Case number 2:20-cv-03723
NEXT Lighting Corp. v. Prudential Lighting Corporation > Documents
| Date Field | Doc. No. | Description (Pages) |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2020 | 24 | REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: # 1 Dismissal) (iv) (Entered: 08/12/2020) (0) |
| Jul 30, 2020 | 23 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff NEXT Lighting Corp.. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Katz, Robert) (Entered: 07/30/2020) (2) |
| Jul 21, 2020 | 22 | ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO THIRD EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY 14 DAYS 21 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Defendant Prudential Lighting Corporation must file and serve its response to the Complaint on or before August 3, 2020. (iv) (Entered: 07/21/2020) (2) |
| Jul 20, 2020 | 21 | Third STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Prudential Lighting Corporation answer now due 8/3/2020, filed by Defendant Prudential Lighting Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Chang, Cheryl) (Entered: 07/20/2020) (0) |
| Jun 19, 2020 | 20 | ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 19 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Defendant Prudential Lighting Corporation must file and serve their response to the Complaint on or before July 20, 2020. (iv) (Entered: 06/19/2020) (2) |
| Jun 18, 2020 | 19 | Second STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to July 20, 2020 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 filed by Defendant Prudential Lighting Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order granting Stipulation to Second Extension of Time to respond to Complaint)(Chang, Cheryl) (Entered: 06/18/2020) (0) |
| May 21, 2020 | 18 | NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Prudential Lighting Corporation, identifying NEXT Lighting Corp; Prudential Lighting Corporation; Muriel Ellis; Jeffrey Ellis; Elliot Ellis; and Jonathan Ellis. (Chang, Cheryl) (Entered: 05/21/2020) (2) |
| May 13, 2020 | 17 | STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Prudential Lighting Corporation answer now due 6/20/2020, filed by Defendant Prudential Lighting Corporation.(Attorney Cheryl S Chang added to party Prudential Lighting Corporation(pty:dft))(Chang, Cheryl) (Entered: 05/13/2020) (2) |
| May 4, 2020 | 16 | ORDER by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: granting 15 Non-Resident Attorney Robert David Katz APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of NEXT Lighting Corp., designating Ryan E Hatch as local counsel. (lom) (Entered: 05/04/2020) (1) |
| Apr 30, 2020 | 14 | RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Robert D. Katz to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff NEXT Lighting Corp. 12 by Clerk. The document is stricken and counsel is ordered to file an amended or corrected document by May 8, 2020. The proposed Order in word-processing format was not emailed to the chambers email address, mwf_chambers@cacd.uscourts.gov. (lom) (Entered: 04/30/2020) (1) |
| Apr 30, 2020 | 15 | Amended APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Robert D. Katz to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff NEXT Lighting Corp. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Previously Paid on 4/28/2020, Receipt No. 26253314) filed by Plaintiff NEXT Lighting Corp.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Hatch, Ryan) (Entered: 04/30/2020) (0) |
| Apr 29, 2020 | 13 | NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Robert D. Katz to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff NEXT Lighting Corp. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-26253314) 12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(a) Application not complete: state courts to which the applicant has been admitted are not listed. (Thrasher, Lupe) (Entered: 04/29/2020) (1) |
| Apr 28, 2020 | 12 | STRICKEN, see docket entry no. 14 - APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Robert D. Katz to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff NEXT Lighting Corp. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-26253314) filed by Plaintiff NEXT Lighting Corp.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Hatch, Ryan) Modified on 4/30/2020 (lom). (Entered: 04/28/2020) (0) |
| Apr 23, 2020 | 2 | CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff NEXT Lighting Corp.. (Hatch, Ryan) (Entered: 04/23/2020) (3) |
| Apr 23, 2020 | 3 | Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 filed by Plaintiff NEXT Lighting Corp.. (Hatch, Ryan) (Entered: 04/23/2020) (2) |
| Apr 23, 2020 | 4 | REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by NEXT Lighting Corp.. (Hatch, Ryan) (Entered: 04/23/2020) (1) |
| Apr 23, 2020 | 5 | NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff NEXT Lighting Corp., (Hatch, Ryan) (Entered: 04/23/2020) (2) |
| Apr 23, 2020 | 6 | NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (ghap) (Entered: 04/23/2020) (1) |
| Apr 23, 2020 | 7 | NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) (Entered: 04/23/2020) (2) |
| Apr 23, 2020 | 8 | [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED On 4/23/2020, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. 9] 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 as to Defendant Prudential Lighting Corporation. (ghap) Modified on 4/23/2020 (ghap). (Entered: 04/23/2020) (2) |
| Apr 23, 2020 | 9 | NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Summons Issued (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 8 . Document # 8Due to clerical error. The docket clerk attached the 21 Day Summons with wrong header # 3 on summons to the entire image of the new action. (ghap) (Entered: 04/23/2020) (1) |
| Apr 23, 2020 | 10 | 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 as to Defendant Prudential Lighting Corporation. (ghap) (Entered: 04/23/2020) (2) |
| Apr 23, 2020 | 11 | NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Robert Katz. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap) (Entered: 04/23/2020) (1) |
| Apr 23, 2020 | 1 | Complaint* (1) |
