that the parties do not do so, the Court will not set a conference at this time. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 6/21/2022. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB(dlb) |
| Jun 15, 2022 | 24 | Proposed Order (20) Docket Text: Joint PROPOSED ORDER Scheduling Order by Apple, Inc.. (Moore, David) |
| Jun 15, 2022 | 25 | Letter (Main Document) (3) Docket Text: Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from David E. Moore regarding case summary pursuant to the Court's Order of April 18, 2022 - re (19 in 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB, 24 in 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 39 in 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB) Proposed Order. (Attachments: # (1) Checklist)(Moore, David) |
| Jun 15, 2022 | 25 | Letter (Checklist) (3) Docket Text: Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from David E. Moore regarding case summary pursuant to the Court's Order of April 18, 2022 - re (19 in 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB, 24 in 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 39 in 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB) Proposed Order. (Attachments: # (1) Checklist)(Moore, David) |
| Jun 2, 2022 | N/A | SO ORDERED (0) Docket Text: SO ORDERED D.I. (18 in 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB, 37 in 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB, 23 in 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB) STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for the parties' to submit a joint proposed Scheduling Order and case-management letter to June 15, 2022 filed by Apple, Inc. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 6/2/2022. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB(dlb) |
| Jun 1, 2022 | 23 | Stipulation to EXTEND Time (2) Docket Text: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for the parties' to submit a joint proposed Scheduling Order and case-management letter to June 15, 2022 - filed by Apple, Inc.. (Palapura, Bindu) |
| May 12, 2022 | 22 | Answer to Amended Complaint (6) Docket Text: ANSWER to Amended Complaint, re: [20] Amended Complaint with Jury Demand by Apple, Inc..(Moore, David) |
| Apr 28, 2022 | 20 | Amended Complaint* (1) |
| Apr 28, 2022 | N/A | SO ORDERED (0) Docket Text: SO ORDERED D.I. (21 in 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB) Stipulation filed by ImmerVision, Inc., (17 in 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB) Stipulation filed by ImmerVision, Inc., (31 in 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB) Stipulation filed by ImmerVision, Inc. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 4/28/2022. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB(dlb) |
| Apr 28, 2022 | 20 | Amended Complaint (Main Document) (5) Docket Text: AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc.- filed by ImmerVision, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit C)(Simmons, John) |
| Apr 28, 2022 | 20 | Amended Complaint (Exhibit A) (27) Docket Text: AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc.- filed by ImmerVision, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit C)(Simmons, John) |
| Apr 28, 2022 | 20 | Amended Complaint (Exhibit B) (5) Docket Text: AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc.- filed by ImmerVision, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit C)(Simmons, John) |
| Apr 28, 2022 | 20 | Amended Complaint (Exhibit C) (19) Docket Text: AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc.- filed by ImmerVision, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit C)(Simmons, John) |
| Apr 28, 2022 | 21 | Stipulation (3) Docket Text: STIPULATION and (Proposed) Order to Extend Time by ImmerVision, Inc.. (Simmons, John) |
| Apr 18, 2022 | N/A | Oral Order (0) Docket Text: ORAL ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer and discuss, in person and/or by telephone, each of the matters listed on Judge Burke's Case Management Checklist ("Checklist"). Within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the parties shall jointly file a proposed Scheduling Order, which is consistent with Judge Burke's "Rule 16 Scheduling Order Patent" up through and including paragraph number 16 (i.e., regarding the portions of the case schedule leading up to but not including the case dispositive motion stage of the case) and that is consistent with paragraphs 15-22 of Judge Noreika's "Patent Scheduling Order - Non-ANDA" (i.e., regarding the portions of the case schedule from the case dispositive motion stage through post-trial motions); and (ii) a letter, not to exceed three pages, that contains the following: (a) a description of what this case is about; (b) the parties positions regarding any disputes in the proposed Scheduling Order; and (c) a list of the three most significant topics (other than Scheduling Order disputes) discussed during the parties' review of the Checklist items, along with a brief description as to what was discussed as to those topics. Thereafter, the Court may schedule a Case Management Conference/Rule 16 Scheduling Conference to be held with Judge Burke. The Checklist and both Scheduling Orders can be found on Judge Burke's/Judge Noreika's portions of the District Court's website.. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 4/18/2022. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB(dlb) |
