Case number 2019-1342
Kingston Technology Company v. SPEX Technologies, Inc. > Documents
| Date Field | Doc. No. | Description (Pages) |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2019 | 23 | Mandate issued to the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [652163] [JAB] [Entered: 11/25/2019 02:44 PM] (0) |
| Nov 18, 2019 | 22 | ORDER filed denying [16] petition for panel rehearing, petition for en banc rehearing filed by Kingston Technology Company, Inc. By: En Banc (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [649929] [JAB] [Entered: 11/18/2019 10:12 AM] (0) |
| Nov 7, 2019 | 21 | 18 paper copies of the response [19] received from Appellee SPEX Technologies, Inc. [647743] [JAB] [Entered: 11/07/2019 01:11 PM] (0) |
| Nov 6, 2019 | 20 | Notice to counsel for Appellee SPEX Technologies, Inc.: The record of this case indicates that the paper copies of response to rehearing petition (see Fed. Cir. R. 35(c)(4)) have not been filed. The paper copies must be filed promptly. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [647257] [JAB] [Entered: 11/06/2019 11:23 AM] (0) |
| Oct 31, 2019 | 19 | RESPONSE of Appellee SPEX Technologies, Inc. to the petition for panel rehearing [16] filed by Appellant Kingston Technology Company, Inc., petition for en banc rehearing [16] filed by Appellant Kingston Technology Company, Inc.. Service: 10/31/2019 by email. [646167] [19-1342] [Benjamin Wang] [Entered: 10/31/2019 02:35 PM] (0) |
| Oct 17, 2019 | 18 | The court invites a response from Appellee SPEX Technologies, Inc. to the petition for panel rehearing, petition for en banc rehearing filed by Appellant in 19-1342. The response is due on or before 10/31/2019. [642887] [JAB] [Entered: 10/17/2019 01:08 PM] (0) |
| Sep 20, 2019 | 17 | 18 paper copies of the petition for panel rehearing [16], petition for en banc rehearing [16] received from Appellant Kingston Technology Company, Inc. [636959] [JAB] [Entered: 09/20/2019 09:32 AM] (0) |
| Sep 18, 2019 | 16 | Petition for panel rehearing, for en banc rehearing filed by Appellant Kingston Technology Company, Inc.. Service: 09/18/2019 by email. The paper copies of the petition must be filed within two business days (see Fed. Cir. R. 35(c)(4).The required paper copies should be received by the court on or before 09/20/2019 [636560] [19-1342] [Oliver Richards] [Entered: 09/18/2019 05:31 PM] (0) |
| Aug 5, 2019 | 15 | ORDER filed granting motion to extend time to file petition for rehearing/en banc [14] filed by Appellant Kingston Technology Company, Inc. (Per Curiam). Service: 08/05/2019 by clerk. [625949] [LMS] [Entered: 08/05/2019 11:34 AM] (0) |
| Aug 1, 2019 | 14 | MOTION of Appellant Kingston Technology Company, Inc. to extend the time to file a Combined Petition for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc until 09/18/2019 [Consent: unopposed]. Service: 08/01/2019 by email. [625287] [19-1342] [Oliver Richards] [Entered: 08/01/2019 01:45 PM] (0) |
| Jul 19, 2019 | 12 | ORDER filed. The stay of the briefing schedule in these appeals is lifted. The official caption for Appeal No. 2019-1599 has been revised to reflect that the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office has intervened in that appeal. The appeals are dismissed, and all pending motions [596626-2] are denied. Kingston shall bear costs. Service: 07/19/2019 by clerk. [622129] [19-1342, 19-1599] [LMS] [Entered: 07/19/2019 09:39 AM] (8) |
