Case number 8:17-cv-00757
Oakley, Inc. v. Coyote Vision USA, Inc. > Documents
| Date Field | Doc. No. | Description (Pages) |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2017 | 20 | REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: # 1 Order) (lwag) (Entered: 07/17/2017) (0) |
| Jul 6, 2017 | 19 | TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - RECEIVED Notice of Receipt of Electronic Case Transfer from U.S. District Court, Western District of New York, 6:17-cv-06433 filed 7/6/2017. (yl) (Entered: 07/06/2017) (0) |
| Jul 5, 2017 | 18 | ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO TRANSFER VENUE TO WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Case was electronically transferred. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (es) (Entered: 07/05/2017) (2) |
| Jun 29, 2017 | 17 | Joint STIPULATION to Transfer Case to United States District Court for the Western District of New York filed by Defendant Coyote Vision USA, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sohi, Jayson) (Entered: 06/29/2017) (0) |
| Jun 26, 2017 | 15 | (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION: On May 30, 2017 and June 20, 2017, the Court issued an Order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution 10 13 . On May 25, 2017 and June 23, 2017, Plaintiff filed respective Stipulations Extending Time to Answer the Complaint 12 14 . In light of this responsive filing, the Court hereby orders the OSCs discharged. **Any further requests for an extension of time are strongly disfavored.** THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 06/26/2017) (0) |
| Jun 23, 2017 | 14 | Second STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 6/30/2017 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 filed by Defendant Coyote Vision USA, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Jayson Singh Sohi added to party Coyote Vision USA, Inc.(pty:dft))(Sohi, Jayson) (Entered: 06/23/2017) (0) |
| Jun 23, 2017 | 16 | ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney, on Second Stipulation for Extension of Time for Coyote Vision USA, Inc. to Respond to Complaint 14 . The Court, after having considered the Parties' stipulation for second extension of time for Defendant, Coyote Vision USA, Inc. to file its Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint of Oakley, Inc. to June 30, 2017, and good cause existing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The deadline for Defendant, Coyote Vision USA, Inc. to file its Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint of Oakley, Inc. is June 30, 2017. (dro) (Entered: 06/26/2017) (2) |
| Jun 20, 2017 | 13 | MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiff's counsel, to show cause in writing no later than June 23, 2017, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff, the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: (see document for details). (dro) (Entered: 06/20/2017) (1) |
| May 26, 2017 | 12 | ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney, Granting Joint Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less), 11 . Defendant Coyote Vision USA, Inc. (Coyote Vision) shall have up to and including June 16, 2017 to file a response to the Complaint. (twdb) (Entered: 05/26/2017) (2) |
| May 25, 2017 | 11 | Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Coyote Vision USA, Inc. answer now due 6/16/2017, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 , Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Order to Show Cause,, 10 filed by Plaintiff Oakley, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Razai, Ali) (Entered: 05/25/2017) (0) |
| May 24, 2017 | 10 | MINUTE IN CHAMBERS by Judge Cormac J. Carney: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiffs counsel, to show cause in writing no later than May 30, 2017, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff, the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: See document for further information. (dv) (Entered: 05/24/2017) (1) |
| May 5, 2017 | 9 | PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Oakley, Inc., upon Defendant Coyote Vision USA, Inc. served on 4/28/2017, answer due 5/19/2017. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Krystal Herschke/Operations Director in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Razai, Ali) (Entered: 05/05/2017) (4) |
| Apr 27, 2017 | 2 | CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Oakley, Inc.. (Razai, Ali) (Entered: 04/27/2017) (3) |
| Apr 27, 2017 | 3 | Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) 2 filed by Plaintiff Oakley, Inc.. (Razai, Ali) (Entered: 04/27/2017) (2) |
| Apr 27, 2017 | 4 | Notice and CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Oakley, Inc., (Razai, Ali) (Entered: 04/27/2017) (1) |
| Apr 27, 2017 | 5 | REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Oakley, Inc.. (Razai, Ali) (Entered: 04/27/2017) (1) |
| Apr 27, 2017 | 6 | NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (esa) (Entered: 04/27/2017) (1) |
| Apr 27, 2017 | 7 | NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) (Entered: 04/27/2017) (2) |
| Apr 27, 2017 | 8 | 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint 1 as to Coyote Vision USA, Inc. (esa) (Entered: 04/27/2017) (2) |
| Apr 27, 2017 | 1 | Complaint* (1) |