| Apr 14, 2022 | N/A | Motions Referred (0) Docket Text: MOTION REFERRED: [16] MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Motion referred to Christopher J. Burke.(dlb) |
| Apr 14, 2022 | 16 | Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Main Document) (1) Docket Text: MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order)(Moore, David) |
| Apr 14, 2022 | 16 | Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Text of Proposed Order) (1) Docket Text: MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order)(Moore, David) |
| Apr 14, 2022 | 17 | Opening Brief in Support (9) Docket Text: OPENING BRIEF in Support re [16] MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Apple, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 4/28/2022. (Moore, David) |
| Apr 14, 2022 | 18 | Disclosure Statement (1) Docket Text: Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Apple, Inc.. (Moore, David) |
| Apr 7, 2022 | N/A | Add Attorneys Pro Hac Vice (0) Docket Text: Pro Hac Vice Attorney Jennifer M Hartjes for Apple, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb) |
| Apr 6, 2022 | N/A | Add Attorneys Pro Hac Vice (0) Docket Text: Pro Hac Vice Attorney Shaun Zhang, Michael T. Pieja, Jennifer M Hartjes, and Doug Winnard for Apple, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb) |
| Apr 5, 2022 | N/A | SO ORDERED (0) Docket Text: SO ORDERED D.I. (12 in 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB) MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Michael T. Pieja, Doug Winnard, Shaun Zhang and Jennifer M. Hartjes of Goldman Ismail Tomaselli Brennan & Baum LLP filed by Apple, Inc.. Signed by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 4/5/2022. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB(dlb) |
| Mar 25, 2022 | N/A | SO ORDERED (0) Docket Text: SO ORDERED D.I. (13 in 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB, 15 in 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB) STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaints to April 14, 2022 filed by Apple, Inc. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 3/25/2022. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB(mlc) |
| Mar 24, 2022 | 14 | Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (5) Docket Text: MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Michael T. Pieja, Doug Winnard, Shaun Zhang and Jennifer M. Hartjes of Goldman Ismail Tomaselli Brennan & Baum LLP - filed by Apple, Inc.. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Palapura, Bindu) |
| Mar 24, 2022 | 15 | Stipulation to EXTEND Time (2) Docket Text: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaints to April 14, 2022 - filed by Apple, Inc.. (Moore, David) |
| Feb 22, 2022 | N/A | SO ORDERED (0) Docket Text: SO ORDERED D.I. [13] STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to March 25, 2022 filed by Apple, Inc.Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 2/2/2022. (dlb) |
| Feb 18, 2022 | 13 | Stipulation to EXTEND Time (2) Docket Text: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to March 25, 2022 - filed by Apple, Inc.. (Moore, David) |
| Feb 16, 2022 | N/A | SO ORDERED (0) Docket Text: SO ORDERED D.I. (8 in 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB) MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Keith A. Jones filed by ImmerVision, Inc.,D.I. (8 in 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB) MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Keith A. Jones filed by ImmerVision, Inc.,and D.I. (14 in 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB) MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Keith A. Jones filed by ImmerVision, Inc. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 2/16/2022. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01570-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB(dlb) |
| Feb 16, 2022 | N/A | Add Attorneys Pro Hac Vice (0) Docket Text: Pro Hac Vice Attorney Keith A. Jones for ImmerVision, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (apk) |
| Feb 15, 2022 | 11 | Notice of Appearance (2) Docket Text: NOTICE of Appearance by Bindu Ann George Palapura on behalf of Apple, Inc. (Palapura, Bindu) |
