NeoGenomics Laboratories, Inc. v. Natera, Inc. > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2024-00346
Filing Date Dec 19, 2023
Institution Decision Date Jun 21, 2024
Decision Date Jun 21, 2024
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status Institution Denied
Administrative JudgesZhenyu Yang, Deborah Katz, Ryan H. Flax
Judge Writing the Final DecisionZhenyu Yang
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
8NeoGenomics Laboratories, Inc.
Attorney Name: Adrian Clement Percer
Weil, Gotshal & Manges
NeoGenomics Laboratories, Inc.
Attorney Name: Alex S. Yap
Morrison & Foerster
NeoGenomics Laboratories, Inc.
Attorney Name: Mehran Arjomand
Morrison & Foerster
NeoGenomics Laboratories, Inc.
Attorney Name: Forrest M. McClellen
Morrison & Foerster
NeoGenomics Laboratories, Inc.
Attorney Name: Matthew I. Kreeger
Morrison & Foerster
NeoGenomics Laboratories, Inc.
Attorney Name: Briana E. Mittleman
Morrison & Foerster
NeoGenomics Laboratories, Inc.
Attorney Name: Owen G. Hosseinzadeh
Morrison & Foerster
Patent Owner Attorneys
4Natera, Inc.
Attorney Name: Monica M. Arnold
Armond Wilson LLP
Natera, Inc.
Attorney Name: Patrick G. Maloney
Armond Wilson LLP
Natera, Inc.
Attorney Name: Michelle E. Armond
Armond Wilson LLP
Natera, Inc.
Attorney Name: Douglas R. Wilson
Armond Wilson LLP
Related Patents
| Doc No | Title | Issue date |
|---|---|---|
| 11530454 | Detecting mutations and ploidy in chromosomal segments | Dec 20, 2022 |
