Case number 1:21-cv-01026
Lazer IP LLC v. Microchip Technology Incorporated > Documents
| Date Field | Doc. No. | Description (Pages) |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2022 | 27 | Patent/Trademark Report to Commissioner (Order) (2) Docket Text: Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,701,508. (Attachments: # (1) Order)(nms) |
| Aug 25, 2022 | 27 | Patent/Trademark Report to Commissioner (Main Document) (1) Docket Text: Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,701,508. (Attachments: # (1) Order)(nms) |
| Aug 24, 2022 | 26 | Order (2) Docket Text: SO ORDERED Granting [25] Stipulation of Dismissal (***Civil Case Terminated). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/24/2022. (nms) |
| Aug 24, 2022 | 25 | Stipulation of Dismissal (2) Docket Text: STIPULATION of Dismissal by Lazer IP LLC. (Pazuniak, George) |
| Aug 18, 2022 | 24 | Order (1) Docket Text: SO ORDERED Granting [23] Stipulation to Stay Pending Settlement. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/18/2022. (nms) |
| Aug 17, 2022 | 23 | Stipulation (1) Docket Text: STIPULATION to Stay Pending Settlement by Microchip Technology Incorporated. (Farnan, Kelly) |
| Jun 2, 2022 | 22 | Memorandum and Order (8) Docket Text: MEMORANDUM ORDER: Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings (D.I. [18]) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 6/2/2022. (nms) |
| Apr 4, 2022 | N/A | Case No Longer Referred to Mediation (0) Docket Text: CASE NO LONGER REFERRED to Chief Magistrate Judge Thynge for the purpose of exploring ADR. Pursuant to the Court's Standing Order No. 2022-2, dated March 14, 2022, "[u]nless otherwise directed by the Court, Magistrate Judges will no longer engage in alternative dispute resolution of patent and securities cases." See also 28 U.S.C. § 652(b). (Taylor, Daniel) |
| Mar 10, 2022 | 21 | Reply Brief (5) Docket Text: REPLY BRIEF re [18] MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings of Invalidity as to the 6,701,508 Patent filed by Microchip Technology Incorporated. (Farnan, Kelly) |
| Mar 3, 2022 | 20 | Answering Brief in Opposition (Exhibit 3 - Dictionary) (2) Docket Text: ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re [18] MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings of Invalidity as to the 6,701,508 Patent, filed by Lazer IP LLC.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 3/10/2022. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3)(Pazuniak, George) Modified on 3/3/2022 (nms). |
| Mar 3, 2022 | 20 | Answering Brief in Opposition (Exhibit 2 - Prosecution History) (30) Docket Text: ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re [18] MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings of Invalidity as to the 6,701,508 Patent, filed by Lazer IP LLC.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 3/10/2022. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3)(Pazuniak, George) Modified on 3/3/2022 (nms). |
| Mar 3, 2022 | 20 | Answering Brief in Opposition (Exhibit 1 -'508 Patent) (18) Docket Text: ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re [18] MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings of Invalidity as to the 6,701,508 Patent, filed by Lazer IP LLC.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 3/10/2022. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3)(Pazuniak, George) Modified on 3/3/2022 (nms). |
| Mar 3, 2022 | 20 | Answering Brief in Opposition (Main Document) (30) Docket Text: ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re [18] MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings of Invalidity as to the 6,701,508 Patent, filed by Lazer IP LLC.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 3/10/2022. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3)(Pazuniak, George) Modified on 3/3/2022 (nms). |
| Feb 17, 2022 | 19 | Opening Brief in Support (Exhibit 1) (19) Docket Text: OPENING BRIEF in Support re [18] MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings of Invalidity as to the 6,701,508 Patent, filed by Microchip Technology Incorporated.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 3/3/2022. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1)(Farnan, Kelly) Modified on 2/18/2022 (nms). Modified on 2/18/2022 (nms). |
