Netskope, Inc. v. Fortinet, Inc. > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2023-00175
Filing Date Nov 10, 2022
Institution Decision Date May 15, 2023
Decision Date May 15, 2023
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status Institution Denied
Administrative JudgesJames P. Calve, Christopher L. Crumbley, Brian J. McNamara, Sheridan K. Snedden, Carl M. Defranco, Jo-Anne M. Kokoski, Thomas L. Giannetti, Mitchell G. Weatherly, Miriam L. Quinn, Jason M. Repko, Juliet Mitchell Dirba, Stephen E. Belisle, Michael A. Valek
Judge Writing the Final DecisionJames P. Calve
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
3Netskope, Inc.
Attorney Name: Thomas N. Millikan
Perkins Coie
Netskope, Inc.
Attorney Name: Babak Tehranchi
Perkins Coie
Netskope, Inc.
Attorney Name: Andrew Nicholas Klein
Perkins Coie
Patent Owner Attorneys
5PASDAR, BABAK
Attorney Name: James M. Glass
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
PASDAR, BABAK
Attorney Name: Quincy A. Lu
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
PASDAR, BABAK
Attorney Name: John T. McKee
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
PASDAR, BABAK
Attorney Name: Andrew M Holmes
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
PASDAR, BABAK
Attorney Name: John R. Black
University of Colorado
Related Patents
Doc No | Title | Issue date |
---|---|---|
09197601 | System and method for providing a single global borderless virtual perimeter through distributed points of presence | Nov 24, 2015 |