Netskope, Inc. v. Fortinet, Inc. > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2022-01587
Filing Date Oct 6, 2022
Institution Decision Date Apr 26, 2023
Decision Date Mar 6, 2024
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status Final Written Decision
Administrative JudgesJames P. Calve, Thomas L. Giannetti, Christopher L. Ogden
Judge Writing the Final DecisionJames P. Calve
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
Claims Instituted: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
Claims Invalidated: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
4Netskope, Inc.
Attorney Name: Babak Tehranchi
Perkins Coie
Netskope, Inc.
Attorney Name: Thomas N. Millikan
Perkins Coie
Netskope, Inc.
Attorney Name: Andrew Nicholas Klein
Perkins Coie
Netskope, Inc.
Attorney Name: Prasant Mohapatra
Perkins Coie
Patent Owner Attorneys
8Fortinet
Attorney Name: James M. Glass
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
Fortinet
Attorney Name: Quincy A. Lu
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
Fortinet
Attorney Name: John T. McKee
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
Fortinet
Attorney Name: Andrew M Holmes
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
Fortinet
Attorney Name: Razmig H. Messerian
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
Attorney Name: Sean T. Gloth II
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
Attorney Name: Ognjen Zivojnovic
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
Related Patents
Doc No | Title | Issue date |
---|---|---|
10237282 | Data leak protection | Mar 19, 2019 |