Mobotix Corp. v. E-Watch Corporation > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2013-00499
Filing Date Aug 7, 2013
Institution Decision Date Feb 10, 2014
Decision Date Feb 3, 2015
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status FWD Entered
Administrative JudgesMatthew R. Clements, Jameson Lee, Michael W. Kim
Judge Writing the Final DecisionMatthew R. Clements
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 1, 2, 3, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 36, 37, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76
Claims Instituted: 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 36, 37, 39, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 60, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76
Claims Invalidated: 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 36, 37, 39, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 60, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
2Mobotix
Attorney Name: Adam R. Shartzer
Fish & Richardson
Mobotix
Attorney Name: Wes Musselman
Fish & Richardson
Patent Owner Attorneys
4e-WATCH
Attorney Name: Robert Clinton Curfiss
e-WATCH
Attorney Name: Michael G. Smith
Ramirez & Smith
e-WATCH
Attorney Name: Michael G. Smith
Ramirez & Smith
Attorney Name: Jeffrey Darryl Hunt
MOORE LANDREY LLP
Related Patents
Doc No | Title | Issue date |
---|---|---|
07228429 | Multimedia network appliances for security and surveillance applications | Jun 5, 2007 |