NVIDIA Corporation v. Polaris Innovations Limited > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2017-00381
Filing Date Dec 7, 2016
Institution Decision Date Jun 22, 2017
Decision Date Jun 19, 2018
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status FWD Entered
Administrative JudgesBarbara A. Parvis, Sally C. Medley, William M. Fink
Judge Writing the Final DecisionBarbara A. Parvis
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28
Claims Instituted: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28
Claims Invalidated: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 28
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
7NVidia
Attorney Name: Katherine Kelly Vidal
Fish & Richardson
NVidia
Attorney Name: David M. Hoffman
Fish & Richardson
NVidia
Attorney Name: Jeremy J. Monaldo
Fish & Richardson
NVidia
Attorney Name: Karl Renner
Fish & Richardson
NVidia
Attorney Name: Edward G. Faeth
Fish & Richardson
NVidia
Attorney Name: Andrew M. Goldberg
Fish & Richardson
Attorney Name: Karl Renner
Fish & Richardson
Patent Owner Attorneys
5Polaris Innovations (Quarterhill)
Attorney Name: Bryan Richardson
WiLan Inc
Polaris Innovations (Quarterhill)
Attorney Name: Matthew C. Phillips
Laurence & Phillips IP Law
Polaris Innovations (Quarterhill)
Attorney Name: Derek W. Meeker
Polaris Innovations (Quarterhill)
Attorney Name: Kevin B. Laurence
Renaissance IP Law Group
Polaris Innovations (Quarterhill)
Attorney Name: Matthew C. Phillips
Renaissance IP Law Group
Related Patents
Doc No | Title | Issue date |
---|---|---|
07886122 | Method and circuit for transmitting a memory clock signal | Feb 8, 2011 |