| Feb 17, 2022 | 19 | Opening Brief in Support (Main Document) (20) Docket Text: OPENING BRIEF in Support re [18] MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings of Invalidity as to the 6,701,508 Patent, filed by Microchip Technology Incorporated.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 3/3/2022. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1)(Farnan, Kelly) Modified on 2/18/2022 (nms). Modified on 2/18/2022 (nms). |
| Feb 17, 2022 | 18 | Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order) (1) Docket Text: MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings of Invalidity as to the 6,701,508 Patent - filed by Microchip Technology Incorporated. (Attachments: # (1) Proposed Order)(Farnan, Kelly) Modified on 2/17/2022 (nms). |
| Feb 17, 2022 | 18 | Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Main Document) (1) Docket Text: MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings of Invalidity as to the 6,701,508 Patent - filed by Microchip Technology Incorporated. (Attachments: # (1) Proposed Order)(Farnan, Kelly) Modified on 2/17/2022 (nms). |
| Nov 2, 2021 | 17 | Notice of Service (1) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Microchip Technology Incorporateds Initial Disclosures Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a) filed by Microchip Technology Incorporated.(Farnan, Kelly) |
| Oct 27, 2021 | N/A | Oral Order (0) Docket Text: ORAL ORDER: A Motion for Teleconference to Resolve Discovery Dispute should be filed if counsel finds they are unable to resolve a discovery matter. The suggested text for this motion can be found in Judge Hall's portion of the Court's website, in the "Forms" tab, under the heading "Motion for Teleconference to Resolve Discovery/Protective Order Disputes." The dispute will thereafter be addressed in accordance with Judge Hall's discovery dispute procedures. ORDERED by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 10/27/2021. (ceg) |
| Oct 26, 2021 | N/A | Oral Order (0) Docket Text: ORAL ORDER: This matter has been referred to Chief Magistrate Judge Mary Pat Thynge for ADR. Should any party (or all parties) desire to discuss mediation and its timing, the party(ies) shall contact Judge Thynge and her Law Clerk, Daniel Taylor (daniel_taylor@ded.uscourts.gov), to request that a teleconference be scheduled. Ordered by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 10/26/2021. (Taylor, Daniel) |
| Oct 26, 2021 | N/A | Case Referred to Mediation (0) Docket Text: CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Mary Pat Thynge for Mediation. Please see Standing Order dated January 20, 2016, regarding disclosure of confidential ADR communications. A link to the standing order is provided here for your convenience at https://www.ded.uscourts.gov/sites/ded/files/forms/StandingOrderforADR-Mediation.pdf (Taylor, Daniel) |
| Oct 26, 2021 | N/A | Case Referred to Magistrate Judge (0) Docket Text: CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Hall to handle all discovery disputes including any that arise in connection with expert reports. (nms) |
| Oct 25, 2021 | 14 | Scheduling Order (11) Docket Text: SCHEDULING ORDER: Case referred to the Magistrate Judge for the purpose of exploring ADR. The case will be referred to a magistrate judge to handle all discovery disputes. Joinder of Parties due by 5/5/2022. Amended Pleadings due by 5/5/2022. Discovery due by 12/8/2022. Dispositive Motions due by 4/20/2023. Joint Claim Construction Brief due by 8/31/2022. A Markman Hearing is set for 9/22/2022, at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 6A. A Pretrial Conference is set for 8/25/2023, at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 6A. A 5 day Jury Trial is set to start 9/18/2023, at 9:30 AM in Courtroom 6A (see Order for further details). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 10/25/2021. (nms) |
| Oct 25, 2021 | N/A | Oral Order (0) Docket Text: ORAL ORDER: The Rule 16(b) Conference scheduled for 10/27/2021, is CANCELED. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 10/25/2021. (nms) |
| Oct 25, 2021 | 13 | Proposed Order (11) Docket Text: Proposed Scheduling Order, by Lazer IP LLC. (Pazuniak, George) Modified on 10/25/2021 (nms). |
| Oct 12, 2021 | 12 | Answer to Counterclaim (13) Docket Text: ANSWER to [9] Answer to Complaint, and Counterclaims, by Lazer IP LLC.(Pazuniak, George) Modified on 10/13/2021 (nms). |
| Oct 7, 2021 | 11 | Disclosure Statement (1) Docket Text: Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Microchip Technology Incorporated. (Farnan, Kelly) |