| Feb 15, 2022 | 12 | Notice of Appearance (2) Docket Text: NOTICE of Appearance by Brandon Ryan Harper on behalf of Apple, Inc. (Harper, Brandon) |
| Feb 10, 2022 | 9 | Stipulation (3) Docket Text: STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order Staying Case Pending Resolution of Disputes in Related Actions by Apple, Inc.. (Palapura, Bindu) |
| Feb 10, 2022 | N/A | Oral Order (0) Docket Text: ORAL ORDER: The Court has reviewed the parties' proposed stipulation requesting a stay pending the resolution of disputes in certain related actions, (D.I. 9 in Civil Action No. 21-1481-MN-CJB; D.I. 15 in Civil Action No. 21-1733-MN-CJB). After conferring with the District Judge, and in light of the District Judge's related order denying a stay request in those related cases, (D.I. 154 in Civil Action No. 18-1630-MN-CJB; D.I. 152 in Civil Action No. 18-1631-MN-CJB), the Court hereby ORDERS that the proposed stipulation is DENIED. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 2/10/2022. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01484-MN-CJB, 1:21-cv-01733-MN-CJB(dlb) |
| Feb 9, 2022 | 8 | Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (3) Docket Text: MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Keith A. Jones - filed by ImmerVision, Inc.. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Simmons, John) |
| Feb 3, 2022 | N/A | SO ORDERED (0) Docket Text: SO ORDERED D.I. [7] STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to March 10, 2022 filed by Apple, Inc. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 2/3/2022. (dlb) |
| Feb 3, 2022 | 7 | Stipulation to EXTEND Time (2) Docket Text: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to March 10, 2022 - filed by Apple, Inc.. (Moore, David) |
| Jan 18, 2022 | 6 | Return of Service Executed (2) Docket Text: Return of Service Executed by ImmerVision, Inc.. Apple, Inc. served on 1/18/2022, answer due 2/8/2022. (Simmons, John) |
| Oct 28, 2021 | N/A | Remark re Newer Attorneys (0) Docket Text: REMARK: The parties should be aware that the Court encourages the participation of newer attorneys in courtroom proceedings and at oral argument. Please see the Court's Standing Order Regarding Courtroom Opportunities for Newer Attorneys, a link to which is provided here for the parties' convenience:http://www.ded.uscourts.gov/sites/ded/files/forms/StandingOrder2017.pdf (dlb) |
| Oct 28, 2021 | N/A | Remark (0) Docket Text: Remark: The parties should follow the Court's Standing Order Regarding Courtesy Copies, a copy of which is found on Judge Burkes portion of the District Courts webpage: https://www.ded.uscourts.gov/judge/magistrate-judge-christopher-j-burke (dlb) |
| Oct 28, 2021 | N/A | Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge (0) Docket Text: ORAL ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Christopher J. Burke - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher J. Burke to hear and resolve all pre-trial matters up to and including expert discovery matters (but not including summary judgment motions, Daubert motions, pre-trial motions in limine or the pre-trial conference), subject to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and any further Order of the Court. All subsequent filings in this action shall be captioned as follows: Civil Action No. 21-1484-MN-CJB. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 10/28/2021. (dlw) |
| Oct 27, 2021 | N/A | Case Assigned/Reassigned (0) Docket Text: Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Oct 22, 2021 | 1 | Complaint* (1) |
| Oct 22, 2021 | N/A | No Summons Issued (0) Docket Text: No Summons Issued. (smg) |
| Oct 22, 2021 | 1 | Complaint (Main Document) (5) Docket Text: COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Apple, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3727431.) - filed by ImmerVision, Inc. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Civil Cover Sheet)(smg) |
| Oct 22, 2021 | 1 | Complaint (Exhibit A) (28) Docket Text: COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Apple, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3727431.) - filed by ImmerVision, Inc. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Civil Cover Sheet)(smg) |
| Oct 22, 2021 | 1 | Complaint (Civil Cover Sheet) (1) Docket Text: COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Apple, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3727431.) - filed by ImmerVision, Inc. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Civil Cover Sheet)(smg) |
| Oct 22, 2021 | 2 | Magistrate Consent Forms (3) Docket Text: Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (smg) |
| Oct 22, 2021 | 3 | Patent/Trademark Report to Commissioner (1) Docket Text: Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 6,844,990 B2. (smg) |
| Oct 22, 2021 | 4 | Disclosure Statement (1) Docket Text: Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by ImmerVision, Inc. (smg) |
