Microsoft Corporation v. Windy City Innovations, LLC > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2016-01138
Filing Date Jun 3, 2016
Institution Decision Date Nov 29, 2016
Decision Date Nov 29, 2016
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status Terminated-Denied
Administrative JudgesKarl D. Easthom, David C. McKone, J. John Lee
Judge Writing the Final DecisionKarl D. Easthom
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 54, 55, 56, 57, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
5Microsoft Corporation
Attorney Name: Todd M. Siegel
Klarquist Sparkman
Microsoft Corporation
Attorney Name: Joseph A. Micallef
Sidley Austin
Microsoft Corporation
Attorney Name: Todd M. Siegel
Klarquist Sparkman
Attorney Name: John W. McBride
Sidley Austin
Attorney Name: Raquel C. Rodriguez
Sidley Austin
Patent Owner Attorneys
4Windy City Innovations
Attorney Name: Vincent J. Rubino III
Brown Rudnick LLP
Windy City Innovations
Attorney Name: Peter Lambrianakos
Brown Rudnick LLP
Attorney Name: Alfred R. Fabricant
Brown Rudnick LLP
Related Patents
| Doc No | Title | Issue date |
|---|---|---|
| 08473552 | Communications system | Jun 25, 2013 |