| Sep 23, 2021 | 10 | Order Setting Scheduling Conference (1) Docket Text: Order Setting Rule 16(b) Telephone Conference: A Scheduling Conference is set for 10/27/2021, at 3:00 PM before Judge Richard G. Andrews (see Order for further details). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 9/23/2021. (nms) |
| Sep 20, 2021 | 9 | Answer to Complaint (Exhibit A-B) (30) Docket Text: ANSWER to [1] Complaint, and COUNTERCLAIMS against Lazer IP LLC, by Microchip Technology Incorporated. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibits A-B)(Farnan, Kelly) Modified on 9/21/2021 (nms). |
| Sep 20, 2021 | 9 | Answer to Complaint (Main Document) (30) Docket Text: ANSWER to [1] Complaint, and COUNTERCLAIMS against Lazer IP LLC, by Microchip Technology Incorporated. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibits A-B)(Farnan, Kelly) Modified on 9/21/2021 (nms). |
| Jul 29, 2021 | N/A | Add Attorneys Pro Hac Vice (0) Docket Text: Pro Hac Vice Attorney Brian C. Banner for Microchip Technology Incorporated added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (twk) |
| Jul 29, 2021 | N/A | SO ORDERED (0) Docket Text: SO ORDERED, re [7] STIPULATION to Extend Time (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Microchip Technology Incorporated answer due 9/20/2021). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 7/29/2021. (nms) |
| Jul 28, 2021 | 8 | Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (2) Docket Text: MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Brian C. Banner - filed by Microchip Technology Incorporated. (Farnan, Kelly) |
| Jul 28, 2021 | 7 | Stipulation to EXTEND Time (1) Docket Text: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to move, answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to to September 20, 2021 - filed by Microchip Technology Incorporated. (Farnan, Kelly) |
| Jul 28, 2021 | N/A | SO ORDERED (0) Docket Text: SO ORDERED, re [8] MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Brian C. Banner, filed by Microchip Technology Incorporated. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 7/28/2021. (nms) |
| Jul 21, 2021 | N/A | Case Assigned/Reassigned (0) Docket Text: Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01026-RGA, 1:21-cv-01028-RGA, 1:21-cv-01029-RGA (rjb) |
| Jul 16, 2021 | 6 | Disclosure Statement (1) Docket Text: Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Lazer IP LLC. (Pazuniak, George) |
| Jul 16, 2021 | 5 | Summons Returned Executed (1) Docket Text: SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lazer IP LLC. Microchip Technology Incorporated served on 7/16/2021, answer due 8/6/2021. (Pazuniak, George) |
| Jul 15, 2021 | 4 | Summons Issued - Electronic (2) Docket Text: Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (twk) |
| Jul 15, 2021 | 3 | Patent/Trademark Report to Commissioner (1) Docket Text: Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,701,508. (twk) |
| Jul 15, 2021 | 2 | Magistrate Consent Forms (3) Docket Text: Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (twk) |
| Jul 15, 2021 | 1 | Complaint (Civil Cover Sheet) (1) Docket Text: COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Microchip Technology Incorporated - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3658096.) - filed by Lazer IP LLC. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Civil Cover Sheet)(twk). |
| Jul 15, 2021 | 1 | Complaint (Exhibit B) (30) Docket Text: COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Microchip Technology Incorporated - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3658096.) - filed by Lazer IP LLC. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Civil Cover Sheet)(twk). |
| Jul 15, 2021 | 1 | Complaint (Exhibit A) (18) Docket Text: COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Microchip Technology Incorporated - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3658096.) - filed by Lazer IP LLC. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Civil Cover Sheet)(twk). |
| Jul 15, 2021 | 1 | Complaint (Main Document) (8) Docket Text: COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Microchip Technology Incorporated - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3658096.) - filed by Lazer IP LLC. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Civil Cover Sheet)(twk). |
| Jul 15, 2021 | 1 | Complaint* (1) |