| Jul 19, 2019 | 13 | JUDGMENT. DISMISSED. Court Order. COSTS: Costs taxed against Appellant(s). Mandate to issue in due course. For information regarding costs, petitions for rehearing, and petitions for writs of certiorari click here. [622188] [JAB] [Entered: 07/19/2019 12:26 PM] (1) |
| Mar 4, 2019 | 11 | REPLY of Appellee SPEX Technologies, Inc. to response filed by Appellant, Doc. No [9]. Service: 03/04/2019 by email. [590219] [19-1342] [Benjamin Wang] [Entered: 03/04/2019 10:35 PM] (11) |
| Feb 27, 2019 | 10 | Notice from the United States Patent and Trademark Office of non-filing of the certified list. [589033] [TAM] [Entered: 02/27/2019 11:50 AM] (4) |
| Feb 19, 2019 | 9 | RESPONSE of Appellant Kingston Technology Company, Inc. to the court order [6] , court order [6]. Service: 02/19/2019 by email. [587245] [19-1342] [Oliver Richards] [Entered: 02/19/2019 07:42 PM] (142) |
| Jan 18, 2019 | 7 | Entry of appearance for BENJAMIN T. WANG as of counsel for Appellee SPEX Technologies, Inc.. Service: 01/18/2019 by email. [579480] [19-1342] [Benjamin Wang] [Entered: 01/18/2019 08:09 PM] (2) |
| Jan 18, 2019 | 8 | Entry of appearance for MARC A. FENSTER as principal counsel for Appellee SPEX Technologies, Inc. Service: 01/18/2019 by email. [579481] [19-1342] --[Edited 01/28/2019 by MMA to revise docket text] [Marc Fenster] [Entered: 01/18/2019 08:13 PM] (2) |
| Jan 17, 2019 | 6 | ORDER filed. Kingston is directed to show cause, within 30 days of the date of filing of this order, why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See 35 U.S.C. § 314(d) (“The determination by the Director whether to institute an inter partes review under this section shall be final and nonappealable.”); 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(4)(A); see also Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC v. Lee, 136 S. Ct. 2131, 2140 (2016) (“the agency’s decision to deny a petition [for inter partes review] is a matter committed to the Patent Office’s discretion”); St. Jude Med., Cardiology Div., Inc. v. Volcano Corp., 749 F.3d 1373, 1375 (Fed. Cir. 2014). SPEX Technologies, Inc. may respond within 14 days thereafter. The briefing schedule is stayed. (Per Curiam). Service: 01/17/2019 by clerk. [578837] [LMS] [Entered: 01/17/2019 09:48 AM] (2) |
| Jan 9, 2019 | 2 | Certificate of Interest for the Appellant Kingston Technology Company, Inc.. Service: 01/09/2019 by email. [577125] [19-1342] [David Hoffman] [Entered: 01/09/2019 05:24 PM] (3) |
| Jan 9, 2019 | 3 | Docketing Statement for the Appellant Kingston Technology Company, Inc.. Service: 01/09/2019 by email. [577127] [19-1342] [David Hoffman] [Entered: 01/09/2019 05:25 PM] (3) |
| Jan 9, 2019 | 4 | Entry of appearance for David M. Hoffman as principal counsel for Appellant Kingston Technology Company, Inc.. Service: 01/09/2019 by email. [577132] [19-1342] [David Hoffman] [Entered: 01/09/2019 05:32 PM] (1) |
| Jan 9, 2019 | 5 | Entry of appearance for Oliver J. Richards as of counsel for Appellant Kingston Technology Company, Inc. Service: 01/09/2019 by email. [577133] [19-1342] --[Edited 01/28/2019 by MMA to revise docket text] [Oliver Richards] [Entered: 01/09/2019 05:34 PM] (1) |
| Dec 26, 2018 | 1 | Appeal docketed. Received: 12/20/2018. [574447] Entry of Appearance due 01/09/2019. Certificate of Interest is due on 01/09/2019. Docketing Statement due 01/09/2019. Certified List due on 02/04/2019. [TAM] [Entered: 12/26/2018 01:02 PM] (16) |
